• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康、可持续和安全的食物系统:使用德尔菲调查研究澳大利亚政策参与者的认知和作用。

A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey.

机构信息

The University of Sydney, School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Boden Institute of Obesity, Nutrition, Exercise and Eating Disorders, The Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2019 Nov;22(16):2921-2930. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900185X. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1017/S136898001900185X
PMID:31340874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10260575/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is an urgent need to identify and develop cross-sectoral policies which promote and support a healthy, safe and sustainable food system. To help shape the political agenda, a critical first step is a shared definition of such a system among policy makers across relevant sectors. The aim of the present study was to determine how Australian policy actors define, and contribute to, a healthy, safe and sustainable food system.

DESIGN

A Delphi survey, consisting of two rounds, was conducted. Participants were asked how they define, and contribute to, a healthy, safe and sustainable food system (Round 1) and indicate their level of agreement with summary statements (Round 2).

SETTING

This was an online Delphi survey conducted in Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-nine and fourteen multisectoral and multilevel policy makers completed Round 1 and Round 2, respectively.

RESULTS

The definition included food processing regulation, environmentally friendly food production and access to nutritious food. All agreed that it was important for them to improve access and supply of healthy food and ensure healthy planning principles are applied.

CONCLUSIONS

There were cross-sectoral differences in definitions and contributions; however, critical consensus was achieved. The study contributes to the definition of key elements of a cross-sectoral food and nutrition policy to meet today's environmental, health, social and economic challenges; however, further research using a more representative multisectoral sample is warranted.

摘要

目的

迫切需要确定和制定跨部门政策,以促进和支持健康、安全和可持续的食品体系。为了帮助制定政治议程,至关重要的第一步是让相关部门的政策制定者对这样的体系达成共同定义。本研究旨在确定澳大利亚的政策参与者如何定义和促进健康、安全和可持续的食品体系。

