• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦国家患者登记处中乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者基于新程序的癌症状态定义的有效性

The Validity of a New Procedure-Based Definition of Cancer Status in Patients with Breast-, Lung- and Colorectal Cancer in the Danish National Patient Registry.

作者信息

Nielsen Sebastian Kinnberg, Nouhravesh Nina, Jensen Mads Hashiba, Jensen Rawia Farah Gedde, Klein Mads Falk, Saghir Zaigham, Nielsen Dorte, Schou Morten, Lamberts Morten

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Surgery, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 25;15:483-491. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S401554. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S401554
PMID:37128596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10148644/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) provides unique epidemiological insight, but often lacks granular data. We propose a procedure-based definition of cancer status in patients with breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer, which can be applied to administrative health databases. New definitions of cancer status are needed as mortality and morbidity are closely linked to cancer status, yet most studies only use duration since cancer diagnosis as a severity marker. The aim of the study was to validate a new pragmatic definition.

METHODS

Medical journals of 600 patients, with breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer from the Department of Oncology at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. We defined active cancer as a cancer diagnosis, not followed by a potentially curative procedure within 6 months of the diagnosis. The remaining patients were characterized as having non-active cancer. This dichotomization was then compared to a cancer status assessment based on treatment received and paraclinical test such as their first post-procedural control scan. Based on this comparison, we calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) of our definitions of active and non-active cancer.

RESULTS

The calculated PPVs for active breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer were 87% (CI 95%: 0.74-0.99), 91% (CI 95%: 0.87-0.96) and 82% (CI 95%: 0.73-0.91). The PPVs for non-active breast-, lung- and colorectal cancer were 95% (CI 95%: 0.92-0.99), 91% (CI 95%: 0.82-0.99) and 73% (CI 95%: 0.66-0.81), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found an overall high PPV for both active and non-active cancer across all three types of cancer.

摘要

背景/目的:丹麦国家患者登记处(DNPR)提供了独特的流行病学见解,但往往缺乏详细数据。我们提出了一种基于程序的乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者癌症状态定义,该定义可应用于行政卫生数据库。由于死亡率和发病率与癌症状态密切相关,因此需要新的癌症状态定义,但大多数研究仅将自癌症诊断以来的持续时间用作严重程度指标。本研究的目的是验证一种新的实用定义。

方法

对来自赫勒夫-根措夫特医院肿瘤科的600例乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者的医学期刊进行回顾性研究。我们将活动性癌症定义为癌症诊断后6个月内未进行潜在治愈性手术的情况。其余患者被归类为非活动性癌症。然后将这种二分法与基于所接受治疗和辅助检查(如首次术后对照扫描)的癌症状态评估进行比较。基于此比较,我们计算了活动性和非活动性癌症定义的阳性预测值(PPV)。

结果

计算得出的活动性乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌的PPV分别为87%(95%置信区间:0.74 - 0.99)、91%(95%置信区间:0.87 - 0.96)和82%(95%置信区间:0.73 - 0.91)。非活动性乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌的PPV分别为95%(95%置信区间:0.92 - 0.99)、91%(95%置信区间:0.82 - 0.99)和73%(95%置信区间:0.66 - 0.81)。

