Department of School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Department is Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Brain Inj. 2023 Jul 3;37(8):746-757. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2023.2208881. Epub 2023 May 5.
Despite research, national legislation, and clinical guidelines supporting transitional care, there is minimal benefit from existing transitional care interventions for racial/ethnic minorities with traumatic brain injury (TBI) discharged home from acute hospital care. Existing TBI transitional care interventions are not tailored to address the needs/preferences of patients from various racial/ethnic minority groups. The purpose of this study was to describe use of personalization to tailor a TBI transitional care intervention for various racial/ethnic groups.
Following preliminary intervention manual development, a qualitative descriptive study was conducted using eight focus groups with 40 English-and Spanish-speaking participants (12 patients, 12 caregivers, and 16 providers).
Three personalization-related themes emerged: 1) what is important to me, 2) finding someone to deliver the intervention who can adapt to my needs, and 3) respect over culture. Findings informed personalization strategies within our final manual.
We recommend researchers who wish to use personalization to tailor interventions to consider: 1) allowing stakeholders to dictate what is most important and 2) implementing an iterative intervention development process with input from diverse stakeholders. Findings have implications for informing the development of transitional care interventions to increase the likelihood that interventions are inclusive of needs and preferences of various races/ethnicities.
尽管有研究、国家立法和临床指南支持过渡性护理,但对于从急性医院护理出院回家的少数族裔创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 患者,现有的过渡性护理干预措施几乎没有带来益处。现有的 TBI 过渡性护理干预措施没有针对不同少数族裔群体的需求/偏好进行调整。本研究的目的是描述如何使用个性化来调整 TBI 过渡性护理干预措施,以适应不同的种族/族裔群体。
在初步干预手册开发之后,进行了一项使用 8 个焦点小组的定性描述性研究,共有 40 名讲英语和西班牙语的参与者(12 名患者、12 名护理人员和 16 名提供者)参加。
出现了 3 个与个性化相关的主题:1)对我来说什么是重要的,2)找到一个可以适应我需求的人来提供干预,3)尊重文化多样性。研究结果为我们最终手册中的个性化策略提供了信息。
我们建议希望使用个性化来调整干预措施的研究人员考虑:1)让利益相关者决定什么是最重要的,2)在不同利益相关者的投入下实施迭代干预开发过程。研究结果对于告知过渡性护理干预措施的发展具有重要意义,这将增加干预措施包容各种种族/族裔需求和偏好的可能性。