Suppr超能文献

临床和动态血压与死亡率的关系:59124 例患者的观察性队列研究。

Relationship between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure and mortality: an observational cohort study in 59 124 patients.

机构信息

Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Mutua Terrassa, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Lancet. 2023 Jun 17;401(10393):2041-2050. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00733-X. Epub 2023 May 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ambulatory blood pressure provides a more comprehensive assessment than clinic blood pressure, and has been reported to better predict health outcomes than clinic or home pressure. We aimed to examine associations of clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large cohort of primary care patients referred for assessment of hypertension.

METHODS

We did an observational cohort study using clinic and ambulatory blood pressure data obtained from March 1, 2004, to Dec 31, 2014, from the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry. This registry included patients from 223 primary care centres from the Spanish National Health System in all 17 regions of Spain. Mortality data (date and cause) were ascertained by a computerised search of the vital registry of the Spanish National Institute of Statistics. Complete data were available for age, sex, all blood pressure measures, and BMI. For each study participant, follow-up was from the date of their recruitment to the date of death or Dec 31, 2019, whichever occurred first. Cox models were used to estimate associations between usual clinic or ambulatory blood pressure and mortality, adjusted for confounders and additionally for alternative measures of blood pressure. For each measure of blood pressure, we created five groups (ie, fifths) defined by quintiles of that measure among those who subsequently died.

FINDINGS

During a median follow-up of 9·7 years, 7174 (12·1%) of 59 124 patients died, including 2361 (4·0%) from cardiovascular causes. J-shaped associations were observed for several blood pressure measures. Among the top four baseline-defined fifths, 24-h systolic blood pressure was more strongly associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1·41 per 1 - SD increment [95% CI 1·36-1·47]) than clinic systolic blood pressure (1·18 [1·13-1·23]). After adjustment for clinic blood pressure, 24-h blood pressure remained strongly associated with all-cause deaths (HR 1·43 [95% CI 1·37-1·49]), but the association between clinic blood pressure and all-cause death was attenuated when adjusted for 24-h blood pressure (1·04 [1·00-1·09]). Compared with the informativeness of clinic systolic blood pressure (100%), night-time systolic blood pressure was most informative about risk of all-cause death (591%) and cardiovascular death (604%). Relative to blood pressure within the normal range, elevated all-cause mortality risks were observed for masked hypertension (HR 1·24 [95% CI 1·12-1·37]) and sustained hypertension (1·24 [1·15-1·32]), but not white-coat hypertension, and elevated cardiovascular mortality risks were observed for masked hypertension (1·37 [1·15-1·63]) and sustained hypertension (1·38 [1·22-1·55]), but not white-coat hypertension.

INTERPRETATION

Ambulatory blood pressure, particularly night-time blood pressure, was more informative about the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular death than clinic blood pressure.

FUNDING

Spanish Society of Hypertension, Lacer Laboratories, UK Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centres (Oxford and University College London Hospitals), and British Heart Foundation Centre for Research Excellence.

摘要

背景

动态血压比诊所血压提供了更全面的评估,并且已经被证明比诊所或家庭血压更好地预测健康结果。我们旨在检查在西班牙高血压评估中被推荐的大量初级保健患者中,诊所和 24 小时动态血压与全因和心血管死亡率的关联。

方法

我们使用西班牙动态血压登记处 2004 年 3 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日获得的诊所和动态血压数据进行了一项观察性队列研究。该登记处包括来自西班牙国家卫生系统的 223 个初级保健中心的来自西班牙 17 个地区的患者。死亡率数据(日期和原因)通过计算机搜索西班牙国家统计局的生命登记册确定。对于每个研究参与者,随访从招募日期到死亡日期或 2019 年 12 月 31 日(以先发生者为准)。Cox 模型用于估计常用诊所或动态血压与死亡率之间的关联,调整了混杂因素,并进一步调整了替代血压测量值。对于每个血压测量值,我们根据随后死亡的参与者中该测量值的五分位数创建了五个组(即五分之一)。

结果

在中位随访 9.7 年期间,59124 名患者中有 7174 名(12.1%)死亡,其中 2361 名(4.0%)死于心血管原因。观察到几种血压测量值呈 J 形关联。在前四个基线定义的五分之一中,24 小时收缩压与全因死亡的相关性更强(每 1-SD 增加的危险比 [HR] 为 1.41[95%CI 1.36-1.47]),而诊所收缩压为 1.18[1.13-1.23])。在校正诊所血压后,24 小时血压与全因死亡仍有强烈关联(HR 1.43[95%CI 1.37-1.49]),但在校正 24 小时血压后,诊所血压与全因死亡的关联减弱(HR 1.04[1.00-1.09])。与诊所收缩压的信息含量(100%)相比,夜间收缩压对全因死亡(591%)和心血管死亡(604%)的风险最具信息性。与血压正常范围相比,隐匿性高血压(HR 1.24[95%CI 1.12-1.37])和持续性高血压(HR 1.24[95%CI 1.15-1.32])观察到全因死亡率升高,但未观察到白大衣高血压;隐匿性高血压(HR 1.37[1.15-1.63])和持续性高血压(HR 1.38[1.22-1.55])观察到心血管死亡率升高,但未观察到白大衣高血压。

解释

动态血压,特别是夜间血压,比诊所血压更能提供全因死亡和心血管死亡风险的信息。

资金

西班牙高血压学会、Lacer 实验室、英国医学研究理事会、英国健康数据研究中心、国家卫生与保健研究所生物医学研究中心(牛津大学和伦敦大学学院医院)和英国心脏基金会卓越研究中心。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验