Cheenakula Dheeraja, Griebel Kai, Montag David, Grömping Markus
Institute NOWUM-Energy, FH Aachen, University of Applied Sciences, Jülich, Germany.
Institute of Environmental Engineering, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Apr 11;14:1155235. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1155235. eCollection 2023.
Deammonification for nitrogen removal in municipal wastewater in temperate and cold climate zones is currently limited to the side stream of municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTP). This study developed a conceptual model of a mainstream deammonification plant, designed for 30,000 P.E., considering possible solutions corresponding to the challenging mainstream conditions in Germany. In addition, the energy-saving potential, nitrogen elimination performance and construction-related costs of mainstream deammonification were compared to a conventional plant model, having a single-stage activated sludge process with upstream denitrification. The results revealed that an additional treatment step by combining chemical precipitation and ultra-fine screening is advantageous prior the mainstream deammonification. Hereby chemical oxygen demand (COD) can be reduced by 80% so that the COD:N ratio can be reduced from 12 to 2.5. Laboratory experiments testing mainstream conditions of temperature (8-20°C), pH (6-9) and COD:N ratio (1-6) showed an achievable volumetric nitrogen removal rate (VNRR) of at least 50 gN/(m∙d) for various deammonifying sludges from side stream deammonification systems in the state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, where m denotes reactor volume. Assuming a retained N content of 0.0035 kgN/(P.E.∙d) from the daily loads of N at carbon removal stage and a VNRR of 50 gN/(m∙d) under mainstream conditions, a resident-specific reactor volume of 0.115 m/(P.E.) is required for mainstream deammonification. This is in the same order of magnitude as the conventional activated sludge process, i.e., 0.173 m/(P.E.) for an MWWTP of size class of 4. The conventional plant model yielded a total specific electricity demand of 35 kWh/(P.E.∙a) for the operation of the whole MWWTP and an energy recovery potential of 15.8 kWh/(P.E.∙a) through anaerobic digestion. In contrast, the developed mainstream deammonification model plant would require only a 21.5 kWh/(P.E.∙a) energy demand and result in 24 kWh/(P.E.∙a) energy recovery potential, enabling the mainstream deammonification model plant to be self-sufficient. The retrofitting costs for the implementation of mainstream deammonification in existing conventional MWWTPs are nearly negligible as the existing units like activated sludge reactors, aerators and monitoring technology are reusable. However, the mainstream deammonification must meet the performance requirement of VNRR of about 50 gN/(m∙d) in this case.
在温带和寒带气候区的城市污水脱氮中,目前亚硝化反硝化作用仅限于城市污水处理厂(MWWTP)的侧流。本研究针对德国具有挑战性的主流条件,开发了一个设计规模为30000人口当量(P.E.)的主流亚硝化反硝化处理厂概念模型。此外,还将主流亚硝化反硝化的节能潜力、脱氮性能和建设相关成本与传统处理厂模型进行了比较,传统处理厂模型采用带有前置反硝化的单级活性污泥工艺。结果表明,在主流亚硝化反硝化之前,结合化学沉淀和超细筛分进行额外的处理步骤是有利的。由此化学需氧量(COD)可降低80%,使COD:N比从12降至2.5。在温度(8 - 20°C)、pH值(6 - 9)和COD:N比(1 - 6)的主流条件下进行的实验室实验表明,对于德国北莱茵 - 威斯特法伦州侧流亚硝化反硝化系统的各种亚硝化反硝化污泥,可实现的容积氮去除率(VNRR)至少为50 gN/(m³∙d),其中m表示反应器体积。假设在碳去除阶段每日氮负荷中保留的氮含量为0.0035 kgN/(P.E.∙d),且主流条件下的VNRR为50 gN/(m³∙d),则主流亚硝化反硝化所需的人均反应器体积为0.115 m³/(P.E.)。这与传统活性污泥工艺处于同一数量级,即对于规模等级为4的MWWTP,人均反应器体积为0.173 m³/(P.E.)。传统处理厂模型在整个MWWTP运行时的总单位电耗为35 kWh/(P.E.∙a),通过厌氧消化的能量回收潜力为15.8 kWh/(P.E.∙a)。相比之下,所开发的主流亚硝化反硝化模型厂仅需21.5 kWh/(P.E.∙a)的能量需求,并产生24 kWh/(P.E.∙a)的能量回收潜力,使主流亚硝化反硝化模型厂能够实现自给自足。在现有传统MWWTP中实施主流亚硝化反硝化的改造成本几乎可以忽略不计,因为现有的单元如活性污泥反应器、曝气器和监测技术均可重复使用。然而,在这种情况下,主流亚硝化反硝化必须满足约50 gN/(m³∙d)的VNRR性能要求。