• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌手术后生活质量得以维持。

The quality of life is sustained after operation for carcinoma of the esophagus.

作者信息

Sugimachi K, Maekawa S, Koga Y, Ueo H, Inokuchi K

出版信息

Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jun;162(6):544-6.

PMID:3715688
Abstract

An interview was conducted to determine the quality of life, both objectively and subjectively, in 64 patients without a recurrence of the disease more than one year after esophageal resection and reconstruction with a gastric tube for carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. Despite the decrease in body weight, the patients appeared to be well adjusted and had a most optimistic attitude toward their illness. The laboratory data showed normal values, postoperatively. As there was no evidence of a diminished quality of life in these patients, we consider that physicians should recommend surgical therapy for patients with carcinoma of the esophagus.

摘要

对64例因胸段食管癌行食管切除并用胃管重建且术后疾病无复发超过一年的患者进行了访谈,以客观和主观地确定其生活质量。尽管体重有所下降,但患者似乎适应良好,对自己的病情持非常乐观的态度。术后实验室数据显示各项值均正常。由于这些患者没有生活质量下降的迹象,我们认为医生应该为食管癌患者推荐手术治疗。

相似文献

1
The quality of life is sustained after operation for carcinoma of the esophagus.食管癌手术后生活质量得以维持。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986 Jun;162(6):544-6.
2
Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement.因食管癌置换术行结肠间置术后的生活质量
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Oct 1;88(1):32-38. doi: 10.1002/jso.20132.
3
[Evaluation on the quality of life among 130 esophageal carcinoma cases--ten years after surgical treatment].[130例食管癌患者手术治疗十年后生活质量评估]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1997 Oct;18(5):296-9.
4
Health-related quality of life in esophageal cancer: effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical intervention.食管癌患者与健康相关的生活质量:新辅助放化疗后手术干预的影响
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jan;137(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.049.
5
Quality of palliation and possible benefit of extra-anatomic reconstruction in recurrent dysphagia after resection of carcinoma of the esophagus.食管癌切除术后复发性吞咽困难的姑息治疗质量及解剖外重建的潜在益处
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Dec;179(6):705-13.
6
The effectiveness of palliative resection for advanced esophageal carcinoma: analysis of 24 consecutive cases.晚期食管癌姑息性切除术的疗效:24例连续病例分析
Surg Today. 2002;32(9):784-8. doi: 10.1007/s005950200150.
7
[Quality of life after thoracic surgery].
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1989:59-71.
8
[Cervical anastomotic stenosis after gastric tube reconstruction in esophageal carcinoma. Evaluation of a patient sample 1989-1995].[食管癌胃管重建术后的颈段吻合口狭窄。1989 - 1995年患者样本评估]
Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1997;382(3):145-8.
9
Prospective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer: preliminary results.食管癌手术切除术后生活质量的前瞻性分析:初步结果
J Surg Oncol. 2002 Dec;81(4):185-94. doi: 10.1002/jso.10175.
10
Long-term results of operation for 420 patients with early squamous cell esophageal carcinoma discovered by screening.420例经筛查发现的早期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的手术长期结果
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 May;77(5):1740-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.10.098.

引用本文的文献

1
Operative procedures of reconstruction after resection of esophageal cancer and the postoperative quality of life.
World J Surg. 1993 Nov-Dec;17(6):773-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01659093.
2
Quality of life with carcinoma of the esophagus.
World J Surg. 1994 May-Jun;18(3):399-405. doi: 10.1007/BF00316820.
3
Resection margin for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.食管鳞状细胞癌的手术切缘
Ann Surg. 1995 Aug;222(2):193-202. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199508000-00012.
4
Prospective randomised trial of laser therapy only and laser therapy followed by endoscopic intubation for the palliation of malignant dysphagia.单纯激光治疗与激光治疗后内镜插管治疗恶性吞咽困难的前瞻性随机试验。
Gut. 1990 Mar;31(3):252-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.31.3.252.