Buonsenso Andrea, Centorbi Marco, Iuliano Enzo, Di Martino Giulia, Della Valle Carlo, Fiorilli Giovanni, Calcagno Giuseppe, di Cagno Alessandra
Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Faculty of Psychology, eCampus University, 22060 Novedrate, Italy.
Sports (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;11(4):76. doi: 10.3390/sports11040076.
The objective of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of flywheel training, which allows for the replication of specific sports movements, overloading both the concentric and eccentric phases. Inclusion criteria were injury prevention outcomes; ability in terms of strength, power, sprinting, jumping and change of direction; competitive athletes; and RCTs. Exclusion criteria were a lack of a control group and lack of baseline and/or follow-up data. The databases used were Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Sage. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the selected RCTs. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence was used. A PICOS (participants, intervention, comparators, study outcomes, and study design) approach was used to evaluate eligibility. A total of 21 RCTs with 8 to 54 participants in each study analyzed flywheel technology and its application in nine sports. The results showed that flywheel training is a good strategy to improve sports performance, providing variation in training methodologies and athletes' adherence. Further studies are needed to define guidelines on training modality, weekly frequency, volume, and inertia load. Only a few studies have applied the flywheel device directly to overload specific multidirectional movements at different joint angles. This method is not exempt from criticalities, such as the cost and the ability to carry out only individual training.
本系统评价的目的是检验飞轮训练的有效性,这种训练能够模拟特定的运动动作,使向心和离心阶段均负荷过载。纳入标准为预防损伤的结果;力量、功率、短跑、跳跃及变向能力;竞技运动员;以及随机对照试验。排除标准为缺乏对照组以及缺乏基线和/或随访数据。所使用的数据库有科学网、Scopus、PubMed、考克兰图书馆和Sage。使用修订后的考克兰偏倚风险工具评估所选随机对照试验的质量。采用牛津循证医学中心2011证据水平。采用PICOS(参与者、干预措施、对照、研究结果和研究设计)方法评估纳入资格。共有21项随机对照试验,每项研究有8至54名参与者,分析了飞轮技术及其在九项运动中的应用。结果表明,飞轮训练是提高运动表现的良好策略,能提供训练方法的多样性并提高运动员的依从性。需要进一步的研究来确定训练方式、每周频率、训练量和惯性负荷的指导原则。只有少数研究将飞轮装置直接应用于在不同关节角度下使特定多方向运动负荷过载。这种方法也并非没有问题,比如成本以及只能进行个体训练的局限性。