• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拉姆达-缪-西格玛方法的国际和国家胎儿生长图表在检测小于胎龄儿方面的准确性。

The accuracy of international and national fetal growth charts in detecting small-for-gestational-age infants using the Lambda-Mu-Sigma method.

作者信息

Saw Shier Nee, Lim Mei Cee, Liew Chuan Nyen, Ahmad Kamar Azanna, Sulaiman Sofiah, Saaid Rahmah, Loo Chu Kiong

机构信息

Department of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Apr 11;10:1123948. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123948. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123948
PMID:37114151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126230/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To construct a national fetal growth chart using retrospective data and compared its diagnostic accuracy in predicting SGA at birth with existing international growth charts.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study where datasets from May 2011 to Apr 2020 were extracted to construct the fetal growth chart using the Lambda-Mu-Sigma method. SGA is defined as birth weight <10th centile. The local growth chart's diagnostic accuracy in detecting SGA at birth was evaluated using datasets from May 2020 to Apr 2021 and was compared with the WHO, Hadlock, and INTERGROWTH-21st charts. Balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 68,897 scans were collected and five biometric growth charts were constructed. Our national growth chart achieved an accuracy of 69% and a sensitivity of 42% in identifying SGA at birth. The WHO chart showed similar diagnostic performance as our national growth chart, followed by the Hadlock (67% accuracy and 38% sensitivity) and INTERGROWTH-21st (57% accuracy and 19% sensitivity). The specificities for all charts were 95-96%. All growth charts showed higher accuracy in the third trimester, with an improvement of 8-16%, as compared to that in the second trimester.

CONCLUSION

Using the Hadlock and INTERGROWTH-21st chart in the Malaysian population may results in misdiagnose of SGA. Our population local chart has slightly higher accuracy in predicting preterm SGA in the second trimester which can enable earlier intervention for babies who are detected as SGA. All growth charts' diagnostic accuracies were poor in the second trimester, suggesting the need of improvising alternative techniques for early detection of SGA to improve fetus outcomes.

摘要

目的

利用回顾性数据构建全国胎儿生长曲线,并将其预测出生时小于胎龄儿(SGA)的诊断准确性与现有的国际生长曲线进行比较。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,提取2011年5月至2020年4月的数据集,采用Lambda-Mu-Sigma方法构建胎儿生长曲线。SGA定义为出生体重低于第10百分位数。利用2020年5月至2021年4月的数据集评估本地生长曲线在检测出生时SGA的诊断准确性,并与世界卫生组织(WHO)、哈德洛克(Hadlock)和INTERGROWTH-21st生长曲线进行比较。报告了平衡准确性、敏感性和特异性。

结果

共收集了68897次扫描,并构建了五条生物测量生长曲线。我们的全国生长曲线在识别出生时的SGA方面,准确率达到69%,敏感性为42%。WHO生长曲线显示出与我们的全国生长曲线相似的诊断性能,其次是哈德洛克生长曲线(准确率67%,敏感性38%)和INTERGROWTH-21st生长曲线(准确率57%,敏感性19%)。所有生长曲线的特异性均为95%-96%。与孕中期相比,所有生长曲线在孕晚期的准确性更高,提高了8%-16%。

