Mozaffarian Dariush, El-Abbadi Naglaa H, O'Hearn Meghan, Erndt-Marino Josh, Masters William A, Jacques Paul, Shi Peilin, Blumberg Jeffrey B, Micha Renata
Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Nat Food. 2021 Oct;2(10):809-818. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00381-y. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
Nutrient profiling systems (NPS) aim to discriminate the healthfulness of foods for front-of-package labelling, warning labels, taxation, company ratings and more. Existing NPS often assess relatively few nutrients and ingredients, use inconsistent criteria across food categories and have not incorporated the newest science. Here, we developed and validated an NPS, the Food Compass, to incorporate a broader range of food characteristics, attributes and uniform scoring principles. We scored 54 attributes across 9 health-relevant domains: nutrient ratios, vitamins, minerals, food ingredients, additives, processing, specific lipids, fibre and protein, and phytochemicals. The domain scores were summed into a final Food Compass Score (FCS) ranging from 1 (least healthy) to 100 (most healthy) for all foods and beverages. Content validity was confirmed by assessing nutrients, food ingredients and other characteristics of public health concern; face validity was confirmed by assessing the FCS for 8,032 foods and beverages reported in NHANES/FNDDS 2015-16; and convergent and discriminant validity was confirmed from comparisons with the NOVA food processing classification, the Health Star Rating and the Nutri-Score. The FCS differentiated food categories and food items well, with mean ± s.d. ranging from 17.1 ± 17.2 for savoury snacks and sweet desserts to 81.6 ± 16.0 for legumes, nuts and seeds. In many food categories, the FCS provided important discrimination of specific foods and beverages as compared with NOVA, the Health Star Rating or the Nutri-Score. On the basis of demonstrated content, convergent and discriminant validity, the Food Compass provides an NPS scoring a broader range of attributes and domains than previous systems with uniform and transparent principles. This publicly available tool will help guide consumer choice, research, food policy, industry reformulations and mission-focused investment decisions.
营养成分剖析系统(NPS)旨在区分食品的健康程度,以用于包装正面标签、警示标签、税收、企业评级等诸多方面。现有的NPS通常只评估相对较少的营养素和成分,在不同食品类别中使用不一致的标准,且未纳入最新科学成果。在此,我们开发并验证了一种NPS——食品罗盘(Food Compass),以纳入更广泛的食品特征、属性和统一的评分原则。我们对9个与健康相关领域的54个属性进行了评分:营养比例、维生素、矿物质、食品成分、添加剂、加工方式、特定脂质、纤维和蛋白质以及植物化学物质。所有食品和饮料的领域得分汇总为最终的食品罗盘分数(FCS),范围从1(最不健康)到100(最健康)。通过评估营养素、食品成分和其他公共卫生关注的特征来确认内容效度;通过评估2015 - 16年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)/食品和营养数据库(FNDDS)中报告的8032种食品和饮料的FCS来确认表面效度;通过与NOVA食品加工分类、健康星级评级和营养评分进行比较来确认收敛效度和区分效度。FCS能够很好地区分食品类别和食品项目,咸味小吃和甜品的平均±标准差为17.1±17.2,而豆类、坚果和种子的平均±标准差为81.6±16.0。与NOVA、健康星级评级或营养评分相比,在许多食品类别中,FCS对特定食品和饮料提供了重要的区分。基于已证明的内容效度、收敛效度和区分效度,食品罗盘提供了一种比以往系统更广泛地对属性和领域进行评分的NPS,且具有统一和透明的原则。这个公开可用的工具将有助于指导消费者选择、研究、食品政策、行业配方调整以及以使命为导向的投资决策。