Centre for Human Psychopharmacology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Institute for Breathing and Sleep (IBAS), Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2312522. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12522.
The use of cannabis as a medicine is becoming increasingly prevalent. Given the diverse range of conditions being treated with medical cannabis, as well as the vast array of products and dose forms available, clinical evidence incorporating patient-reported outcomes may help determine safety and efficacy.
To assess whether patients using medical cannabis report improvements in health-related quality of life over time.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective case series study was conducted at a network of specialist medical clinics (Emerald Clinics) located across Australia. Participants were patients who received treatment for any indication at any point between December 2018 and May 2022. Patients were followed up every mean (SD) 44.6 (30.1) days. Data for up to 15 follow-ups were reported. Statistical analysis was conducted from August to September 2022.
Medical cannabis. Product types and cannabinoid content varied over time in accordance with the treating physician's clinical judgement.
The main outcome measure was health-related quality of life as assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire.
In this case series of 3148 patients, 1688 (53.6%) were female; 820 (30.2%) were employed; and the mean (SD) age was 55.9 (18.7) years at baseline before treatment. Chronic noncancer pain was the most common indication for treatment (68.6% [2160 of 3148]), followed by cancer pain (6.0% [190 of 3148]), insomnia (4.8% [152 of 3148]), and anxiety (4.2% [132 of 3148]). After commencing treatment with medical cannabis, patients reported significant improvements relative to baseline on all 8 domains of the SF-36, and these improvements were mostly sustained over time. After controlling for potential confounders in a regression model, treatment with medical cannabis was associated with an improvement of 6.60 (95% CI, 4.57-8.63) points to 18.31 (95% CI, 15.86-20.77) points in SF-36 scores, depending on the domain (all P < .001). Effect sizes (Cohen d) ranged from 0.21 to 0.72. A total of 2919 adverse events were reported, including 2 that were considered serious.
In this case series study, patients using medical cannabis reported improvements in health-related quality of life, which were mostly sustained over time. Adverse events were rarely serious but common, highlighting the need for caution with prescribing medical cannabis.
大麻作为一种药物的使用越来越普遍。鉴于医用大麻治疗的病症种类繁多,以及可用的产品和剂量形式多种多样,纳入患者报告结果的临床证据可能有助于确定安全性和疗效。
评估使用医用大麻的患者是否随着时间的推移报告健康相关生活质量的改善。
设计、地点和参与者:本回顾性病例系列研究在澳大利亚各地的一家专门医疗诊所网络(Emerald Clinics)进行。参与者是在 2018 年 12 月至 2022 年 5 月期间任何时候因任何适应症接受治疗的患者。患者平均(SD)随访 44.6(30.1)天。报告了多达 15 次随访的数据。统计分析于 2022 年 8 月至 9 月进行。
医用大麻。根据治疗医生的临床判断,产品类型和大麻素含量随时间而变化。
主要结局指标是使用 36 项简短健康调查问卷(SF-36)评估的健康相关生活质量。
在这项由 3148 例患者组成的病例系列研究中,1688 例(53.6%)为女性;820 例(30.2%)有工作;基线治疗前的平均(SD)年龄为 55.9(18.7)岁。慢性非癌性疼痛是最常见的治疗适应症(68.6%[3148 例中的 2160 例]),其次是癌症疼痛(6.0%[3148 例中的 190 例])、失眠(4.8%[3148 例中的 152 例])和焦虑(4.2%[3148 例中的 132 例])。在开始使用医用大麻治疗后,与基线相比,所有 8 个 SF-36 领域的患者报告均有显著改善,并且这些改善大多持续存在。在回归模型中控制潜在混杂因素后,医用大麻治疗与 SF-36 评分从基线的 6.60(95%CI,4.57-8.63)点提高到 18.31(95%CI,15.86-20.77)点相关,具体取决于域(均 P<0.001)。效应大小(Cohen d)范围为 0.21 至 0.72。共报告了 2919 起不良事件,其中 2 起被认为是严重的。
在这项病例系列研究中,使用医用大麻的患者报告健康相关生活质量有所改善,并且大多持续存在。不良事件很少是严重的,但很常见,这突出了谨慎开具医用大麻处方的必要性。