• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传咨询监督自我效能感量表的编制及初步验证。

Creation and initial validation of a genetic counseling supervisory self-efficacy scale.

机构信息

Division of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2023 Oct;32(5):1018-1031. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1709. Epub 2023 May 3.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1709
PMID:37138448
Abstract

Fieldwork supervision is the "signature pedagogy" for training genetic counseling students, ensuring that students have the experience necessary to become minimally competent genetic counselors. According to the National Society of Genetic Counselors 2022 Professional Status Survey, roughly 40% of genetic counselors serve as supervisors for genetic counseling graduate students. Despite fieldwork supervision being essential for training, there are currently no validated supervision skill assessment tools for genetic counseling fieldwork supervisors to use for professional development. While a self-efficacy scale for genetic counselors currently exists, a comprehensive self-efficacy scale for genetic counseling supervision skills does not. The purpose of the study was to develop and validate a genetic counseling supervisory self-efficacy scale (GCSSES). This study was comparative, quantitative, and cross-sectional, with data collected via an online questionnaire which assessed supervision self-efficacy (95 items), derived from 154 published GC supervision competencies, demographics (5), experience (9), and supervisory development (18), using the Psychotherapy Supervisory Development Scale (PSDS). A total of 119 board-certified genetic counselors completed the survey. Factor analysis eliminated 40 items due to insufficient factor loading, and item-item correlation eliminated one item with elevated inter-item correlation, leaving 54 items on the finalized GCSSES. Exploratory factor analysis derived four GCSSES factors, which accounted for 65% of the variance in the scale: (a) Goal Setting, Feedback, and Evaluation; (b) Complex Aspects of Supervision; (c) Conflict Resolution; and (d) Working Alliance. Preliminary analyses show the GCSSES has high reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.99). Positive correlations between experience variables and supervisory self-efficacy were identified. A 54 item GCSSES was developed by this study. The GCSSES may serve as a tool for genetic counseling supervisors and graduate programs to assess skills, monitor professional development, and target training. A genetic counseling supervisory self-efficacy scale can also be used in future studies regarding training of genetic counseling supervisors.

摘要

实地监督是培训遗传咨询师的“标志性教学法”,确保学生具备成为基本合格遗传咨询师所需的经验。根据 2022 年全国遗传咨询师协会专业状况调查,大约 40%的遗传咨询师担任遗传咨询研究生的导师。尽管实地监督对于培训至关重要,但目前还没有经过验证的遗传咨询实地监督技能评估工具供遗传咨询实地监督使用,以促进专业发展。虽然目前有遗传咨询师的自我效能量表,但没有全面的遗传咨询监督技能自我效能量表。本研究的目的是开发和验证遗传咨询监督自我效能量表(GCSSES)。本研究采用比较、定量和横断面研究方法,通过在线问卷收集数据,评估监督自我效能(95 项),源自 154 项已发表的 GC 监督能力、人口统计学(5 项)、经验(9 项)和监督发展(18 项),使用心理治疗监督发展量表(PSDS)。共有 119 名经董事会认证的遗传咨询师完成了调查。由于因子负荷不足,因子分析排除了 40 个项目,由于项目间相关性较高,项目分析排除了一个项目,最终留下了 54 个项目。探索性因素分析得出了 GCSSES 的四个因素,占量表方差的 65%:(a)目标设定、反馈和评估;(b)监督的复杂方面;(c)冲突解决;(d)工作联盟。初步分析表明,GCSSES 具有较高的可靠性和内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.99)。经验变量与监督自我效能之间存在正相关。本研究开发了一个 54 项的 GCSSES。GCSSES 可作为遗传咨询导师和研究生课程评估技能、监测专业发展和确定培训目标的工具。遗传咨询监督自我效能量表也可用于未来关于遗传咨询导师培训的研究。

相似文献

1
Creation and initial validation of a genetic counseling supervisory self-efficacy scale.遗传咨询监督自我效能感量表的编制及初步验证。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Oct;32(5):1018-1031. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1709. Epub 2023 May 3.
2
Genetic Counseling Supervisors' Self-Efficacy for Select Clinical Supervision Competencies.遗传咨询主管对特定临床督导能力的自我效能感。
J Genet Couns. 2016 Apr;25(2):344-58. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9865-1. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
3
The impact of supervision training on genetic counselor supervisory identity development.督导培训对遗传咨询师督导身份发展的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2014 Dec;23(6):1056-65. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9730-7. Epub 2014 May 22.
4
Development and Validation of the Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES).遗传咨询自我效能量表(GCSES)的编制与验证
J Genet Couns. 2018 Sep;27(5):1248-1257. doi: 10.1007/s10897-018-0249-1. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
5
Measuring the Effectiveness of a Genetic Counseling Supervision Training Conference.评估遗传咨询督导培训会议的成效
J Genet Couns. 2016 Aug;25(4):698-707. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9917-6. Epub 2015 Dec 5.
6
Genetic counselors' perceptions of student supervision across service delivery models.遗传咨询师对不同服务提供模式下学生督导工作的看法。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Dec;32(6):1314-1324. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1711. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
7
Experiences of United States genetic counseling supervisors regarding race/ethnicity in supervision: A qualitative investigation.美国遗传咨询师监管经验中有关种族/族裔的问题:一项定性研究。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Apr;31(2):510-522. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1521. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
8
Relieving the Bottleneck: An Investigation of Barriers to Expansion of Supervision Networks at Genetic Counseling Training Programs.突破瓶颈:遗传咨询培训项目监督网络扩展障碍调查
J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):241-251. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0142-3. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
9
Further validation of the Genetic Counseling Self-Efficacy Scale (GCSES): Its relationship with personality characteristics.进一步验证遗传咨询自我效能感量表(GCSES):与人格特征的关系。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Oct;29(5):748-758. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1202. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
10
Supervision in genetic counselor training in North America: A systematic review.北美遗传咨询师培训中的监督:一项系统综述。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Dec;28(6):1069-1086. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1168. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Small programs, big challenges: Reimagining the evaluation of clinical teaching in genetic counseling.小程序,大挑战:重新构想遗传咨询临床教学评估
J Genet Couns. 2025 Feb;34(1):e1924. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1924. Epub 2024 May 26.