Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Fahmideh Blvd, Opposite to Lona Park, P.O. Box 6517838736, Hamadan, Iran.
Brucellosis Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2023 Jun;212(3):203-220. doi: 10.1007/s00430-023-00763-y. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
Gaining more appreciation on the protective/damaging aspects of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunity associated with disease severity is of great importance. This study aimed to evaluate the avidity of serum IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) in hospitalized symptomatic COVID-19 patients and asymptomatic RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 carriers as well as to compare antibody avidities with respect to vaccination status, vaccination dose and reinfection status. Serum levels of anti-S and anti-N IgG were determined using specific ELISA kits. Antibody avidity was determined by urea dissociation assay and expressed as avidity index (AI) value. Despite higher IgG levels in the symptomatic group, AI values of both anti-S and anti-N IgG were significantly lower in this group compared to asymptomatic individuals. In both groups, anti-S AI values were elevated in one-dose and two-dose vaccinees versus unvaccinated subjects, although significant differences were only detected in the symptomatic group. However, anti-N avidity showed no significant difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated subgroups. Almost all vaccinated patients of different subgroups (based on vaccine type) had higher anti-S IgG avidity, while the statistical significance was detected only between those receiving Sinopharm compared to the unvaccinated subgroup. Also, statistically significant differences in antibody AIs were only found between primarily infected individuals of the two groups. Our findings indicate a key role for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG avidity in protection from symptomatic COVID-19 and calls for the incorporation of antibody avidity measurement into the current diagnostic tests to predict effective immunity toward SARS-CoV-2 infection or even for prognostic purposes.
深入了解与疾病严重程度相关的抗 SARS-CoV-2 免疫的保护/损伤方面至关重要。本研究旨在评估住院有症状 COVID-19 患者和无症状经 RT-PCR 确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 携带者血清 IgG 抗体对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突(S)和核衣壳(N)的亲和力,并比较抗体亲和力与疫苗接种状态、疫苗接种剂量和再感染状态的关系。使用特异性 ELISA 试剂盒测定血清抗 S 和抗 N IgG 水平。通过尿素解离测定法确定抗体亲和力,并表示为亲和力指数(AI)值。尽管在有症状组中 IgG 水平较高,但与无症状个体相比,该组中抗 S 和抗 N IgG 的 AI 值均显著降低。在两组中,一剂和两剂疫苗接种者的抗 S AI 值均高于未接种疫苗者,尽管在有症状组中仅检测到显著差异。然而,抗 N 亲和力在接种疫苗和未接种疫苗亚组之间没有显著差异。不同亚组(基于疫苗类型)的几乎所有接种疫苗的患者均具有较高的抗 S IgG 亲和力,而仅在接受科兴和国药疫苗的患者与未接种疫苗亚组之间检测到统计学意义。此外,仅在两组中主要感染个体之间发现抗体 AI 存在统计学差异。我们的研究结果表明,抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 亲和力在预防有症状 COVID-19 中起着关键作用,并呼吁将抗体亲和力测量纳入当前的诊断测试中,以预测对 SARS-CoV-2 感染的有效免疫,甚至用于预后目的。