设计

进行了两轮德尔菲调查。参与者被要求定义和促进健康、安全和可持续的食品体系(第一轮),并对总结性陈述表示赞同(第二轮)。

地点

澳大利亚的在线德尔菲调查。

参与者

29 名和 14 名多部门和多层次的政策制定者分别完成了第一轮和第二轮。

结果

定义包括食品加工监管、环保型食品生产和获得营养食品。所有人都认为,改善健康食品的供应和获取,并确保应用健康规划原则很重要。

结论

尽管在定义和贡献方面存在跨部门差异,但已达成关键共识。该研究有助于确定跨部门食品和营养政策的关键要素,以应对当今的环境、健康、社会和经济挑战;然而,需要使用更具代表性的多部门样本进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey.健康、可持续和安全的食物系统:使用德尔菲调查研究澳大利亚政策参与者的认知和作用。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Nov;22(16):2921-2930. doi: 10.1017/S136898001900185X. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
2
Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.优先考虑医疗服务提供模式,以建立更具可持续性的卫生系统:对澳大利亚卫生政策、临床实践和管理、学术和消费者利益相关者的德尔菲研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):425-432. doi: 10.1071/AH20160.
3
Development of the Local Food Systems Policy Index (Local Food-EPI+) tool and assessment process to benchmark the implementation of local government policies for creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems.地方食品系统政策指数(Local Food-EPI+)工具及评估流程的开发,用于衡量地方政府创建健康、公平且环境可持续食品系统政策的实施情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 2;27(1):e191. doi: 10.1017/S136898002400140X.
4
Sustainability and public health nutrition at school: assessing the integration of healthy and environmentally sustainable food initiatives in Vancouver schools.学校的可持续发展与公共卫生营养:评估温哥华学校中健康与环境可持续食品倡议的整合情况。
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2379-91. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015000531. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Relative contributions of recommended food environment policies to improve population nutrition: results from a Delphi study with international food policy experts.推荐的食品环境政策对改善人口营养的相对贡献:一项国际食品政策专家德尔菲研究的结果。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(11):2142-2148. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001076. Epub 2018 May 2.
8
Shaping Physical, Economic, and Policy Components of the Food Environment to Create Sustainable Healthy Diets.塑造食品环境的物质、经济和政策构成要素,以创建可持续的健康饮食。
Food Nutr Bull. 2020 Dec;41(2_suppl):74S-86S. doi: 10.1177/0379572120945904.
9
Promoting healthy and sustainable diets: barriers and enablers for successful policy activities in Australia.促进健康和可持续饮食:澳大利亚成功开展政策活动的障碍与推动因素
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 23;36(6):1633-1643. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab013.
10
'Sustainability does not quite get the attention it deserves': synergies and tensions in the sustainability frames of Australian food policy actors.“可持续性并未得到应有的关注”:澳大利亚食品政策行为体可持续性框架中的协同效应与矛盾冲突
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Sep;18(13):2323-32. doi: 10.1017/S136898001400295X. Epub 2014 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction of a Food Safety Evaluation System Based on the Factor Analysis of Mixed Data Method.基于混合数据法因子分析的食品安全评价体系构建
Foods. 2024 Aug 25;13(17):2680. doi: 10.3390/foods13172680.
2
Impact and process evaluation of a primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial.澳大利亚一项针对 10-12 岁儿童的小学食物教育和可持续性培训(FEAST)计划的影响和过程评估:实用群组非随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;24(1):657. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18079-8.
3
Food security definition, measures and advocacy priorities in high-income countries: a Delphi consensus study.高收入国家的食品安全定义、措施和宣传重点:德尔菲共识研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Oct;26(10):1986-1996. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000915. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Consumer-driven strategies towards a resilient and sustainable food system following the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.新冠疫情后澳大利亚建立有弹性和可持续的食物系统的消费者驱动策略。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;22(1):1539. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13987-z.
5
Developing a National Set of Health Equity Indicators Using a Consensus Building Process.利用共识建立过程制定国家健康公平指标集。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Aug 1;11(8):1522-1532. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.54. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
A scoping review of policies promoting and supporting sustainable food systems in the university setting.促进和支持大学校园可持续食物系统政策的范围综述。
Nutr J. 2020 Sep 10;19(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00617-w.
7
A healthy, sustainable and safe food system: examining the perceptions and role of the Australian policy actor using a Delphi survey - CORRIGENDUM.一个健康、可持续且安全的食品体系:运用德尔菲调查法审视澳大利亚政策行为体的认知与作用——勘误
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Dec;22(18):3485. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004038. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家 84 种行为、环境和职业以及代谢风险或风险组合的比较风险评估,1990-2016 年:全球疾病负担研究 2016 年的系统分析。
Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1345-1422. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32366-8.
2
Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium.未来蛋白质的供需:影响可持续平衡的策略与因素
Foods. 2017 Jul 20;6(7):53. doi: 10.3390/foods6070053.
3
Overconsumption of Energy and Excessive Discretionary Food Intake Inflates Dietary Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Australia.澳大利亚能源的过度消费和随意性食物摄入过多导致膳食温室气体排放量增加。
Nutrients. 2016 Oct 31;8(11):690. doi: 10.3390/nu8110690.
4
Opportunities and challenges in developing a whole-of-government national food and nutrition policy: lessons from Australia's National Food Plan.制定政府整体国家食品与营养政策面临的机遇与挑战:来自澳大利亚《国家食品计划》的经验教训
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Jan;19(1):3-14. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001834. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
5
A delphi method expert survey to derive standards for flood damage data collection.德尔菲法专家调查,为洪灾损失数据收集制定标准。
Risk Anal. 2010 Jan;30(1):107-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01325.x. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
6
Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agriculture.减少温室气体排放策略的公共卫生效益:食品和农业。
Lancet. 2009 Dec 12;374(9706):2016-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61753-0.
7
Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality.为全球卫生倡议确立政治优先事项:以孕产妇死亡率为例的框架与案例研究
Lancet. 2007 Oct 13;370(9595):1370-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61579-7.
8
Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.德尔菲调查技术的研究指南。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):1008-15.