Saiki Yoshitomo, Kabata Tamon, Ojima Tomohiro, Kajino Yoshitomo, Kubo Naoyuki, Tsuchiya Hiroyuki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Fukui Health Science University, Fukui, Japan.
Bone Joint Res. 2023 May 8;12(5):313-320. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.125.BJR-2022-0257.R1.
We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of OpenPose, a posture estimation algorithm, for measurement of knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), in comparison to radiography and goniometry. In this prospective observational study, we analyzed 35 primary TKAs (24 patients) for knee osteoarthritis. We measured the knee angles in flexion and extension using OpenPose, radiography, and goniometry. We assessed the test-retest reliability of each method using intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1). We evaluated the ability to estimate other measurement values from the OpenPose value using linear regression analysis. We used intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) and Bland-Altman analyses to evaluate the agreement and error between radiography and the other measurements. OpenPose had excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1) = 1.000). The R of all regression models indicated large correlations (0.747 to 0.927). In the flexion position, the intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) of OpenPose indicated excellent agreement (0.953) with radiography. In the extension position, the intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) indicated good agreement of OpenPose and radiography (0.815) and moderate agreement of goniometry with radiography (0.593). OpenPose had no systematic error in the flexion position, and a 2.3° fixed error in the extension position, compared to radiography. OpenPose is a reliable and valid tool for measuring flexion and extension positions after TKA. It has better accuracy than goniometry, especially in the extension position. Accurate measurement values can be obtained with low error, high reproducibility, and no contact, independent of the examiner's skills.
我们旨在评估姿态估计算法OpenPose在全膝关节置换术(TKA)后测量膝关节活动范围的可靠性和有效性,并与X线摄影和角度测量法进行比较。在这项前瞻性观察研究中,我们分析了35例因膝关节骨关节炎接受初次TKA手术的患者(共24例患者)。我们使用OpenPose、X线摄影和角度测量法测量膝关节的屈伸角度。我们使用组内相关系数(1,1)评估每种方法的重测可靠性。我们使用线性回归分析评估从OpenPose值估计其他测量值的能力。我们使用组内相关系数(2,1)和Bland-Altman分析评估X线摄影与其他测量方法之间的一致性和误差。OpenPose具有出色的重测可靠性(组内相关系数(1,1)=1.000)。所有回归模型的R值均显示出高度相关性(0.747至0.927)。在屈曲位时,OpenPose的组内相关系数(2,1)表明与X线摄影具有出色的一致性(0.953)。在伸直位时,OpenPose与X线摄影的组内相关系数(2,1)表明一致性良好(0.815),角度测量法与X线摄影的一致性中等(0.593)。与X线摄影相比,OpenPose在屈曲位没有系统误差,在伸直位有2.3°的固定误差。OpenPose是一种用于测量TKA术后屈伸位的可靠且有效的工具。它比角度测量法具有更高的准确性,尤其是在伸直位。可以获得误差低、重现性高且无需接触、独立于检查者技能的准确测量值。