Evolutionary and Translational Venomics Laboratory, Instituto de Biomedicina de Valencia, CSIC, Valencia, Spain.
Unidad de Proteómica, Instituto Clodomiro Picado, Facultad de Microbiología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Mass Spectrom Rev. 2024 Sep-Oct;43(5):977-997. doi: 10.1002/mas.21850. Epub 2023 May 8.
The advent of soft ionization mass spectrometry-based proteomics in the 1990s led to the development of a new dimension in biology that conceptually allows for the integral analysis of whole proteomes. This transition from a reductionist to a global-integrative approach is conditioned to the capability of proteomic platforms to generate and analyze complete qualitative and quantitative proteomics data. Paradoxically, the underlying analytical technique, molecular mass spectrometry, is inherently nonquantitative. The turn of the century witnessed the development of analytical strategies to endow proteomics with the ability to quantify proteomes of model organisms in the sense of "an organism for which comprehensive molecular (genomic and/or transcriptomic) resources are available." This essay presents an overview of the strategies and the lights and shadows of the most popular quantification methods highlighting the common misuse of label-free approaches developed for model species' when applied to quantify the individual components of proteomes of nonmodel species (In this essay we use the term "non-model" organisms for species lacking comprehensive molecular (genomic and/or transcriptomic) resources, a circumstance that, as we detail in this review-essay, conditions the quantification of their proteomes.). We also point out the opportunity of combining elemental and molecular mass spectrometry systems into a hybrid instrumental configuration for the parallel identification and absolute quantification of venom proteomes. The successful application of this novel mass spectrometry configuration in snake venomics represents a proof-of-concept for a broader and more routine application of hybrid elemental/molecular mass spectrometry setups in other areas of the proteomics field, such as phosphoproteomics, metallomics, and in general in any biological process where a heteroatom (i.e., any atom other than C, H, O, N) forms integral part of its mechanism.
20 世纪 90 年代,基于软电离质谱的蛋白质组学的出现,为生物学带来了一个全新的维度,从概念上讲,它可以实现整个蛋白质组的综合分析。这种从还原论到整体综合方法的转变取决于蛋白质组学平台生成和分析完整定性和定量蛋白质组学数据的能力。具有讽刺意味的是,作为基础的分析技术,分子质谱本身是定量的。本世纪初,人们开发了分析策略,赋予蛋白质组学定量模式生物蛋白质组的能力,从“拥有全面分子(基因组和/或转录组)资源的生物体”的意义上来说。本文概述了这些策略,并重点介绍了最流行的定量方法的优缺点,突出强调了为模式物种开发的无标记方法在应用于定量非模式物种蛋白质组的各个成分时的常见误用(在本文中,我们将缺乏全面分子(基因组和/或转录组)资源的物种称为“非模式”生物,正如我们在这篇综述文章中详细阐述的那样,这种情况会影响它们的蛋白质组的定量。)。我们还指出了将元素和分子质谱系统结合到一个混合仪器配置中,用于毒液蛋白质组的平行鉴定和绝对定量的机会。这种新型质谱配置在蛇毒组学中的成功应用为在蛋白质组学领域的其他领域(如磷酸蛋白质组学、金属组学,以及一般在任何包含杂原子(即除 C、H、O、N 之外的任何原子)的生物过程中)更广泛和更常规地应用混合元素/分子质谱设置提供了一个概念验证。