Suppr超能文献

用流式细胞术量化合成细菌群落组成:在模拟群落中的效果及共培养中的挑战

Quantifying synthetic bacterial community composition with flow cytometry: efficacy in mock communities and challenges in co-cultures.

作者信息

Mermans Fabian, Chatzigiannidou Ioanna, Teughels Wim, Boon Nico

机构信息

Ghent University, Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Gent, Belgium.

Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry (Periodontology), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

mSystems. 2025 Jan 21;10(1):e0100924. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01009-24. Epub 2024 Nov 29.

Abstract

Determination of bacterial community composition in synthetic communities is critical for understanding microbial systems. The community composition is typically determined through bacterial plating or through PCR-based methods, which can be labor-intensive, expensive, or prone to bias. Simultaneously, flow cytometry has been suggested as a cheap and fast alternative. However, since the technique captures the phenotypic state of bacterial cells, accurate determination of community composition could be affected when bacteria are co-cultured. We investigated the performance of flow cytometry for quantifying oral synthetic communities and compared it to the performance of strain specific qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Therefore, axenic cultures, mock communities and co-cultures of oral bacteria were prepared. Random forest classifiers trained on flow cytometry data of axenic cultures were used to determine the composition of the synthetic communities, as well as strain specific qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Flow cytometry was shown to have a lower average root mean squared error and outperformed the PCR-based methods in even mock communities (flow cytometry: 0.11 ± 0.04; qPCR: 0.26 ± 0.09; amplicon sequencing: 0.15 ± 0.01). When bacteria were co-cultured, neither flow cytometry, strain-specific qPCR, nor 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing resulted in similar community composition. Performance of flow cytometry was decreased compared with mock communities due to changing phenotypes. Finally, discrepancies between flow cytometry and strain-specific qPCR were found. These findings highlight the challenges ahead for quantifying community composition in co-cultures by flow cytometry.IMPORTANCEQuantification of bacterial composition in synthetic communities is crucial for understanding and steering microbial interactions. Traditional approaches like plating, strain-specific qPCR, and amplicon sequencing are often labor-intensive and expensive and limit high-throughput experiments. Recently, flow cytometry has been suggested as a swift and cheap alternative for quantifying communities and has been successfully demonstrated on simple bacterial mock communities. However, since flow cytometry measures the phenotypic state of cells, measurements can be affected by differing phenotypes. Especially, changing phenotypes resulting from co-culturing bacteria can have a profound effect on the applicability of the technique in this context. This research illustrates the feasibility and challenges of flow cytometry for the determination of community structure in synthetic mock communities and co-cultures.

摘要

确定合成群落中的细菌群落组成对于理解微生物系统至关重要。群落组成通常通过细菌平板培养或基于PCR的方法来确定,这些方法可能 labor-intensive、昂贵或容易产生偏差。同时,流式细胞术已被提议作为一种廉价且快速的替代方法。然而,由于该技术捕获细菌细胞的表型状态,当细菌进行共培养时,群落组成的准确测定可能会受到影响。我们研究了流式细胞术对口腔合成群落进行定量的性能,并将其与菌株特异性定量PCR和16S rRNA基因扩增子测序的性能进行了比较。因此,制备了口腔细菌的无菌培养物、模拟群落和共培养物。基于无菌培养物流式细胞术数据训练的随机森林分类器用于确定合成群落的组成,以及菌株特异性定量PCR和16S rRNA基因扩增子测序。结果表明,流式细胞术的平均均方根误差较低,在均匀的模拟群落中其性能优于基于PCR的方法(流式细胞术:0.11±0.04;定量PCR:0.26±0.09;扩增子测序:0.15±0.01)。当细菌进行共培养时,流式细胞术、菌株特异性定量PCR和16S rRNA基因扩增子测序均未得出相似的群落组成。由于表型变化,与模拟群落相比,流式细胞术的性能有所下降。最后,发现了流式细胞术与菌株特异性定量PCR之间的差异。这些发现凸显了通过流式细胞术对共培养物中的群落组成进行定量所面临的挑战。重要性合成群落中细菌组成的定量对于理解和调控微生物相互作用至关重要。传统方法如平板培养、菌株特异性定量PCR和扩增子测序通常 labor-intensive且昂贵,限制了高通量实验。最近,流式细胞术已被提议作为一种快速且廉价的群落定量替代方法,并已在简单的细菌模拟群落中得到成功验证。然而,由于流式细胞术测量细胞的表型状态,测量结果可能会受到不同表型的影响。特别是,细菌共培养导致的表型变化可能会对该技术在这种情况下的适用性产生深远影响。本研究阐明了流式细胞术用于确定合成模拟群落和共培养物中群落结构的可行性和挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0e2/11748490/840b5e80e22e/msystems.01009-24.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验