From the Interdisciplinary COVID-19-Center, University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine V-Pneumology, Allergology, Critical Care and ECMO/ECLS Center Saar, University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
ASAIO J. 2023 Aug 1;69(8):789-794. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001954. Epub 2023 May 5.
Interhospital transport of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients bears transport-associated risks. It is unknown how interhospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) transfer of COVID-19 patients by mobile ECMO units affects ARDS mortality. We compared the outcome of 94 COVID-19 patients cannulated in primary care hospitals and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams to that of 84 patients cannulated at five German ECMO centers. Patients were recruited from March 2020 to November 2021. Twenty-six transports were airborne, 68 were land-based. Age, sex, body-mass-index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, days invasively ventilated, and P/F-Ratio before ECMO initiation were similar in both groups. Counting only regional transports (≤250 km), mean transport distance was 139.5 km ± 17.7 km for helicopter (duration 52.5 ± 10.6 minutes) and 69.8 km ± 44.1 km for ambulance or mobile intensive care unit (duration 57.6 ± 29.4 minutes). Overall time of vvECMO support (20.4 ± 15.2 ECMO days for transported patients vs. 21.0 ± 20.5 for control, p = 0.83) and days invasively ventilated (27.9 ± 18.1 days vs. 32.6 ± 25.1 days, p = 0.16) were similar. Overall mortality did not differ between transported patients and controls (57/94 [61%] vs. 51/83 [61%], p = 0.43). COVID-19 patients cannulated and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams have no excess risk compared with patients receiving vvECMO at experienced ECMO centers. Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, limited comorbidities, and no contraindication for ECMO should be referred early to local ECMO centers.
医院间转运急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者存在转运相关风险。目前尚不清楚由移动 ECMO 团队转运 COVID-19 患者进行体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)对 ARDS 死亡率的影响。我们比较了 94 例在初级保健医院插管并由移动 ECMO 团队取回的 COVID-19 患者与 84 例在德国 5 个 ECMO 中心插管的患者的结局。患者招募时间为 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 11 月。26 次转运采用空运,68 次采用陆运。两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II、开始 ECMO 前的机械通气天数和 P/F 比值相似。仅计算区域转运(≤250km),直升机转运的平均转运距离为 139.5km±17.7km(持续时间 52.5±10.6 分钟),救护车或移动重症监护病房转运的平均转运距离为 69.8km±44.1km(持续时间 57.6±29.4 分钟)。vvECMO 支持的总时间(转运患者为 20.4±15.2 ECMO 天,对照组为 21.0±20.5 天,p=0.83)和机械通气的天数(转运患者为 27.9±18.1 天,对照组为 27.9±18.1 天,p=0.16)相似。两组患者的总死亡率无差异(57/94[61%]与 51/83[61%],p=0.43)。与在经验丰富的 ECMO 中心接受 vvECMO 的患者相比,由移动 ECMO 团队插管和取回的 COVID-19 患者没有额外的风险。应尽早将患有 COVID-19 相关 ARDS、合并症较少且无 ECMO 禁忌症的患者转至当地 ECMO 中心。