Nelson Lyndsay A, Reale Carrie, Anders Shilo, Beebe Russ, Rosenbloom S Trent, Hackstadt Amber, Harper Kryseana J, Mayberry Lindsay S, Cobb Jared G, Peterson Neeraja, Elasy Tom, Yu Zhihong, Martinez William
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
JAMIA Open. 2023 Apr 27;6(2):ooad030. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad030. eCollection 2023 Jul.
The aim of this study was to design and assess the formative usability of a novel patient portal intervention designed to empower patients with diabetes to initiate orders for diabetes-related monitoring and preventive services.
We used a user-centered Design Sprint methodology to create our intervention prototype and assess its usability with 3 rounds of iterative testing. Participants (5/round) were presented with the prototype and asked to perform common, standardized tasks using think-aloud procedures. A facilitator rated task performance using a scale: (1) completed with ease, (2) completed with difficulty, and (3) failed. Participants completed the System Usability Scale (SUS) scored 0-worst to 100-best. All testing occurred remotely via Zoom.
We identified 3 main categories of usability issues: distrust about the automated system, content concerns, and layout difficulties. Changes included improving clarity about the ordering process and simplifying language; however, design constraints inherent to the electronic health record system limited our ability to respond to all usability issues (eg, could not modify fixed elements in layout). Percent of tasks completed with ease across each round were 67%, 60%, and 80%, respectively. Average SUS scores were 87, 74, and 93, respectively. Across rounds, participants found the intervention valuable and appreciated the concept of patient-initiated ordering.
Through iterative user-centered design and testing, we improved the usability of the patient portal intervention. A tool that empowers patients to initiate orders for disease-specific services as part of their existing patient portal account has potential to enhance the completion of recommended health services and improve clinical outcomes.
本研究旨在设计并评估一种新型患者门户干预措施的形成性可用性,该干预措施旨在使糖尿病患者能够发起糖尿病相关监测和预防服务的订单。
我们采用以用户为中心的设计冲刺方法来创建干预原型,并通过三轮迭代测试评估其可用性。向参与者(每轮5名)展示原型,并要求他们使用出声思考程序执行常见的标准化任务。一名主持人使用以下量表对任务表现进行评分:(1)轻松完成,(2)有困难完成,(3)失败。参与者完成系统可用性量表(SUS),评分从0(最差)到100(最佳)。所有测试均通过Zoom远程进行。
我们确定了三类主要的可用性问题:对自动化系统的不信任、内容问题和布局困难。改进措施包括提高订购流程的清晰度并简化语言;然而,电子健康记录系统固有的设计限制了我们应对所有可用性问题的能力(例如,无法修改布局中的固定元素)。每轮轻松完成的任务百分比分别为67%、60%和80%。平均SUS得分分别为87、74和93。在各轮测试中,参与者认为该干预措施有价值,并赞赏患者发起订购的概念。
通过以用户为中心的迭代设计和测试,我们提高了患者门户干预措施的可用性。一种使患者能够在其现有患者门户账户中发起特定疾病服务订单的工具,有可能提高推荐健康服务的完成率并改善临床结果。