结论

我们发现,在所有三种癌症类型中,活动性和非活动性癌症的总体PPV都很高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62d/10148644/e86b34a5a680/CLEP-15-483-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62d/10148644/e720680e2c2c/CLEP-15-483-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62d/10148644/3e7e537dd201/CLEP-15-483-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62d/10148644/e86b34a5a680/CLEP-15-483-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62d/10148644/e720680e2c2c/CLEP-15-483-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62d/10148644/3e7e537dd201/CLEP-15-483-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d62d/10148644/e86b34a5a680/CLEP-15-483-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Validity of a New Procedure-Based Definition of Cancer Status in Patients with Breast-, Lung- and Colorectal Cancer in the Danish National Patient Registry.丹麦国家患者登记处中乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌患者基于新程序的癌症状态定义的有效性
Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 25;15:483-491. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S401554. eCollection 2023.
2
The Validity of Registered Synchronous Peritoneal Metastases from Colorectal Cancer in the Danish Medical Registries.丹麦医学登记处中结直肠癌登记同步性腹膜转移的有效性
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 27;12:333-343. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S238193. eCollection 2020.
3
The Positive Predictive Value of Hip Fracture Diagnoses and Surgical Procedure Codes in the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry.丹麦多学科髋部骨折登记处及丹麦国家患者登记处中髋部骨折诊断和外科手术编码的阳性预测值
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb 4;12:123-131. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S238722. eCollection 2020.
4
Validity of first-time diagnoses of congenital epidermolysis bullosa in the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Pathology Registry.丹麦国家患者登记处和丹麦病理登记处中先天性大疱性表皮松解症首次诊断的有效性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan 17;11:115-124. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S184742. eCollection 2019.
5
The Validity of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Diagnoses in the Danish Patient Registry and the Danish Stroke Registry.丹麦患者登记处和丹麦卒中登记处中脑出血诊断的有效性
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Dec 1;12:1313-1325. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S267583. eCollection 2020.
6
Positive predictive value of peptic ulcer diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry.丹麦国家患者登记处中消化性溃疡诊断编码的阳性预测值。
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 May 5;9:261-266. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S132628. eCollection 2017.
7
Validity of First-Time Diagnoses of Inherited Ichthyosis in the Danish National Patient Registry and the Danish Pathology Registry.丹麦国家患者登记处和丹麦病理登记处中遗传性鱼鳞病首次诊断的有效性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 19;12:651-657. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S232956. eCollection 2020.
8
Validity of the coding for herpes simplex encephalitis in the Danish National Patient Registry.丹麦国家患者登记处中单纯疱疹性脑炎编码的有效性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May 31;8:133-40. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S104379. eCollection 2016.
9
Validity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: A Population-Based Study from the North Denmark Region.丹麦国家患者登记处炎症性肠病诊断的有效性:一项来自北丹麦地区的基于人群的研究。
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Oct 6;14:1099-1109. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S378003. eCollection 2022.
10
Validity and completeness of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in the nationwide DANBIO clinical register and the Danish National Patient Registry.全国性DANBIO临床登记册和丹麦国家患者登记册中类风湿性关节炎诊断的有效性和完整性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 29;9:627-632. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S141438. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognosis of acute coronary syndrome stratified by cancer type and status - a nationwide cohort study.基于癌症类型和状态分层的急性冠状动脉综合征预后 - 一项全国性队列研究。
Am Heart J. 2023 Feb;256:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
Time to surgery and survival in breast cancer.乳腺癌的手术时间与生存时间。
BMC Surg. 2022 Nov 11;22(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01835-1.
3
High Validity of the Danish National Patient Registry for Systemic Anticancer Treatment Registration from 2009 to 2019.丹麦国家患者登记处对2009年至2019年系统性抗癌治疗登记的高有效性
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 24;13:1085-1094. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S332776. eCollection 2021.
4
Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview.2020年癌症统计数据概述。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588.
5
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Time to surgery in thoracic cancers and prioritization during COVID-19: a systematic review.胸段癌症的手术时机及 COVID-19 期间的优先级:一项系统评价
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Nov;12(11):6640-6654. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-2400.
7
Time to Surgery and Colon Cancer Survival in the United States.美国的手术时间与结肠癌的生存情况。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):1025-1031. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003745.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention in cancer patients: a report of the prevalence and outcomes in the United States.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在癌症患者中的应用:美国的流行率和结局报告。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 7;40(22):1790-1800. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy769.
9
Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials.新辅助化疗与辅助化疗治疗早期乳腺癌的长期疗效:来自十个随机试验的个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):27-39. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30777-5. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Categorization of patients as having provoked or unprovoked venous thromboembolism: guidance from the SSC of ISTH.将患者分类为有诱因或无诱因静脉血栓栓塞:国际血栓与止血学会科学标准化委员会的指南
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jul;14(7):1480-3. doi: 10.1111/jth.13336. Epub 2016 Jun 7.