Suppr超能文献

采用手动和自动间接方法验证甲状腺激素参考区间:霍夫曼法、KOSMIC法和refineR法的比较

Verification of Reference Interval of Thyroid Hormones With Manual and Automated Indirect Approaches: Comparison of Hoffman, KOSMIC and refineR Methods.

作者信息

Agaravatt Ashishkumar, Kansara Gaurav, Khubchandani Asha, Sanghani Hiren, Patel Shailesh, Parchwani Deepak

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, PDU (Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay) Medical College, Rajkot, IND.

Department of Biochemistry, Dr. Kiran C. Patel Medical College and Research Institute, Bharuch, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 May 15;15(5):e39066. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39066. eCollection 2023 May.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The interpretation of quantitative test results requires the availability of appropriate reference intervals (RIs). Every laboratory has been advised by scientific literature and reagent manufacturers to establish RIs for all analytes. Measuring RIs using direct methods is very costly, and it poses ethical and practical challenges. To overcome these challenges, indirect methods, such as Hoffman, and newer automated approaches, such as KOSMIC and refineR, are used to verify RIs for thyroid hormones.

OBJECTIVE

To verify RIs for thyroid hormones in adult patients using Hoffman, KOSMIC and refineR methods and to compare these with reference ranges given in kit literature or standard textbooks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The observed values (results) of thyroid hormone were collected from the LIS (Laboratory Information System) of the Biochemistry Department at the B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital in Ahmedabad between 1 January 2021 and 31 May 2022. Hoffman, KOSMIC and refineR methods were used to verify the RIs. The computerised Hoffman approach, which Katayev et al. describe, is a simple method for determining RI from hospital data. Zierk et al. pre-validated and suggested the KOSMIC method based on Python programming, whereas refineR was proposed by Tatjana et al. based on R programming language.

RESULTS

Hoffman, KOSMIC and refineR's indirect RI techniques revealed comparable results with kit literature in free T3 and T4, whereas higher upper reference limits of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) compared to kit literature were observed with KOSMIC and refineR methods. However, the computerised Hoffman method revealed comparable results with TSH also.

CONCLUSION

Indirect approaches, such as Hoffman, KOSMIC and refineR, provide reliable RI verification for free T3 and T4 utilising patient samples obtained from LIS. However, the manual Hoffman method provides reliable RI verification for TSH data derived from the hospital population as compared to automated approaches, such as KOSMIC and refineR.

摘要

引言

定量检测结果的解读需要合适的参考区间(RI)。科学文献和试剂制造商已建议每个实验室为所有分析物建立参考区间。使用直接方法测量参考区间成本非常高,并且带来伦理和实际挑战。为克服这些挑战,人们采用间接方法(如霍夫曼法)以及更新的自动化方法(如KOSMIC法和refineR法)来验证甲状腺激素的参考区间。

目的

使用霍夫曼法、KOSMIC法和refineR法验证成年患者甲状腺激素的参考区间,并将这些结果与试剂盒说明书或标准教科书中给出的参考范围进行比较。

材料与方法

2021年1月1日至2022年5月31日期间,从艾哈迈达巴德市BJ医学院和市民医院生物化学科的实验室信息系统(LIS)中收集甲状腺激素的观测值(结果)。使用霍夫曼法、KOSMIC法和refineR法验证参考区间。Katayev等人描述的计算机化霍夫曼方法是一种从医院数据确定参考区间的简单方法。Zierk等人基于Python编程对KOSMIC方法进行了预验证并提出该方法,而refineR方法是Tatjana等人基于R编程语言提出的。

结果

霍夫曼法、KOSMIC法和refineR法的间接参考区间技术在游离T3和T4方面显示出与试剂盒说明书相当的结果,而KOSMIC法和refineR法观察到促甲状腺激素(TSH)的参考上限高于试剂盒说明书。然而,计算机化霍夫曼方法在TSH方面也显示出相当的结果。

结论

霍夫曼法、KOSMIC法和refineR法等间接方法利用从LIS获得的患者样本,为游离T3和T4提供可靠的参考区间验证。然而,与KOSMIC法和refineR法等自动化方法相比,手动霍夫曼方法为来自医院人群的TSH数据提供可靠的参考区间验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d627/10267605/4a81e88d8c94/cureus-0015-00000039066-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验