结论

在马来西亚人群中使用哈德洛克和INTERGROWTH-21st生长曲线可能会导致SGA的误诊。我们的人群本地生长曲线在孕中期预测早产SGA方面的准确性略高,这可以使被检测为SGA的婴儿得到更早的干预。所有生长曲线在孕中期的诊断准确性都很差,这表明需要改进替代技术以早期检测SGA,从而改善胎儿结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/e4ceede2d691/fsurg-10-1123948-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/b32f1f631832/fsurg-10-1123948-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/0cdb95435bcc/fsurg-10-1123948-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/ef745816719f/fsurg-10-1123948-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/e4ceede2d691/fsurg-10-1123948-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/b32f1f631832/fsurg-10-1123948-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/0cdb95435bcc/fsurg-10-1123948-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/ef745816719f/fsurg-10-1123948-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc1/10126230/e4ceede2d691/fsurg-10-1123948-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The accuracy of international and national fetal growth charts in detecting small-for-gestational-age infants using the Lambda-Mu-Sigma method.使用拉姆达-缪-西格玛方法的国际和国家胎儿生长图表在检测小于胎龄儿方面的准确性。
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 11;10:1123948. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123948. eCollection 2023.
2
Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.识别适用于早产儿人群的最佳生长图表:一项澳大利亚全州回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Oct 4;16(10):e1002923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002923. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.比较 INTERGROWTH-21 世纪和 Hadlock 生长标准预测小于胎龄儿和短期新生儿结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;33(11):1906-1912. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1533945. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.用于预测出生时小于胎龄儿的个体产前工具的诊断准确性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):493-499. doi: 10.1002/uog.17211.
5
Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.六种出生体重和估计胎儿体重标准预测不良围产结局的性能:一项全国性的 10 年基于人群的研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):264-277. doi: 10.1002/uog.22151.
6
Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.评估用于检测小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿不良结局的估计胎儿体重图表性能的比较:一项基于法国人群的研究。
BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):938-948. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17021. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
7
Differences When Classifying Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants According to the Growth Chart Applied.根据所应用的生长图表对小于胎龄早产儿进行分类时的差异。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1212-e1219. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761297. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
8
Assessing the role of maternal race on the prediction of NICU admission by three growth charts: a cross-sectional study.评估三种生长图表在预测新生儿重症监护病房入院方面的作用:一项横断面研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;34(8):1233-1240. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1631791. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
9
Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.使用人群、定制和生长图表确定与不良围产结局相关的出生体重百分位数阈值:一项基于人群的瑞典队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Sep 20;16(9):e1002902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002902. eCollection 2019 Sep.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of fetal growth charts for placenta-related fetal growth restriction.胎儿生长图表在胎盘相关胎儿生长受限中的诊断准确性。
Placenta. 2021 Feb;105:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.01.022. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of late-onset fetal growth restriction using a combined first- and second-trimester screening model.使用联合早、中期筛查模型预测晚期胎儿生长受限。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022 Feb;51(2):102273. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102273. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
2
International versus national growth charts for identifying small and large-for-gestational age newborns: A population-based study in 15 European countries.用于识别小于胎龄儿和大于胎龄儿的国际与国家生长曲线图表:一项基于15个欧洲国家人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Jul 15;8:100167. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100167. eCollection 2021 Sep.
3
Machine learning improves early prediction of small-for-gestational-age births and reveals nuchal fold thickness as unexpected predictor.
机器学习提高了对小于胎龄儿出生的早期预测,并揭示了颈项皱褶厚度作为意外预测指标。
Prenat Diagn. 2021 Mar;41(4):505-516. doi: 10.1002/pd.5903. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
4
Current use and performance of the different fetal growth charts in the Italian population.意大利人群中不同胎儿生长发育曲线的当前应用情况及表现
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
5
Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses.比较小胎龄儿队列中超声估计胎儿体重与出生体重的关系。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Nov;98(11):1435-1441. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13645. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
6
Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.比较 INTERGROWTH-21 世纪和 Hadlock 生长标准预测小于胎龄儿和短期新生儿结局。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jun;33(11):1906-1912. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1533945. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
7
Strategies for optimizing maternal nutrition to promote infant development.优化母婴营养策略以促进婴儿发育。
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 22;15(Suppl 1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0534-3.
8
The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.世界卫生组织胎儿生长图表:概念、发现、解读和应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S619-S629. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010.
9
Slow fetal growth between first and early second trimester ultrasound scans and risk of small for gestational age (SGA) birth.孕早期首次超声检查至孕中期早期超声检查期间胎儿生长缓慢与小于胎龄儿(SGA)出生风险
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184853. eCollection 2017.
10
New body composition reference charts for preterm infants.早产儿新的身体成分参考图表。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jan;105(1):70-77. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.138248. Epub 2016 Nov 2.