• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用现有的荷兰质量登记临床信息模型,重复使用数据并遵循 COUMT 范式。

Using Existing Clinical Information Models for Dutch Quality Registries to Reuse Data and Follow COUMT Paradigm.

机构信息

Cirka BV, Healthcare Strategy and Innovation, Zeist, The Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, LUMC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):326-336. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767681. Epub 2023 May 3.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1767681
PMID:37137338
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10156444/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reuse of health care data for various purposes, such as the care process, for quality measurement, research, and finance, will become increasingly important in the future; therefore, "Collect Once Use Many Times" (COUMT). Clinical information models (CIMs) can be used for content standardization. Data collection for national quality registries (NQRs) often requires manual data entry or batch processing. Preferably, NQRs collect required data by extracting data recorded during the health care process and stored in the electronic health record.

OBJECTIVES

The first objective of this study was to analyze the level of coverage of data elements in NQRs with developed Dutch CIMs (DCIMs). The second objective was to analyze the most predominant DCIMs, both in terms of the coverage of data elements as well as in their prevalence across existing NQRs.

METHODS

For the first objective, a mapping method was used which consisted of six steps, ranging from a description of the clinical pathway to a detailed mapping of data elements. For the second objective, the total number of data elements that matched with a specific DCIM was counted and divided by the total number of evaluated data elements.

RESULTS

An average of 83.0% (standard deviation: 11.8%) of data elements in studied NQRs could be mapped to existing DCIMs . In total, 5 out of 100 DCIMs were needed to map 48.6% of the data elements.

CONCLUSION

This study substantiates the potential of using existing DCIMs for data collection in Dutch NQRs and gives direction to further implementation of DCIMs. The developed method is applicable to other domains. For NQRs, implementation should start with the five DCIMs that are most prevalently used in the NQRs. Furthermore, a national agreement on the leading principle of COUMT for the use and implementation for DCIMs and (inter)national code lists is needed.

摘要

背景

未来,出于医疗流程、质量测量、研究和财务等各种目的,重复使用医疗保健数据将变得越来越重要;因此,提出了“一次采集、多次使用”(Collect Once Use Many Times,COUMT)。临床信息模型(Clinical Information Model,CIM)可用于内容标准化。国家质量登记处(National Quality Registries,NQR)的数据收集通常需要手动数据录入或批处理。理想情况下,NQR 通过提取记录在电子健康记录中的医疗流程中记录的数据来收集所需的数据。

目的

本研究的首要目标是分析使用荷兰开发的临床信息模型(Dutch Clinical Information Model,DCIM)的 NQR 中数据元素的涵盖程度。第二个目标是分析最主要的 DCIM,既要考虑数据元素的涵盖程度,也要考虑其在现有 NQR 中的流行程度。

方法

对于第一个目标,使用了一种映射方法,包括六个步骤,从临床路径的描述到数据元素的详细映射。对于第二个目标,统计与特定 DCIM 匹配的数据元素的总数,并将其除以评估的数据元素总数。

结果

在所研究的 NQR 中,平均 83.0%(标准差:11.8%)的数据元素可以映射到现有的 DCIM 中。总共需要 5 个 DCIM 来映射 48.6%的数据元素。

