Characterizing digital access in pediatric urology.

BACKGROUND

Virtual medicine has the potential to improve access for underserved populations by facilitating timely remote evaluation. However, challenges in the real-world implementation of this technology may paradoxically exacerbate health disparities. We sought to characterize families' digital access and how social determinants of health may impact virtual medicine access within pediatric urology. We hypothesized that disadvantaged socioeconomic status would be a barrier to virtual medicine access.

STUDY DESIGN

A digital access screening tool was prospectively developed and launched in July 2021. Schedulers are prompted to complete this optional screening questionnaire at the time of patient intake, for video or in-person encounters. The parent is screened for access to a device and reliable internet or cellular data that could be used to participate in a video visit. These represented the primary study outcomes. A modality preference for an in-person visit, video visit, or no preference was also recorded. Patient demographics were retrospectively evaluated, and socioeconomic status was estimated using the Distressed Communities Index generated for each patient's zip code. For each zip code, the Distressed Communities Index produces a normalized, comparative distress score ranging from 0 ("prosperous") to 100 ("distressed").

RESULTS

3885 patients were included, with median age of 5 years (IQR 1-11). Almost 74% were male, 71.3% were White, 20.9% had public insurance, and 2.9% required an interpreter. The median distress score was 14.2 (IQR 7.2-27.5). Screening revealed that 136 families (3.5%) lacked digital access. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, insurance type (p = 0.0020) and distress score (p = 0.0125) were significant predictors of digital access (Summary Table). Those patients who lacked access to a device (p < 0.0001) or reliable internet/cellular data (p < 0.0001) were more likely to prefer an in-person visit.

DISCUSSION

Family screening revealed that there is a small but significant proportion of families who lack digital access, and this cohort disproportionately represents underserved communities with higher distress scores, likely reflecting lower socioeconomic status. Those families without digital access were more likely to prefer an in-person visit. Improved identification of these socially complex "at-risk" patients can assist in the development of more inclusive health care strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the chance for virtual medicine to expand access for underserved populations, lack of digital tools may hinder its potential impact on health disparities in pediatric urology. Ongoing digital access screening and further studies are needed to design interventions tailored to the specific needs of our patients, allowing for more equitable pediatric urological care.