Suppr超能文献

DNA提取方案会影响眼表微生物群特征。

DNA extraction protocol impacts ocular surface microbiome profile.

作者信息

Delbeke Heleen, Casteels Ingele, Joossens Marie

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Neurosciences, Research Group Ophthalmology, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Microbiol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1128917. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1128917. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to provide a reference frame to allow the comparison and interpretation of currently published studies on 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid amplicon sequencing of ocular microbiome samples using different DNA extraction protocols. Alongside, the quantitative and qualitative yield and the reproducibility of different protocols has been assessed.

METHODS

Both eyes of 7 eligible volunteers were sampled. Five commercially available DNA extraction protocols were selected based on previous publications in the field of the ocular surface microbiome and 2 host DNA depletion protocols were added based on their reported effective host DNA depletion without significant reduction in bacterial DNA concentration. The V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was targeted using Illumina MiSeq sequencing. The DADA2 pipeline in R was used to perform the bio-informatic processing and taxonomical assignment was done using the SILVA v132 database. The Vegdist function was used to calculate Bray-Curtis distances and the Galaxy web application was used to identify potential metagenomic biomarkers linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe). The R package Decontam was applied to control for potential contaminants.

RESULTS

Samples analysed with PowerSoil, RNeasy and NucleoSpin had the highest DNA yield. The host DNA depletion kits showed a very low microbial DNA yield; and these samples were pooled per kit before sequencing. Despite pooling, 1 of both failed to construct a library.Looking at the beta-diversity, clear microbial compositional differences - dependent on the extraction protocol used - were observed and remained present after decontamination. Eighteen genera were consistently retrieved from the ocular surface of every volunteer by all non-pooled extraction kits and a comprehensive list of differentially abundant bacteria per extraction method was generated using LefSe analysis.

CONCLUSION

High-quality papers have been published in the field of the ocular surface microbiome but consensus on the importance of the extraction protocol used are lacking. Potential contaminants and discriminative genera per extraction protocol used, were introduced and a reference frame was built to facilitate both the interpretation of currently published papers and to ease future choice - making based on the research question at hand.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在提供一个参考框架,以便对目前已发表的、使用不同DNA提取方案对眼部微生物组样本进行16S核糖体核糖核酸扩增子测序的研究进行比较和解读。同时,评估了不同方案的定量和定性产量以及可重复性。

方法

对7名符合条件的志愿者的双眼进行采样。根据眼表微生物组领域以前的出版物选择了5种市售DNA提取方案,并根据其报道的有效去除宿主DNA且不显著降低细菌DNA浓度的情况添加了2种宿主DNA去除方案。使用Illumina MiSeq测序靶向16S rRNA基因的V3-V4区域。使用R中的DADA2管道进行生物信息处理,并使用SILVA v132数据库进行分类分配。使用Vegdist函数计算Bray-Curtis距离,并使用Galaxy网络应用程序识别潜在的宏基因组生物标志物——线性判别分析效应大小(LEfSe)。应用R包Decontam控制潜在污染物。

结果

使用PowerSoil、RNeasy和NucleoSpin分析的样本DNA产量最高。宿主DNA去除试剂盒的微生物DNA产量非常低;这些样本在测序前按试剂盒进行合并。尽管进行了合并,但其中一个试剂盒的样本未能构建文库。从β多样性来看,观察到明显的微生物组成差异——取决于所使用的提取方案——并且在去污后仍然存在。所有非合并提取试剂盒均从每位志愿者的眼表一致地检索到18个属,并使用LefSe分析生成了每种提取方法差异丰富细菌的综合列表。

结论

眼表微生物组领域已发表了高质量的论文,但对于所使用提取方案的重要性缺乏共识。介绍了每种使用的提取方案的潜在污染物和判别属,并构建了一个参考框架,以促进对当前已发表论文的解读,并便于根据手头的研究问题做出未来的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c1/10157640/8d5038056930/fmicb-14-1128917-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验