• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新评估并扩展欧洲新生儿健康护理标准:如何使参考标准与当前证据保持一致。

Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence.

作者信息

Geiger Isabel, Kostenzer Johanna, Matthäus Valerie, Mader Silke, Zimmermann Luc J I

机构信息

European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants (EFCNI), 81379 Munich, Germany.

Department of Paediatrics, Research School for Oncology and Reproduction (GROW), Maastricht UMC+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;11(2):179. doi: 10.3390/children11020179.

DOI:10.3390/children11020179
PMID:38397291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10887008/
Abstract

The European Standards of Care for Newborn Health (ESCNH) were launched in 2018. After three years, the first standards were reassessed and revised to align with current evidence. Moreover, new standards regarding emerging topics were developed. The aim of this paper is to outline the approach adopted for reassessing, revising and developing new standards for the ESCNH. We established a systematic approach to reassess the ESCNH including a public and an expert consultation. The public consultation was open to all stakeholders for feedback whereas the expert consultation followed a targeted consultation method. For developing new standards, a similar process to the original development was implemented. Overall, 20 standards were reassessed and six standards were developed. For the revision process, 23 experts were involved in the targeted consultation method and 253 questionnaires were completed via the open consultation. We demonstrated a systematic approach to update and extend reference standards, which can be applied by other developers of standards. Thereby, we highlighted that including a public and an expert consultation is crucial to improve quality and to ensure that all stakeholder perspectives are integrated.

摘要

《欧洲新生儿健康护理标准》(ESCNH)于2018年发布。三年后,对首批标准进行了重新评估和修订,以使其与当前证据保持一致。此外,还制定了关于新出现主题的新标准。本文旨在概述为重新评估、修订和制定ESCNH新标准所采用的方法。我们建立了一种系统的方法来重新评估ESCNH,包括公众咨询和专家咨询。公众咨询向所有利益相关者开放以征求反馈意见,而专家咨询则采用有针对性的咨询方法。对于制定新标准,实施了与最初制定过程类似的流程。总体而言,重新评估了20项标准,制定了6项标准。在修订过程中,23名专家参与了有针对性的咨询方法,通过公开咨询完成了253份问卷。我们展示了一种更新和扩展参考标准的系统方法,其他标准制定者也可应用该方法。因此,我们强调,纳入公众咨询和专家咨询对于提高质量以及确保整合所有利益相关者的观点至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4d/10887008/f3047a2c4852/children-11-00179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4d/10887008/808886f8b881/children-11-00179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4d/10887008/1d390e98fecb/children-11-00179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4d/10887008/f3047a2c4852/children-11-00179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4d/10887008/808886f8b881/children-11-00179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4d/10887008/1d390e98fecb/children-11-00179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac4d/10887008/f3047a2c4852/children-11-00179-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence.重新评估并扩展欧洲新生儿健康护理标准:如何使参考标准与当前证据保持一致。
Children (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;11(2):179. doi: 10.3390/children11020179.
2
Correction: Geiger et al. Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence. 2024, , 179.更正:盖格等人。重新评估和扩展欧洲新生儿健康护理标准:如何使参考标准与当前证据保持一致。2024年,,179。
Children (Basel). 2024 May 28;11(6):653. doi: 10.3390/children11060653.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Erratum: Eyestalk Ablation to Increase Ovarian Maturation in Mud Crabs.勘误:切除眼柄以增加泥蟹的卵巢成熟度。
J Vis Exp. 2023 May 26(195). doi: 10.3791/6561.
5
[Needs assessment to improve the applicability and methodological quality of a German S3 guideline].[提高德国S3指南适用性和方法学质量的需求评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Apr;131-132:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
6
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.一项反映社区利益相关者不同观点的肺癌研究议程:SEED方法的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.
7
Patient involvement in guidelines is poor five years after institute of medicine standards: review of guideline methodologies.在医学研究所制定标准五年后,患者在指南中的参与度仍然很低:指南方法学综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Oct 2;3:19. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0070-2. eCollection 2017.
8
European Standards of Care for Newborn Health-A project protocol.欧洲新生儿保健标准-项目方案。
Acta Paediatr. 2021 May;110(5):1433-1438. doi: 10.1111/apa.15712. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
9
ANZAED eating disorder treatment principles and general clinical practice and training standards.澳大利亚和新西兰饮食失调学会治疗原则及一般临床实践与培训标准
J Eat Disord. 2020 Nov 10;8(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40337-020-00341-0.
10
Information standards for recording alcohol use in electronic health records: findings from a national consultation.电子健康记录中酒精使用情况记录的信息标准:全国磋商的结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0612-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing neonatal resuscitation outcomes: bridging theory and practice.提高新生儿复苏效果:弥合理论与实践的差距
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Mar 19;184(4):258. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06087-8.
2
Study protocol for the development and pilot-testing of a Self-assessment tool for the implementation of the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health (ESCNH).欧洲新生儿健康护理标准(ESCNH)实施自我评估工具的开发与预测试研究方案
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Jan 20;9(1):e003008. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003008.
3
Correction: Geiger et al. Reassessing and Extending the European Standards of Care for Newborn Health: How to Keep Reference Standards in Line with Current Evidence. 2024, , 179.

本文引用的文献

1
Abrupt peaks in perceived risk of occasional drug use after changing the question order in a repeated self-administered survey.在重复的自我管理调查中改变问题顺序后,偶尔吸毒风险感知的突然峰值。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 14;11:971239. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.971239. eCollection 2023.
2
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth.欧洲复苏委员会指南 2021:新生儿复苏和支持婴儿出生时的过渡。
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:291-326. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
3
European Standards of Care for Newborn Health-A project protocol.
更正:盖格等人。重新评估和扩展欧洲新生儿健康护理标准:如何使参考标准与当前证据保持一致。2024年,,179。
Children (Basel). 2024 May 28;11(6):653. doi: 10.3390/children11060653.
欧洲新生儿保健标准-项目方案。
Acta Paediatr. 2021 May;110(5):1433-1438. doi: 10.1111/apa.15712. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
4
Are systematic review and guideline development tools useful? A Guidelines International Network survey of user preferences.系统评价和指南制定工具有用吗?国际指南网络关于用户偏好的调查。
JBI Evid Implement. 2020 Sep;18(3):345-352. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000226.
5
The Development of Clinical Guidelines and Guidance Statements by the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians: Update of Methods.美国医师学院临床指南委员会制定临床指南和指南声明的方法更新。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jun 18;170(12):863-870. doi: 10.7326/M18-3290. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial.问题顺序对核心结局集制定中结局优先级的影响:一项随机对照试验
Trials. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2405-6.
7
International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument.使用《指南与研究评价工具》对肿瘤学临床实践指南质量进行国际评估。
J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 15;22(10):2000-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.157.