Suppr超能文献

物理疗法评估和治疗胫骨外固定器患者:系统范围综述。

Physiotherapy assessment and treatment of patients with tibial external fixator: a systematic scoping review.

机构信息

Physiotherapy Department, Post Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Physiotherapy Department, Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPel), Pelotas, Brazil.

出版信息

Disabil Rehabil. 2024 May;46(9):1673-1684. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2202419. Epub 2023 Apr 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To map evidence regarding physiotherapy assessment and treatment of patients with tibial external fixator (EF), and to point out literature gaps for further research.

METHODS

Systematic scoping review conducted in four databases. We included both experimental and non-experimental studies involving patients with tibial EF and outcomes of interest. We recorded study design, population, sample size, sample age, reason for EF use, type of surgery, type of EF used, instruments used for assessing function, pain, quality of life, satisfaction, psychosocial aspects, and physiotherapy treatment descriptions from included studies. We categorised data accordingly to outcomes assessed and physiotherapy treatments description.

RESULTS

Eighty-six studies were included involving 3070 patients. Causes of fixator use were traumatic conditions, acquired and congenital deformities, and non-traumatic conditions, like compartmental osteoarthritis. Function was assessed in about three-quarters of included studies, though other outcomes were not presented in most studies. Only one study described satisfactorily the physiotherapy treatment. Almost half of the studies did not provide any description of the rehabilitation process.

CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence about the assessment of function, pain, quality of life, satisfaction, psychosocial aspects, and other outcomes in tibial EF patients. Physiotherapy treatment in these patients is poorly reported. Open Science Framework: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/UT2DA.

摘要

目的

绘制有关使用胫骨外固定器(EF)的患者的物理治疗评估和治疗的证据,并指出进一步研究的文献空白。

方法

在四个数据库中进行系统的范围综述。我们纳入了涉及胫骨 EF 和感兴趣结果的患者的实验和非实验研究。我们记录了研究设计、人群、样本量、样本年龄、EF 使用原因、手术类型、使用的 EF 类型、用于评估功能、疼痛、生活质量、满意度、心理社会方面和物理治疗描述的仪器。我们根据评估的结果和物理治疗描述对数据进行分类。

结果

纳入了 86 项研究,涉及 3070 名患者。固定器使用的原因是创伤性疾病、获得性和先天性畸形以及非创伤性疾病,如间隔性骨关节炎。大约四分之三的纳入研究评估了功能,但大多数研究没有报告其他结果。只有一项研究对物理治疗治疗进行了详细描述。几乎一半的研究没有描述康复过程。

结论

关于胫骨 EF 患者的功能、疼痛、生活质量、满意度、心理社会方面和其他结果的评估证据很少。这些患者的物理治疗治疗报告不佳。开放科学框架:doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/UT2DA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验