• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在重复的自我管理调查中改变问题顺序后,偶尔吸毒风险感知的突然峰值。

Abrupt peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use after changing the question order in a repeated self-administered survey.

机构信息

National School of Public Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Madrid, Spain.

The Biomedical Research Center Network for Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 14;11:971239. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.971239. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.971239
PMID:37124773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10140628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Question-order changes in repeated surveys can distort comparisons. We want to describe the evolution of drug risk perceptions among Spanish adolescents and assessing whether the 2006 peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use can be explained by question-order changes.

METHODS

The subjects were secondary students from a biennial national survey during 2000-2012. A one-off intervention was applied in 2006, replacing the two-adjacent items on perceived risk of occasional and regular use of each drug by non-adjacent items. Annual prevalence of high-risk perception were obtained for occasional and regular use of cannabis, heroin, cocaine and ecstasy. Subsequently, the 2006 percent level change (PC) in such were estimated prevalence using segmented Poisson regression, adjusting for various student and parent covariates.

RESULTS

The 2006 PC in prevalence of high-risk perception of occasional drug use ranged from +63% (heroin) to +83% (ecstasy). These PCs were very high in all considered subgroups. However, the 2006 PC in prevalence of high-risk perception of regular drug use ranged from 1% (heroin) to 12% (cannabis). The evolution of preventive interventions does not suggest alternative causal hypotheses for 2006 peaks other than question-order changes.

CONCLUSION

Within the cognitive heuristics framework, the 2006 spikes in perceived risk of occasional drug use were most likely due to a release of the anchor exerted by perceived risk of regular drug use over that of occasional use triggered by 2006 question-order changes. In repeated surveys it is inexcusable to pre-test the effect of any change in questionnaire format.

摘要

背景

在重复调查中改变问题的顺序会扭曲比较。我们想描述西班牙青少年对药物风险认知的演变,并评估 2006 年偶尔使用药物的风险感知峰值是否可以用问题顺序的变化来解释。

方法

研究对象为 2000-2012 年期间两年一次的全国性调查中的中学生。2006 年进行了一次性干预,用不相邻的项目替换了偶尔和经常使用每种药物的感知风险的两个相邻项目。获得了大麻、海洛因、可卡因和摇头丸偶尔和经常使用的高风险感知的年度流行率。随后,使用分段泊松回归估计了这些高风险感知的 2006 年百分比变化(PC),并调整了各种学生和家长协变量。

结果

偶尔使用药物的高风险感知的 2006 年 PC 从 63%(海洛因)到 83%(摇头丸)不等。在所有考虑的亚组中,这些 PC 都非常高。然而,经常使用药物的高风险感知的 2006 年 PC 从 1%(海洛因)到 12%(大麻)不等。预防干预措施的演变并不能为 2006 年的峰值提供除问题顺序变化之外的替代因果假设。

