Bluett M K, Healy D A, Kalemeris G C, O'Leary J P
South Med J. 1986 Jun;79(6):712-6. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198606000-00016.
Automatic stapling instruments have been used in gastrointestinal operations with increasing frequency. As a result, newer staplers have been developed which use more staples and compress the tissue to a greater degree. Our study was designed to compare one of the newer devices (GIA Premium) with a conventional device (ILA) in regard to tensile strength, bursting pressure, and histology. Functional end-to-end jejunal anastomoses were created in dogs and studied acutely and chronically. Acutely, the pressure needed to produce a staple line leak was greater with the GIA Premium; however, after healing no difference was noted. Total work required to disrupt a staple line was greater with the GIA Premium and remained so after healing. Fibroconnective tissue density was greater after healing in anastomoses created with the GIA Premium stapler. The data suggest a theoretical advantage in using the GIA Premium stapler, though both staplers produce an anastomosis adequate to resist the usual physiologic stress that may be encountered in man.
自动吻合器械在胃肠手术中的使用频率越来越高。因此,已开发出使用更多吻合钉且能更大程度压缩组织的新型吻合器。我们的研究旨在比较一种新型器械(GIA高级型)和一种传统器械(ILA)在拉伸强度、爆破压力和组织学方面的差异。在犬身上创建功能性端端空肠吻合,并进行急性和慢性研究。急性情况下,GIA高级型产生吻合钉线渗漏所需的压力更大;然而,愈合后未发现差异。破坏吻合钉线所需的总功,GIA高级型更大,且愈合后依然如此。使用GIA高级型吻合器创建的吻合口愈合后,纤维结缔组织密度更大。数据表明使用GIA高级型吻合器存在理论优势,不过两种吻合器都能产生足以抵抗人体可能遇到的常见生理应力的吻合口。