Marmor J
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;36(4):486-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780040128014.
The increasing prolongation of the didactic analysis and supervisory hours that has occurred in most psychoanalytic institutes over the past several decades has not only failed to guarantee a better trained and more scientific group of psychoanalysts, but, because of the unhealthy and authoritarian hegemony of training analysts over their candidates, may be having a contrary effect of fostering rigidity and dogmatism. If psychoanalysis is to remain vital, it must be open to growth and change like any other branch of science and its practitioners must be flexible and open to new vistas of knowledge from whatever source. A suggestion is offered that would enable psychoanalytic candidates, in most instances, to complete their training within a four-year period.
在过去几十年里，大多数精神分析机构的教学分析和督导时长不断延长，这不仅未能保证培养出一批训练更有素、更具科学性的精神分析师，而且由于训练分析师对其候选人的不健康且专制的霸权，可能会产生相反的效果，助长僵化和教条主义。如果精神分析要保持活力，就必须像其他科学分支一样开放地发展和变革，其从业者必须灵活，对来自任何来源的新知识视野持开放态度。本文提出一项建议，在大多数情况下，该建议能使精神分析候选人在四年内完成培训。
