• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰胃肠内镜审计:自动提取结肠镜数据以进行质量评估和改进。

Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit: automated extraction of colonoscopy data for quality assessment and improvement.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):154-162.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.052
PMID:32057727
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The importance of having quality assessment, assurance, and improvement tools in health care is increasingly recognized. However, the additional associated administration burden progressively interferes with the structural implementation and adoption of such tools, especially when it concerns high-volume procedures such as colonoscopies. The development of the Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit (DGEA), a registry with automated extraction of colonoscopy quality data, and its first results are described.

METHODS

In close cooperation with commercial endoscopy reporting systems and a national histopathology database, healthcare professionals performing colonoscopies initiated a quality registry that extracts data from its core hospital resource or histology database without manual interference of the healthcare providers. Data extracted consisted of patient age, gender, indication of the colonoscopy, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, Boston Bowel Preparation Score, and cecal intubation; for the colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical test in the colorectal cancer screening program, other data were polyp detection rate, which was available for all 48 hospitals or endoscopy centers, and adenoma detection rate, which was available for 26 hospitals or endoscopy centers.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2016 and March 31, 2019, 48 hospitals or endoscopy centers voluntarily participated in the DGEA, and 275,017 unique patients with 313,511 colonoscopies were registered. Overall missing values were limited to <1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that it is feasible to deploy a quality registry collecting uniform data without additional administration burden for healthcare professionals.

摘要

背景和目的

越来越多的人认识到,医疗保健领域拥有质量评估、保证和改进工具的重要性。然而,额外的管理负担逐渐干扰了这些工具的结构实施和采用,特别是当涉及到结肠镜检查等高容量程序时。本文描述了荷兰胃肠内镜审核(DGEA)的发展,这是一个具有自动提取结肠镜质量数据功能的登记处,以及它的初步结果。

方法

在与商业内镜报告系统和国家组织病理学数据库密切合作的基础上,进行结肠镜检查的医疗保健专业人员启动了一个质量登记处,该登记处从其核心医院资源或组织病理学数据库中提取数据,而无需医疗保健提供者的手动干预。提取的数据包括患者年龄、性别、结肠镜检查指征、美国麻醉医师协会评分、波士顿肠道准备评分和盲肠插管;对于结直肠癌筛查计划中粪便免疫化学检测阳性后的结肠镜检查,其他数据包括息肉检出率,所有 48 家医院或内镜中心都可获得该数据,腺瘤检出率,26 家医院或内镜中心可获得该数据。

结果

2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日,48 家医院或内镜中心自愿参与了 DGEA,共登记了 275017 名接受了 313511 次结肠镜检查的独特患者。总体缺失值限制在<1%。

结论

本研究结果表明,部署一个收集统一数据的质量登记处而不会给医疗保健专业人员带来额外管理负担是可行的。

相似文献

1
Dutch Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Audit: automated extraction of colonoscopy data for quality assessment and improvement.荷兰胃肠内镜审计:自动提取结肠镜数据以进行质量评估和改进。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):154-162.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.052. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
2
Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry.荷兰结肠镜检查操作的持续监测:全国登记处的初步结果。
Endoscopy. 2022 May;54(5):488-495. doi: 10.1055/a-1556-5914. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Case-mix adjustment to compare colonoscopy performance between endoscopy centers: a nationwide registry study.通过病例组合调整比较各内镜中心的结肠镜检查表现:一项全国性登记研究
Endoscopy. 2022 May;54(5):455-462. doi: 10.1055/a-1637-9651. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.医院之间盲肠插管和腺瘤检测情况的比较可为提高结肠镜检查质量提供动力。
Endoscopy. 2015 Aug;47(8):703-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391968. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
6
Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication.根据适应证的不同,结肠镜检查操作指标存在差异。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;18(5):1216-1223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.035. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
7
The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.南非威特沃特斯兰德大学唐纳德·戈登医学中心结肠镜检查的“内幕”:门诊内镜科室的实践审核。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Nov 27;110(12):1186-1190. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i12.14419.
8
Quality assurance of colonoscopy within the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening program.荷兰国家结直肠癌筛查计划中结肠镜检查的质量保证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jan;89(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.011. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.在奥地利,高质量的结肠镜筛查并不取决于内镜医师的专业或检查地点。
Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390910. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
10
Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.筛查结肠镜检查的质量指标、结肠镜检查医师的表现及随后发生间隔期结直肠癌的风险:一项系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Nov;17(11):2265-2300. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003927.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of an Automated, Real-time Adenoma Detection Rate and Colonoscopy Quality Metrics Calculator.自动化实时腺瘤检出率及结肠镜检查质量指标计算器的开发与验证
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;26(1):2-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
2
Sustained success in endoscopic performance demonstrated by the Irish National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Programme.爱尔兰国家内镜质量改进计划所展示的内镜操作持续成功。
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Feb 26;13:a25209965. doi: 10.1055/a-2520-9965. eCollection 2025.
3
Obstacles and drivers in the adoption of Standardized Structured Reporting (SSR): insights from pathologists.
采用标准化结构化报告(SSR)的障碍与驱动因素:病理学家的见解
Virchows Arch. 2025 Jan 7. doi: 10.1007/s00428-024-04012-2.
4
Barriers against Implementation of European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Performance Measures for Colonoscopy in Clinical Practice.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术相关操作技术的欧洲指南:经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 19;60(7):1166. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071166.
5
Development, quality, and influencing factors of colonoscopy in China: results from the national census in 2013 and 2020.中国结肠镜检查的发展、质量及影响因素:2013年和2020年全国普查结果
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 22;13:1276520. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1276520. eCollection 2023.
6
Using Existing Clinical Information Models for Dutch Quality Registries to Reuse Data and Follow COUMT Paradigm.利用现有的荷兰质量登记临床信息模型,重复使用数据并遵循 COUMT 范式。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):326-336. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767681. Epub 2023 May 3.
7
Prioritisation of colonoscopy services in colorectal cancer screening programmes to minimise impact of COVID-19 pandemic on predicted cancer burden: A comparative modelling study.在结直肠癌筛查计划中优先考虑结肠镜检查服务,以最大程度减少 COVID-19 大流行对预测癌症负担的影响:一项比较建模研究。
J Med Screen. 2022 Jun;29(2):72-83. doi: 10.1177/09691413211056777. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
8
ESGE quality parameters in colonoscopy: How to ensure their adoption?结肠镜检查中的欧洲胃肠内镜学会(ESGE)质量参数:如何确保其应用?
Endosc Int Open. 2021 Sep 16;9(10):E1463-E1465. doi: 10.1055/a-1486-6788. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Predicting endoscopic activity recovery in England after COVID-19: a national analysis.预测英格兰 COVID-19 后内镜活动的恢复情况:全国性分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 May;6(5):381-390. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00058-3. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
10
Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement.克服胃肠道内镜质量措施传播和实施的障碍:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)和联合欧洲胃肠病学(UEG)立场声明。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Feb;9(1):120-126. doi: 10.1177/2050640620981366. Epub 2021 Feb 10.