结论

本研究证实了在荷兰 NQR 中使用现有 DCIM 进行数据采集的潜力,并为进一步实施 DCIM 提供了方向。所开发的方法适用于其他领域。对于 NQR,应从在 NQR 中使用最广泛的 5 个 DCIM 开始实施。此外,还需要就 COUMT 的使用和实施 DCIM 以及(国际)代码列表的主导原则达成国家协议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/167bc862cb24/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/c57f9aa0006a/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/70c2016ca37e/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/321a7e3660e2/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/2fc84a401db6/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/167bc862cb24/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/c57f9aa0006a/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/70c2016ca37e/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/321a7e3660e2/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/2fc84a401db6/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbd5/10156444/167bc862cb24/10-1055-s-0043-1767681-i202210ra0271-5.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Existing Clinical Information Models for Dutch Quality Registries to Reuse Data and Follow COUMT Paradigm.利用现有的荷兰质量登记临床信息模型,重复使用数据并遵循 COUMT 范式。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):326-336. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767681. Epub 2023 May 3.
2
One size fits none - a qualitative study investigating nine national quality registries' conditions for use in quality improvement, research and interaction with patients.一种尺码不适合所有人——一项定性研究,调查九个国家质量登记处用于质量改进、研究以及与患者互动的条件。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3621-9.
3
Using aggregated data from Swedish national quality registries as tools to describe health conditions of older adults with complex needs.利用瑞典国家质量登记处的汇总数据作为工具,描述有复杂需求的老年人的健康状况。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 May;33(5):1297-1306. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01629-6. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
4
Collection and use of EQ-5D for follow-up, decision-making, and quality improvement in health care - the case of the Swedish National Quality Registries.在医疗保健领域将EQ-5D用于随访、决策制定及质量改进——以瑞典国家质量登记处为例
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2020 Sep 16;4(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s41687-020-00231-8.
5
Quality indicators and their regular use in clinical practice: results from a survey among users of two cardiovascular National Registries in Sweden.质量指标及其在临床实践中的常规应用:瑞典两个心血管国家注册中心用户的调查结果
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Dec 1;30(10):786-792. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy107.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Collect Once, Use Many Times: End-Users Don't Practice What They Preach.一次性收集,多次使用:终端用户言行不一。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;228:252-6.
8
The Educational Impact of Implementing National Quality Registries in Sweden-A National Collaboration Project.瑞典实施国家质量登记处的教育影响——一项国家合作项目
Qual Manag Health Care. 2019 Oct/Dec;28(4):222-228. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000229.
9
Strong development of research based on national quality registries in Sweden.瑞典基于国家质量登记处的研究得到了大力发展。
Ups J Med Sci. 2019 Jan;124(1):9-11. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1520761. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
10
Depicting the interplay between organisational tiers in the use of a national quality registry to develop quality of care in Sweden.描绘瑞典利用国家质量登记册提高医疗质量过程中各组织层级之间的相互作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 25;15:519. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1188-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges for Data Quality in the Clinical Data Life Cycle: Systematic Review.临床数据生命周期中数据质量面临的挑战:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 23;27:e60709. doi: 10.2196/60709.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Structured and Standardized Documentation on Documentation Quality; a Multicenter, Retrospective Study.结构化和标准化文档对文档质量的影响:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Syst. 2022 May 27;46(7):46. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01837-9.
2
Treatment Outcome Trends for Non-Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study.未破裂腹主动脉瘤的治疗结局趋势:一项全国性前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;63(2):275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.08.019. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
3
On the Annotation of Health Care Pathways to Allow the Application of Care-Plans That Generate Data for Multiple Purposes.
关于医疗保健路径的注释,以允许应用能生成多用途数据的护理计划。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Sep 8;3:688218. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.688218. eCollection 2021.
4
The Dutch Lung Cancer Audit: Nationwide quality of care evaluation of lung cancer patients.荷兰肺癌审计:肺癌患者全国护理质量评估
Lung Cancer. 2020 Nov;149:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.011. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
5
Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit: automated extraction of colonoscopy data for quality assessment and improvement.荷兰胃肠内镜审计:自动提取结肠镜数据以进行质量评估和改进。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):154-162.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
6
How to improve patient safety and quality of care in breast implant surgery? First outcomes from the Dutch Breast Implant Registry (2015-2017).如何提高乳房植入手术中的患者安全性和护理质量?荷兰乳房植入物注册中心(2015-2017 年)的初步结果。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Oct;72(10):1607-1615. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.023. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
7
The Dutch Acute Stroke Audit: Benchmarking acute stroke care in the Netherlands.荷兰急性卒中审计:荷兰急性卒中护理的基准评估
Eur Stroke J. 2018 Dec;3(4):361-368. doi: 10.1177/2396987318787695. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
The Dutch Hip Fracture Audit: evaluation of the quality of multidisciplinary hip fracture care in the Netherlands.荷兰髋部骨折审核:评估荷兰多学科髋部骨折治疗质量。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Mar 1;14(1):28. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0576-3.
9
National quality registries: how to improve the quality of data?国家质量登记处:如何提高数据质量?
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(Suppl 29):S3490-S3499. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.146.
10
Lessons learned from the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing: the Dutch model for quality assurance in lung cancer treatment.从荷兰临床审计研究所汲取的经验教训:荷兰肺癌治疗质量保证模式。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(Suppl 29):S3472-S3485. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.04.56.