Suppr超能文献

惯性飞轮训练与强化离心负荷训练对训练有素的男性大学短跑运动员力量、功率和速度的影响

Effects of Inertial Flywheel Training vs. Accentuated Eccentric Loading Training on Strength, Power, and Speed in Well-Trained Male College Sprinters.

作者信息

Hu Zhongzhong, Liu Yuhang, Huang Keke, Huang Hao, Zhang Yu, Yuan Xiaoyi

机构信息

School of Sports Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China.

China Athletics College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(9):1081. doi: 10.3390/life14091081.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of inertial flywheel training and accentuated eccentric loading training on the neuromuscular performance of well-trained male college sprinters. Fourteen sprinters were recruited and randomly assigned to either the flywheel training (FWT, = 7) group or the accentuated eccentric loading training (AELT, = 7) group. The FWT group completed four sets of 2 + 7 repetitions of flywheel squats, whereas the AELT group performed four sets of seven repetitions of barbell squats (concentric/eccentric: 80%/120% 1RM). Both groups underwent an eight-week squat training program, with two sessions per week. A two-way repeated ANOVA analysis was used to find differences between the two groups and between the two testing times (pre-test vs. post-test). The results indicated significant improvements in all measured variables for the FWT group: 1RM (5.0%, ES = 1.28), CMJ (13.3%, ES = 5.42), SJ (6.0%, ES = 2.94), EUR (6.5%, ES = 4.42), SLJ (2.9%, ES = 1.77), and 30 m sprint (-3.4%, ES = -2.80); and for the AELT group: 1RM (6.3%, ES = 2.53), CMJ (7.4%, ES = 3.44), SJ (6.4%, ES = 2.21), SLJ (2.2%, ES = 1.20), and 30 m sprint (-3.0%, ES = -1.84), with the exception of EUR (0.9%, ES = 0.63, = 0.134), showing no significant difference. In addition, no significant interaction effects between group and time were observed for 1RM back squat, SJ, SLJ, and 30 m sprint ( > 0.05). Conversely, a significant interaction effect between group and time was observed for both CMJ and EUR ( < 0.001); post hoc analysis revealed that the improvements in CMJ and EUR were significantly greater in the FWT group compared to the AELT group ( < 0.001). These findings indicate that both FWT and AELT are effective at enhancing lower-body strength, power, and speed in well-trained male college sprinters, with FWT being particularly more effective in promoting elastic energy storage and the full utilization of the stretch-shortening cycle.

摘要

本研究旨在评估和比较惯性飞轮训练与强化离心负荷训练对训练有素的男性大学生短跑运动员神经肌肉性能的影响。招募了14名短跑运动员,并将他们随机分为飞轮训练组(FWT,n = 7)或强化离心负荷训练组(AELT,n = 7)。FWT组完成了四组,每组2 + 7次的飞轮深蹲,而AELT组进行了四组,每组七次的杠铃深蹲(向心/离心:80%/120% 1RM)。两组都进行了为期八周的深蹲训练计划,每周训练两次。采用双向重复方差分析来找出两组之间以及两个测试时间(预测试与后测试)之间的差异。结果表明,FWT组所有测量变量均有显著改善:1RM(5.0%,ES = 1.28)、CMJ(13.3%,ES = 5.42)、SJ(6.0%,ES = 2.94)、EUR(6.5%,ES = 4.42)、SLJ(2.9%,ES = 1.77)和30米短跑成绩(-3.4%,ES = -2.80);AELT组:1RM(6.3%,ES = 2.53)、CMJ(7.4%,ES = 3.44)、SJ(6.4%,ES = 2.21)、SLJ(2.2%,ES = 1.20)和30米短跑成绩(-3.0%,ES = -1.84),除EUR外(0.9%,ES = 0.63,p = 0.134),无显著差异。此外,对于1RM后深蹲、SJ、SLJ和30米短跑,未观察到组间和时间之间的显著交互作用(p > 0.05)。相反,对于CMJ和EUR,观察到组间和时间之间存在显著的交互作用(p < 0.001);事后分析显示,与AELT组相比,FWT组在CMJ和EUR方面的改善显著更大(p < 0.001)。这些发现表明,FWT和AELT都能有效提高训练有素的男性大学生短跑运动员的下肢力量、功率和速度,其中FWT在促进弹性能量储存和充分利用拉长-缩短周期方面特别有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3140/11433371/1ef104c10953/life-14-01081-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验