School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
The Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Western Health Partnership, St Albans, 3021, Australia.
Occup Med (Lond). 2022 Apr 19;72(3):215-224. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqac003.
Hospital clinicians report poor psychosocial well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Few studies have reported data at more than one time point.
To compare psychosocial well-being among hospital clinicians at two different time points during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020.
Participants included doctors, nurses, midwives and allied health clinicians at a multi-site, public health service in Melbourne, Australia. Data were collected via two cross-sectional, online surveys: May to June (wave 1; n = 638) and October to December 2020 (wave 2; n = 358). The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) assessed psychological well-being in the past week. Investigator-devised questions assessed COVID-19 concerns and perceived work impacts. General linear models were used to assess impact of wave on psychological distress.
There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. Both positive (e.g. learning experience) and negative (e.g. risk of getting COVID-19) impacts were reported. In both waves, staff were most concerned about health risks to family members. Wave 2 respondents were significantly more likely than wave 1 respondents to indicate concerns about colleagues having COVID-19, increased workloads, leave cancellation and increased conflict at work (all P < 0.001). Adjusting for sex, age, self-rated health and discipline group, depression, anxiety and stress scores were significantly higher for respondents in the second than the first wave (all P < 0.001).
Psychological well-being of hospital clinicians was significantly worse during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic than the first. Sustained occupational and psychosocial support is recommended even when immediate COVID-19 concerns and impacts resolve.
医院临床医生在 COVID-19 大流行期间报告称心理健康状况不佳。很少有研究在多个时间点报告数据。
比较 COVID-19 大流行期间 2020 年两个不同时间点医院临床医生的心理健康状况。
参与者包括澳大利亚墨尔本多地点公共卫生服务的医生、护士、助产士和联合保健临床医生。数据通过两次横断面在线调查收集:2020 年 5 月至 6 月(第 1 波;n = 638)和 10 月至 12 月(第 2 波;n = 358)。抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)评估过去一周的心理健康状况。调查员设计的问题评估 COVID-19 关注和感知工作影响。使用一般线性模型评估波对心理困扰的影响。
两组之间在人口统计学方面没有显著差异。报告了积极的(例如学习经验)和消极的(例如感染 COVID-19 的风险)影响。在两个波中,工作人员最关心的是家庭成员的健康风险。与第 1 波相比,第 2 波的受访者更有可能表示对同事感染 COVID-19、工作量增加、休假取消和工作冲突增加的担忧(均 P < 0.001)。调整性别、年龄、自我评估健康状况和学科组后,第 2 波受访者的抑郁、焦虑和压力评分明显高于第 1 波(均 P < 0.001)。
COVID-19 大流行的第二波期间,医院临床医生的心理健康状况明显恶化。即使当即时 COVID-19 关注和影响得到解决时,也应持续提供职业和社会心理支持。