结论

在认知启发式框架内,偶尔使用药物的风险感知 2006 年的峰值很可能是由于 2006 年问题顺序变化引发的经常使用药物的风险感知对偶尔使用药物的风险感知的锚定作用的释放所致。在重复调查中,预先测试问卷格式任何变化的效果都是不可原谅的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/10140628/4e0a859d68f2/fpubh-11-971239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/10140628/4e0a859d68f2/fpubh-11-971239-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a05d/10140628/4e0a859d68f2/fpubh-11-971239-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Abrupt peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use after changing the question order in a repeated self-administered survey.在重复的自我管理调查中改变问题顺序后,偶尔吸毒风险感知的突然峰值。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 14;11:971239. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.971239. eCollection 2023.
2
[High-risk drug use: epidemiological pattern through hair testing in the forensic context].[高风险药物使用:法医背景下通过毛发检测的流行病学模式]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2019 Nov 26;93:e201911065.
3
Ecstasy and new patterns of drug use: a normal population study.摇头丸与新的吸毒模式:一项普通人群研究。
Addiction. 1999 Nov;94(11):1695-706. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.941116957.x.
4
Changes in and correlates of Australian public attitudes toward illicit drug use.澳大利亚公众对非法药物使用态度的变化及其相关因素。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Jul;41(5):1029-1040. doi: 10.1111/dar.13426. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
5
The effects of perceived quality on the behavioural economics of alcohol, amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine, and ecstasy purchases.感知质量对酒精、安非他命、大麻、可卡因和摇头丸购买行为经济学的影响。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Apr 1;94(1-3):183-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.11.014. Epub 2008 Jan 16.
6
Disruption to Australian heroin, methamphetamine, cocaine and ecstasy markets with the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions.随着 COVID-19 大流行及相关限制措施的实施,澳大利亚海洛因、冰毒、可卡因和摇头丸市场受到冲击。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Mar;113:103976. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103976. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
7
[Epidemiology of designer drug use in Spain].[西班牙新型毒品使用的流行病学]
Med Clin (Barc). 1997 Jan 18;108(2):54-61.
8
Self-Reported Substance Use With Clinician Interviewers Versus Self-Administered Surveys.自我报告的物质使用情况与临床访谈者相比,自我管理的调查。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2024 Jan;85(1):92-99. doi: 10.15288/jsad.23-00004. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
9
Pathways between ecstasy initiation and other drug use.摇头丸起始使用与其他药物使用之间的途径。
Addict Behav. 2007 Jul;32(7):1511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.11.003. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
10
Correlates of Ecstasy use in middle age and beyond.中年及中年以后摇头丸使用的相关因素。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2005 Jan;24(1):33-8. doi: 10.1080/09595230500124925.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence.重新评估并扩展欧洲新生儿健康护理标准:如何使参考标准与当前证据保持一致。
Children (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;11(2):179. doi: 10.3390/children11020179.

本文引用的文献

1
Behavioral biases and heuristics in perceptions of COVID-19 risks and prevention decisions.对 COVID-19 风险的感知和预防决策中的行为偏见和启发式。
Risk Anal. 2022 Dec;42(12):2671-2690. doi: 10.1111/risa.13882. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
2
Does risk perception motivate preventive behavior during a pandemic? A longitudinal study in the United States and China.风险感知是否能在大流行期间激发预防行为?一项对美国和中国的纵向研究。
Am Psychol. 2022 Jan;77(1):111-123. doi: 10.1037/amp0000885. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.
部分测量不变性:扩展和评估用于识别锚定项目的聚类方法
Appl Psychol Meas. 2021 Oct;45(7-8):477-493. doi: 10.1177/01466216211042809. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Age-varying time trends in cannabis- and alcohol-related risk perceptions 2002-2019.2002-2019 年大麻和酒精相关风险认知的年龄变化趋势。
Addict Behav. 2022 Jan;124:107091. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107091. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
5
Joint perceptions of the risk and availability of Cannabis in the United States, 2002-2018.2002-2018 年美国民众对大麻风险和可及性的共同认知。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Sep 1;226:108873. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108873. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
6
Tversky and Kahneman's Cognitive Illusions: Who Can Solve Them, and Why?特沃斯基和卡尼曼的认知错觉:谁能解决它们,以及原因何在?
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 12;12:584689. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584689. eCollection 2021.
7
"Tell Me How Much Your Friends Consume"-Personal, Behavioral, Social, and Attitudinal Factors Associated with Alcohol and Cannabis Use among European School Students.“告诉我你的朋友喝了多少”——与欧洲学生饮酒和使用大麻相关的个人、行为、社会和态度因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 10;18(4):1684. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041684.
8
Weight Reduction Behaviors Among European Adolescents-Changes From 2001/2002 to 2017/2018.欧洲青少年的减肥行为——2001/2002 年至 2017/2018 年的变化。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6S):S70-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.03.008.
9
How do ordered questions bias eyewitnesses?有序提问如何影响目击证人?
Memory. 2019 Aug;27(7):904-915. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1607388. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
Changing Perceptions of Harm of e-Cigarette vs Cigarette Use Among Adults in 2 US National Surveys From 2012 to 2017.2012 年至 2017 年,2 项美国全国调查中成年人对电子烟危害与香烟危害看法的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191047. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1047.