Pawson Jessica R, Church Daniel, Fletcher Joanna, Wood Rebecca Al, Hilton Catherine, Lloyd James, Brien Jade, Collins Kathryn C
Department of Orthopaedics, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, England, United Kingdom.
Department of Limb Reconstruction - Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom.
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2024 Jan-Apr;19(1):45-55. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1609.
External fixation devices are commonly used in orthopaedic surgery to manage a range of pathologies. In this patient population, there is currently no consensus on optimal rehabilitation techniques. There exists a large variation in practice, with a limited understanding of how these affect treatment outcomes.
Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted of Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, PEDro, and COCHRANE databases, grey literature sources and forward and backward searching of included articles. Studies were selected following rigorous screening with predefined inclusion criteria. Data quality was assessed using validated appraisal tools. Articles were synthesised by rehabilitation type and descriptive analysis was subsequently performed.
From 1,156 articles identified, 18 were eligible for inclusion. The overall quality was low, with clinical commentaries and case studies being the most common study type. Studies were synthesised by rehabilitation type, the most common themes being gait re-education, strengthening, therapy-assisted, active exercises and weight-bearing exercises.
There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support meaningful recommendations and guide rehabilitation practices for this patient cohort. Further research for patients being treated in external fixation, especially related to the potential effects of physical rehabilitation on bone healing, return of strength, mobility and independent function is likely to have transferability within wider orthopaedic populations.
This systematic review is unable to provide clinical recommendations due to the poor quality of the available literature. However, it is hoped this paper will provide a foundation for further research to improve rehabilitation for patients being treated with external fixation.
Pawson JR, Church D, Fletcher J, . Rehabilitation Techniques for Adults Undergoing External Fixation Treatment for Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):45-55.
外固定装置在骨科手术中常用于处理一系列病症。在这类患者群体中,目前对于最佳康复技术尚无共识。实际操作存在很大差异,人们对这些差异如何影响治疗效果的了解有限。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,对联合与补充医学数据库(AMED)、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引(CINAHL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、循证医学数据库(PEDro)和考克兰数据库进行了系统评价,还检索了灰色文献来源,并对纳入文章进行了前后向检索。根据预先定义的纳入标准进行严格筛选后选择研究。使用经过验证的评估工具评估数据质量。按康复类型对文章进行综合分析,随后进行描述性分析。
在识别出的1156篇文章中,18篇符合纳入标准。总体质量较低,临床评论和病例研究是最常见的研究类型。按康复类型对研究进行综合分析,最常见的主题是步态再训练、强化训练、治疗辅助、主动运动和负重运动。
缺乏高质量证据来支持有意义的建议并指导该患者群体的康复实践。对外固定治疗患者的进一步研究,特别是与物理康复对骨愈合、力量恢复、活动能力和独立功能的潜在影响相关的研究,可能在更广泛的骨科人群中具有可转移性。
由于现有文献质量较差,本系统评价无法提供临床建议。然而,希望本文能为进一步研究提供基础,以改善外固定治疗患者的康复情况。
Pawson JR, Church D, Fletcher J, . 下肢重建外固定治疗成人的康复技术:一项系统评价。创伤肢体重建策略2024;19(1):45 - 55。