Human-Centred Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia.
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;23(8):3980. doi: 10.3390/s23083980.
Critically ill patients often lack cognitive or communicative functions, making it challenging to assess their pain levels using self-reporting mechanisms. There is an urgent need for an accurate system that can assess pain levels without relying on patient-reported information. Blood volume pulse (BVP) is a relatively unexplored physiological measure with the potential to assess pain levels. This study aims to develop an accurate pain intensity classification system based on BVP signals through comprehensive experimental analysis. Twenty-two healthy subjects participated in the study, in which we analyzed the classification performance of BVP signals for various pain intensities using time, frequency, and morphological features through fourteen different machine learning classifiers. Three experiments were conducted using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation to better examine the hidden signatures of BVP signals for pain level classification. The results of the experiments showed that BVP signals combined with machine learning can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain levels in clinical settings. Specifically, no pain and high pain BVP signals were classified with 96.6% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 91.6% specificity using a combination of time, frequency, and morphological features with artificial neural networks (ANNs). The classification of no pain and low pain BVP signals yielded 83.3% accuracy using a combination of time and morphological features with the AdaBoost classifier. Finally, the multi-class experiment, which classified no pain, low pain, and high pain, achieved 69% overall accuracy using a combination of time and morphological features with ANN. In conclusion, the experimental results suggest that BVP signals combined with machine learning can offer an objective and reliable assessment of pain levels in clinical settings.
危重症患者常缺乏认知或交流功能,使用自我报告机制评估其疼痛程度具有挑战性。因此,我们迫切需要一种能够在不依赖患者报告信息的情况下评估疼痛程度的准确系统。脉容积脉搏 (BVP) 是一种尚未充分探索的生理测量方法,具有评估疼痛程度的潜力。本研究旨在通过全面的实验分析,基于 BVP 信号开发一种准确的疼痛强度分类系统。
本研究共纳入 22 名健康受试者,我们分析了通过 14 种不同机器学习分类器使用时间、频率和形态特征对各种疼痛强度的 BVP 信号的分类性能。通过留一受试者交叉验证进行了三项实验,以更好地检查 BVP 信号用于疼痛水平分类的隐藏特征。
实验结果表明,BVP 信号结合机器学习可以为临床环境中的疼痛水平提供客观和定量的评估。具体而言,使用时间、频率和形态特征与人工神经网络 (ANN) 相结合,无疼痛和高疼痛 BVP 信号的分类准确率为 96.6%、灵敏度为 100%、特异性为 91.6%。使用时间和形态特征与 AdaBoost 分类器相结合,无疼痛和低疼痛 BVP 信号的分类准确率为 83.3%。最后,使用时间和形态特征与 ANN 相结合的多类实验,对无疼痛、低疼痛和高疼痛的分类总准确率为 69%。
总之,实验结果表明,BVP 信号结合机器学习可以为临床环境中的疼痛水平提供客观可靠的评估。