Geracitano John, Barron Luke, McSwain David, Khairat Saif
Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 3;10:20552076241288316. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288316. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Digital health services continue growing in usage and popularity, with patients and healthcare organizations benefiting from their use. Despite this, no mechanism exists to measure a patient's and community's suitability to leverage these services.
This systematic review aims to evaluate the extent and nature of measuring the overall suitability of individuals and communities within the digital health landscape.
Database searches in February 2024 across PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, and IEEE Xplore yielded 1044 unique references. Two screening stages resulted in 10 articles that met all evaluation criteria for review inclusion.
This systematic review found a gap in the ability to holistically assess a patient's and community's suitability to access digital health services. Myriad indices and tools identify isolated factors contributing to digital health accessibility (e.g., broadband availability); however, no comprehensive mechanism adequately informs providers, policymakers, and researchers.
A comprehensive index that accurately reflects suitability for digital health services is needed. Index factors should include a combination of indicators related to socioeconomic status, digital accessibility, such as device and internet access, and social determinants of health. Together, these form the predominant driving factors related to one's ability to participate in digital health services.
数字健康服务的使用和普及程度持续增长,患者和医疗保健组织都从中受益。尽管如此,目前还没有机制来衡量患者和社区对利用这些服务的适宜性。
本系统评价旨在评估在数字健康领域中衡量个人和社区整体适宜性的程度和性质。
2024年2月在PubMed、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Embase和IEEE Xplore数据库中进行检索,共得到1044篇独特的参考文献。经过两个筛选阶段,最终有10篇文章符合纳入综述的所有评估标准。
本系统评价发现,在全面评估患者和社区使用数字健康服务的适宜性方面存在差距。众多指标和工具识别出了影响数字健康可及性的孤立因素(如宽带可用性);然而,没有一种全面的机制能为提供者、政策制定者和研究人员提供充分的信息。
需要一个能准确反映数字健康服务适宜性的综合指数。指数因素应包括与社会经济地位、数字可及性(如设备和互联网接入)以及健康的社会决定因素相关的指标组合。这些因素共同构成了与个人参与数字健康服务能力相关的主要驱动因素。