• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

输尿管结石:使用改良取石篮和荧光透视进行经皮取出术

Ureteral calculi: percutaneous removal using modified basket extractors and fluoroscopy.

作者信息

Hare W S

出版信息

Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):189-92. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3715031.

DOI:10.1148/radiology.160.1.3715031
PMID:3715031
Abstract

Two modified helical basket extractors are described that have increased the success rate of removing ureteral calculi using fluoroscopy from 63% to 92%. Initially a rather stiff and expandable basket with a 20-cm filiform tip is used with coaxial catheters and sheath (stage 1). If this procedure is unsuccessful, a basket with two long cable ends is passed from the nephrostomy out through the urethra (stage 2). When used with coaxial bladder catheters, this technique allows dilatation of the vesicoureteric junction and retrograde catheterization and injection of fluids or gas to dislodge the stone prior to extraction. In a series of 38 patients, stones were removed in all but three (a success rate of 92%). In five cases small stones (less than 5 mm) were not retrieved but subsequent studies were normal. Ureteral stones were found in the abdominal ureter in 28 cases, in the pelvic ureter in seven cases, and in multiple sites in three cases. Stones were larger than 1 cm in 27.7% of cases. Postextraction mucosal edema with reduced ureteral patency was common but usually cleared in 2-3 days. Occasional complications were related to the nephrostomy.

摘要

本文描述了两种改良的螺旋篮式取石器,它们使用荧光镜检查将输尿管结石取出成功率从63%提高到了92%。最初使用一种带有20厘米丝状尖端的相当硬且可扩张的篮子,并配合同轴导管和鞘管(第一阶段)。如果此操作不成功,则将带有两个长缆线末端的篮子从肾造口术处穿出并经尿道引出(第二阶段)。当与同轴膀胱导管一起使用时,该技术可扩张膀胱输尿管连接部,并在取出结石前进行逆行插管以及注入液体或气体以排出结石。在38例患者中,除3例(成功率为92%)外,其余患者的结石均被取出。5例患者的小结石(小于5毫米)未被取出,但随后的检查结果正常。28例患者的输尿管结石位于腹部输尿管,7例位于盆腔输尿管,3例位于多个部位。27.7%的病例结石大于1厘米。取出结石后黏膜水肿伴输尿管通畅性降低很常见,但通常在2 - 3天内消退。偶尔的并发症与肾造口术有关。

相似文献

1
Ureteral calculi: percutaneous removal using modified basket extractors and fluoroscopy.输尿管结石:使用改良取石篮和荧光透视进行经皮取出术
Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):189-92. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3715031.
2
Endourological treatment of ureteral calculi.输尿管结石的腔内治疗
J Urol. 1986 Feb;135(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45597-2.
3
Rapid, economical treatment of large impacted calculi in the proximal ureter with ballistic ureteral lithotripsy and occlusive, percutaneous balloon catheter: the high pressure irrigation technique.应用弹道输尿管碎石术和闭塞性经皮气囊导管对近端输尿管大的嵌顿结石进行快速、经济的治疗:高压冲洗技术
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):929-33; discussion 933-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.037. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
4
The CO2 flush: a new technique for percutaneous extraction of ureteral calculi.二氧化碳冲洗:经皮输尿管结石取出新技术。
Radiology. 1985 Mar;154(3):828. doi: 10.1148/radiology.154.3.3918334.
5
Percutaneous removal of renal and ureteral stones with and without concomitant transurethral manipulation by a urologist using antegrade and retrograde techniques without a radiologist's assistance.泌尿外科医生在无放射科医生协助的情况下,采用顺行和逆行技术,经皮去除肾和输尿管结石,同时可伴有或不伴有经尿道操作。
J Urol. 1988 Jun;139(6):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42854-0.
6
Optimal method of urgent decompression of the collecting system for obstruction and infection due to ureteral calculi.输尿管结石梗阻和感染时肾脏集合系统紧急减压的最佳方法。
J Urol. 1998 Oct;160(4):1260-4.
7
Forceps extraction of ureteral stones.
Urology. 1986 Feb;27(2):179-83. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90383-3.
8
[Limitations and complications of the use of the basket].[篮筐使用的局限性和并发症]
Arch Ital Urol Nefrol Androl. 1990 Dec;62(4):423-7.
9
Percutaneous nephrostomy for stone removal.经皮肾造瘘取石术。
Radiology. 1984 Jun;151(3):607-12. doi: 10.1148/radiology.151.3.6718717.
10
Percutaneous ureteral surgery and stenting.经皮输尿管手术及支架置入术。
Urology. 1984 May;23(5 Spec No):37-42. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(84)90240-1.