Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Eur J Pain. 2021 Jul;25(6):1209-1226. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1746. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
Pain influences motor control. Previous reviews observed that pain reduces the excitability of corticospinal projections to muscles tested with transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, the independent effect of the type of pain models (tonic, phasic), pain location and tissues targeted (e.g. muscle, skin) remains unexplored. The objective of this review was to determine the influence of experimental pain and of different methodological factors on the corticospinal excitability.
Three electronic databases were searched: Embase, Pubmed and Web of Science. Meta-analyses were conducted in three consecutive steps to reduce methodological variability: (a) all studies; (b) same pain location; (c) same tissues, pain location and muscle state. Strength of evidence was assessed for each analysis performed.
Forty studies were included in the review and 26 in the meta-analysis as it focused only on studies using tonic pain. Overall, there was conflicting/moderate evidence of a diminution of corticospinal excitability during and after tonic pain. When considering only pain location, tonic hand and face pain induced a reduction in corticospinal excitability (limited evidence). Both muscle and cutaneous hand pain reduced corticospinal excitability (limited/conflicting evidence). Similar results were observed for phasic pain (limited evidence).
Our results confirm the inhibitory effect of pain on corticospinal excitability for both tonic and phasic pain. This reduction was specific to hand and face pain. Also, both cutaneous and muscle hand pain reduced excitability. The strength of evidence remains limited/conflicting. More high-quality studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.
This study adds evidence on the effect of specific factors on the modulation of corticospinal excitability during/after experimental pain. The reduction in corticospinal excitability was driven by hand and face pain. We confirmed previous results that muscle pain reduces corticospinal excitability and provided evidence of a similar effect for cutaneous pain. Both models may inform on the influence of different types of pain on motor control. Future studies are needed to determine the origin of the effect of pain.
疼痛会影响运动控制。先前的综述观察到,疼痛会降低经颅磁刺激测试肌肉的皮质脊髓投射兴奋性。然而,疼痛模型(持续性、阵发性)的类型、疼痛位置和靶向组织(例如肌肉、皮肤)的独立影响仍未得到探索。本综述的目的是确定实验性疼痛和不同方法学因素对皮质脊髓兴奋性的影响。
三个电子数据库(Embase、Pubmed 和 Web of Science)进行了搜索。在三个连续步骤中进行了荟萃分析,以减少方法学变异性:(a)所有研究;(b)相同的疼痛位置;(c)相同的组织、疼痛位置和肌肉状态。对每个分析进行了证据强度评估。
综述共纳入 40 项研究,荟萃分析仅纳入了 26 项研究,因为它们仅关注使用持续性疼痛的研究。总体而言,持续性疼痛期间和之后皮质脊髓兴奋性降低的证据存在矛盾/中度。当仅考虑疼痛位置时,手部和面部持续性疼痛会降低皮质脊髓兴奋性(有限证据)。手部肌肉和皮肤疼痛都会降低皮质脊髓兴奋性(有限/矛盾证据)。阵发性疼痛也观察到类似的结果(有限证据)。
我们的结果证实了疼痛对皮质脊髓兴奋性的抑制作用,无论是持续性还是阵发性疼痛。这种降低是手部和面部疼痛所特有的。此外,手部皮肤和肌肉疼痛都会降低兴奋性。证据的强度仍然是有限/矛盾的。需要更多高质量的研究来证实我们的结论。
本研究增加了关于特定因素对实验性疼痛期间/之后皮质脊髓兴奋性调节影响的证据。皮质脊髓兴奋性的降低是由手部和面部疼痛驱动的。我们证实了先前的结果,即肌肉疼痛会降低皮质脊髓兴奋性,并提供了类似皮肤疼痛也会产生这种影响的证据。这两种模型都可以说明不同类型的疼痛对运动控制的影响。需要进一步的研究来确定疼痛效应的起源。