Sever Zoe, Schlapbach Luregn J, Gilholm Patricia, Jessup Melanie, Phillips Natalie, George Shane, Gibbons Kristen, Harley Amanda
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 17;11:1140121. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1140121. eCollection 2023.
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends systematic screening for sepsis. Although many sepsis screening tools include parent or healthcare professional concern, there remains a lack of evidence to support this practice. We aimed to test the diagnostic accuracy of parent and healthcare professional concern in relation to illness severity, to diagnose sepsis in children.
This prospective multicenter study measured the level of concern for illness severity as perceived by the parent, treating nurse and doctor using a cross-sectional survey. The primary outcome was sepsis, defined as a pSOFA score >0. The unadjusted area under receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) and adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) were calculated.
Two specialised pediatric Emergency Departments in Queensland.
Children aged 30 days to 18 years old that were evaluated for sepsis.
None.
492 children were included in the study, of which 118 (23.9%) had sepsis. Parent concern was not associated with sepsis (AUC 0.53, 95% CI: 0.46-0.61, aOR: 1.18; 0.89-1.58) but was for PICU admission (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.17-3.19) and bacterial infection (aOR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.14-1.92). Healthcare professional concern was associated with sepsis in both unadjusted and adjusted models (nurses: AUC 0.57, 95% CI-0.50, 0.63, aOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.63; doctors: AUC 0.63, 95% CI: 0.55, 0.70, aOR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.14-2.19).
While our study does not support the broad use of parent or healthcare professional concern in isolation as a pediatric sepsis screening tool, measures of concern may be valuable as an adjunct in combination with other clinical data to support sepsis recognition.
ACTRN12620001340921.
拯救脓毒症运动建议对脓毒症进行系统筛查。尽管许多脓毒症筛查工具包括家长或医护人员的担忧,但仍缺乏证据支持这种做法。我们旨在测试家长和医护人员的担忧与疾病严重程度之间的诊断准确性,以诊断儿童脓毒症。
这项前瞻性多中心研究通过横断面调查测量了家长、主治护士和医生所感知的疾病严重程度的担忧程度。主要结局是脓毒症,定义为序贯器官衰竭评估(pSOFA)评分>0。计算未调整的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和调整后的优势比(aOR)。
昆士兰州的两个专门的儿科急诊科。
年龄在30天至18岁之间接受脓毒症评估的儿童。
无。
492名儿童纳入研究,其中118名(23.9%)患有脓毒症。家长的担忧与脓毒症无关(AUC 0.53,95%可信区间:0.46-0.61,aOR:1.18;0.89-1.58),但与入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)(OR:1.88,95%可信区间:1.17-3.19)和细菌感染(aOR:1.47,95%可信区间:1.14-1.92)有关。在未调整和调整模型中,医护人员的担忧都与脓毒症有关(护士:AUC 0.57,95%可信区间-0.50,0.63,aOR:1.29,95%可信区间:1.02-1.63;医生:AUC 0.63,95%可信区间:0.55,0.70,aOR:1.61,95%可信区间:1.14-2.19)。
虽然我们的研究不支持单独广泛使用家长或医护人员的担忧作为儿科脓毒症筛查工具,但担忧程度的衡量指标作为与其他临床数据相结合的辅助手段,可能对支持脓毒症识别有价值。
ACTRN12620001340921。