Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730, China.
Department of Laboratory Medicine,, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Shuaifu Yuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 2;23(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01898-5.
Despite the extensive research on data mining algorithms, there is still a lack of a standard protocol to evaluate the performance of the existing algorithms. Therefore, the study aims to provide a novel procedure that combines data mining algorithms and simplified preprocessing to establish reference intervals (RIs), with the performance of five algorithms assessed objectively as well.
Two data sets were derived from the population undergoing a physical examination. Hoffmann, Bhattacharya, Expectation Maximum (EM), kosmic, and refineR algorithms combined with two-step data preprocessing respectively were implemented in the Test data set to establish RIs for thyroid-related hormones. Algorithm-calculated RIs were compared with the standard RIs calculated from the Reference data set in which reference individuals were selected following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Objective assessment of the methods is implemented by the bias ratio (BR) matrix.
RIs of thyroid-related hormones are established. There is a high consistency between TSH RIs established by the EM algorithm and the standard TSH RIs (BR = 0.063), although EM algorithms seems to perform poor on other hormones. RIs calculated by Hoffmann, Bhattacharya, and refineR methods for free and total triiodo-thyronine, free and total thyroxine respectively are close and match the standard RIs.
An effective approach for objectively evaluating the performance of the algorithm based on the BR matrix is established. EM algorithm combined with simplified preprocessing can handle data with significant skewness, but its performance is limited in other scenarios. The other four algorithms perform well for data with Gaussian or near-Gaussian distribution. Using the appropriate algorithm based on the data distribution characteristics is recommended.
尽管在数据挖掘算法方面已经进行了广泛的研究,但仍然缺乏评估现有算法性能的标准协议。因此,本研究旨在提供一种新的程序,将数据挖掘算法与简化的预处理相结合,建立参考区间(RI),并客观评估五种算法的性能。
从接受体检的人群中获得两个数据集。Hoffmann、Bhattacharya、Expectation Maximum(EM)、kosmic 和 refineR 算法分别与两步数据预处理相结合,用于建立甲状腺相关激素的 RI。算法计算的 RI 与从参考数据集中计算的标准 RI 进行比较,其中参考个体是根据严格的纳入和排除标准选择的。通过偏差比(BR)矩阵来实现对方法的客观评估。
建立了甲状腺相关激素的 RI。EM 算法建立的 TSH RI 与标准 TSH RI 高度一致(BR=0.063),尽管 EM 算法在其他激素上的表现似乎较差。Hoffmann、Bhattacharya 和 refineR 方法分别计算的游离和总三碘甲状腺原氨酸、游离和总甲状腺素的 RI 接近且与标准 RI 相匹配。
建立了一种基于 BR 矩阵客观评估算法性能的有效方法。EM 算法结合简化的预处理可以处理具有显著偏度的数据,但在其他情况下其性能有限。其他四种算法对于具有高斯或近似高斯分布的数据表现良好。建议根据数据分布特征选择合适的算法。