Ear Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom
Ear Institute, University College London, London WC1X 8EE, United Kingdom.
J Neurosci. 2023 Jun 28;43(26):4856-4866. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0242-23.2023. Epub 2023 May 1.
Listening in noisy environments requires effort- the active engagement of attention and other cognitive abilities- as well as increased arousal. The ability to separately quantify the contribution of these components is key to understanding the dynamics of effort and how it may change across listening situations and in certain populations. We concurrently measured two types of ocular data in young participants (both sexes): pupil dilation (PD; thought to index arousal aspects of effort) and microsaccades (MS; hypothesized to reflect automatic visual exploratory sampling), while they performed a speech-in-noise task under high- (HL) and low- (LL) listening load conditions. Sentences were manipulated so that the behaviorally relevant information (keywords) appeared at the end (Experiment 1) or beginning (Experiment 2) of the sentence, resulting in different temporal demands on focused attention. In line with previous reports, PD effects were associated with increased dilation under load. We observed a sustained difference between HL and LL conditions, consistent with increased phasic and tonic arousal. Importantly we show that MS rate was also modulated by listening load. This was manifested as a reduced MS rate in HL relative to LL. Critically, in contrast to the sustained difference seen for PD, MS effects were localized in time, specifically during periods when demands on auditory attention were greatest. These results demonstrate that auditory selective attention interfaces with the mechanisms controlling MS generation, establishing MS as an informative measure, complementary to PD, with which to quantify the temporal dynamics of auditory attentional processing under effortful listening conditions. Listening effort, reflecting the "cognitive bandwidth" deployed to effectively process sound in adverse environments, contributes critically to listening success. Understanding listening effort and the processes involved in its allocation is a major challenge in auditory neuroscience. Here, we demonstrate that microsaccade rate can be used to index a specific subcomponent of listening effort, the allocation of instantaneous auditory attention, that is distinct from the modulation of arousal indexed by pupil dilation (currently the dominant measure of listening effort). These results reveal the push-pull process through which auditory attention interfaces with the (visual) attention network that controls microsaccades, establishing microsaccades as a powerful tool for measuring auditory attention and its deficits.
在嘈杂的环境中倾听需要付出努力——需要积极参与注意力和其他认知能力,以及提高警觉性。分别量化这些组成部分的贡献的能力是理解努力的动态以及它如何在不同的倾听情况和特定人群中变化的关键。我们同时测量了年轻参与者的两种类型的眼部数据(男女都有):瞳孔扩张(PD;被认为是努力的唤醒方面的指标)和微扫视(MS;假设反映自动视觉探索性采样),而他们在高(HL)和低(LL)听力负荷条件下执行语音噪声任务。句子被操纵,使得行为相关信息(关键词)出现在句子的末尾(实验 1)或开头(实验 2),从而对集中注意力有不同的时间要求。与之前的报告一致,PD 效应与负荷下的扩张增加有关。我们观察到 HL 和 LL 条件之间的持续差异,与增加的相位和紧张性唤醒一致。重要的是,我们表明 MS 率也受到听力负荷的调制。这表现为 HL 相对于 LL 的 MS 率降低。关键的是,与 PD 观察到的持续差异相反,MS 效应在时间上是局部的,特别是在听觉注意力需求最大的时候。这些结果表明,听觉选择性注意力与控制 MS 生成的机制接口,将 MS 确立为一种信息丰富的测量方法,与 PD 互补,用于量化努力倾听条件下听觉注意力处理的时间动态。倾听努力,反映了在不利环境中有效处理声音的“认知带宽”,对倾听成功至关重要。理解倾听努力及其分配过程是听觉神经科学的主要挑战。在这里,我们证明微扫视率可用于指示倾听努力的特定子成分,即即时听觉注意力的分配,这与瞳孔扩张(目前是倾听努力的主要测量指标)所调制的唤醒不同。这些结果揭示了听觉注意力与控制微扫视的(视觉)注意力网络接口的推拉过程,将微扫视确立为测量听觉注意力及其缺陷的有力工具。