Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征行体外膜肺氧合的患者的静脉-静脉转流。

Transfer of Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients With COVID-19 Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

机构信息

From the Interdisciplinary COVID-19-Center, University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine V-Pneumology, Allergology, Critical Care and ECMO/ECLS Center Saar, University Medical Centre, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

ASAIO J. 2023 Aug 1;69(8):789-794. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001954. Epub 2023 May 5.

Abstract

Interhospital transport of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients bears transport-associated risks. It is unknown how interhospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) transfer of COVID-19 patients by mobile ECMO units affects ARDS mortality. We compared the outcome of 94 COVID-19 patients cannulated in primary care hospitals and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams to that of 84 patients cannulated at five German ECMO centers. Patients were recruited from March 2020 to November 2021. Twenty-six transports were airborne, 68 were land-based. Age, sex, body-mass-index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, days invasively ventilated, and P/F-Ratio before ECMO initiation were similar in both groups. Counting only regional transports (≤250 km), mean transport distance was 139.5 km ± 17.7 km for helicopter (duration 52.5 ± 10.6 minutes) and 69.8 km ± 44.1 km for ambulance or mobile intensive care unit (duration 57.6 ± 29.4 minutes). Overall time of vvECMO support (20.4 ± 15.2 ECMO days for transported patients vs. 21.0 ± 20.5 for control, p = 0.83) and days invasively ventilated (27.9 ± 18.1 days vs. 32.6 ± 25.1 days, p = 0.16) were similar. Overall mortality did not differ between transported patients and controls (57/94 [61%] vs. 51/83 [61%], p = 0.43). COVID-19 patients cannulated and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams have no excess risk compared with patients receiving vvECMO at experienced ECMO centers. Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, limited comorbidities, and no contraindication for ECMO should be referred early to local ECMO centers.

摘要

医院间转运急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者存在转运相关风险。目前尚不清楚由移动 ECMO 团队转运 COVID-19 患者进行体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)对 ARDS 死亡率的影响。我们比较了 94 例在初级保健医院插管并由移动 ECMO 团队取回的 COVID-19 患者与 84 例在德国 5 个 ECMO 中心插管的患者的结局。患者招募时间为 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 11 月。26 次转运采用空运,68 次采用陆运。两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II、开始 ECMO 前的机械通气天数和 P/F 比值相似。仅计算区域转运(≤250km),直升机转运的平均转运距离为 139.5km±17.7km(持续时间 52.5±10.6 分钟),救护车或移动重症监护病房转运的平均转运距离为 69.8km±44.1km(持续时间 57.6±29.4 分钟)。vvECMO 支持的总时间(转运患者为 20.4±15.2 ECMO 天,对照组为 21.0±20.5 天,p=0.83)和机械通气的天数(转运患者为 27.9±18.1 天,对照组为 27.9±18.1 天,p=0.16)相似。两组患者的总死亡率无差异(57/94[61%]与 51/83[61%],p=0.43)。与在经验丰富的 ECMO 中心接受 vvECMO 的患者相比,由移动 ECMO 团队插管和取回的 COVID-19 患者没有额外的风险。应尽早将患有 COVID-19 相关 ARDS、合并症较少且无 ECMO 禁忌症的患者转至当地 ECMO 中心。

相似文献

1
2
Interhospital transport of ARDS patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
J Artif Organs. 2019 Mar;22(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s10047-018-1065-y. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
6
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in COVID-19 Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis.
ASAIO J. 2022 Dec 1;68(12):e224-e229. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001829. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
7
Retrieval of severe acute respiratory failure patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Any impact on their outcomes?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;155(4):1621-1629.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.084. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
10
Pediatric COVID-19 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation transport during the pandemic.
Perfusion. 2024 Sep;39(6):1113-1119. doi: 10.1177/02676591231176243. Epub 2023 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes and risk factors of transported patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An ECMO center experience.
J Intensive Med. 2024 Jun 14;5(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.04.003. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: unmet needs and perspectives.
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Dec;44(12):2745-2756. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05732-z. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
[When mechanical ventilation fails-Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation].
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2023 Oct;64(10):922-931. doi: 10.1007/s00108-023-01586-y. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for coronavirus disease 2019 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Perfusion. 2023 Sep;38(6):1107-1122. doi: 10.1177/02676591221104302. Epub 2022 May 24.
5
ECMO use in Germany: An analysis of 29,929 ECMO runs.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260324. eCollection 2021.
6
Interhospital transport of COVID-19 patients on ECMO and comparison with historic controls.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2021 Dec;45(9):e65-e67. doi: 10.1016/j.medine.2020.09.007.
7
Mobile Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Covid-19 Does Not Pose Extra Risk to Transport Team.
ASAIO J. 2022 Feb 1;68(2):163-167. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001602.
8
Outcomes of Patients Denied Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greater Paris, France.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 15;204(8):994-997. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1312LE.
9
Mobile ECMO retrieval of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Artif Organs. 2021 Oct;45(10):1168-1172. doi: 10.1111/aor.14030. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Implementation and Outcomes of a Mobile Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Program in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(10):2869-2874. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2021.05.047. Epub 2021 May 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验