Suppr超能文献

如何衡量社区的数字健康适宜性?一项系统综述。

How is digital health suitability measured for communities? A systematic review.

作者信息

Geracitano John, Barron Luke, McSwain David, Khairat Saif

机构信息

Carolina Health Informatics Program, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Oct 3;10:20552076241288316. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288316. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital health services continue growing in usage and popularity, with patients and healthcare organizations benefiting from their use. Despite this, no mechanism exists to measure a patient's and community's suitability to leverage these services.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to evaluate the extent and nature of measuring the overall suitability of individuals and communities within the digital health landscape.

METHODS

Database searches in February 2024 across PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, and IEEE Xplore yielded 1044 unique references. Two screening stages resulted in 10 articles that met all evaluation criteria for review inclusion.

RESULTS

This systematic review found a gap in the ability to holistically assess a patient's and community's suitability to access digital health services. Myriad indices and tools identify isolated factors contributing to digital health accessibility (e.g., broadband availability); however, no comprehensive mechanism adequately informs providers, policymakers, and researchers.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive index that accurately reflects suitability for digital health services is needed. Index factors should include a combination of indicators related to socioeconomic status, digital accessibility, such as device and internet access, and social determinants of health. Together, these form the predominant driving factors related to one's ability to participate in digital health services.

摘要

背景

数字健康服务的使用和普及程度持续增长,患者和医疗保健组织都从中受益。尽管如此,目前还没有机制来衡量患者和社区对利用这些服务的适宜性。

目的

本系统评价旨在评估在数字健康领域中衡量个人和社区整体适宜性的程度和性质。

方法

2024年2月在PubMed、护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Embase和IEEE Xplore数据库中进行检索,共得到1044篇独特的参考文献。经过两个筛选阶段,最终有10篇文章符合纳入综述的所有评估标准。

结果

本系统评价发现,在全面评估患者和社区使用数字健康服务的适宜性方面存在差距。众多指标和工具识别出了影响数字健康可及性的孤立因素(如宽带可用性);然而,没有一种全面的机制能为提供者、政策制定者和研究人员提供充分的信息。

结论

需要一个能准确反映数字健康服务适宜性的综合指数。指数因素应包括与社会经济地位、数字可及性(如设备和互联网接入)以及健康的社会决定因素相关的指标组合。这些因素共同构成了与个人参与数字健康服务能力相关的主要驱动因素。

相似文献

1
How is digital health suitability measured for communities? A systematic review.
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 3;10:20552076241288316. doi: 10.1177/20552076241288316. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Development of the key performance indicators for digital health interventions: A scoping review.
Digit Health. 2023 Jan 22;9:20552076231152160. doi: 10.1177/20552076231152160. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
A scoping review of stroke services within the Philippines.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug 30;24(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11334-z.
10
Digital Health Literacy and Social Determinants of Health Affecting Telehealth Use by Athletic Trainers.
J Sport Rehabil. 2024 Jan 24;34(1):42-51. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2023-0069. Print 2025 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Most TikTok Videos Regarding the Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee Are Posted by Patients and Have Little Educational Value.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan 29;7(3):101101. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2025.101101. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

2
Disparities in spatial accessibility of primary care in Louisiana: From physical to virtual accessibility.
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;11:1154574. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1154574. eCollection 2023.
3
Characterizing digital access in pediatric urology.
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Oct;19(5):523.e1-523.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
4
Enhanced Two-Step Virtual Catchment Area (E2SVCA) model to measure telehealth accessibility.
Comput Urban Sci. 2023;3(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s43762-023-00092-z. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
5
Equity and behavioral digital health interventions: Strategies to improve benefit and reach.
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Jun 9;13(6):400-405. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad010.
7
The State of Telehealth Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Prim Care. 2022 Dec;49(4):517-530. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2022.04.002. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
8
Inequity in the Access to eHealth and Its Decomposition Case of Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;19(4):2340. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042340.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验