• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与健康相关的生活质量及药用大麻的使用:一项横断面调查研究。

Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life and Use of Medicinal Cannabis: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

作者信息

Rosenbæk Frederik, Wehberg Sonja, Pedersen Line Bjørnskov, Nielsen Jesper Bo, Søndergaard Jens

机构信息

Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.

DaCHE-Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense M, Denmark.

出版信息

Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2025 Mar;12(1):125-133. doi: 10.1007/s40801-024-00479-2. Epub 2025 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1007/s40801-024-00479-2
PMID:39794668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11829861/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies on medicinal cannabis (MC) have primarily investigated effects on diseases and symptoms, while there is only sparse knowledge on patients' health-related quality of life. Our aim was, firstly, to compare the health-related quality of life of patients (MC users and non-users) within four specified diagnostic indications (multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuropathy, and nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy) with that of patients with other diagnostic indications (MC users only) and the adult population (non-users only). Secondly, we estimate the associations between use of MC and health-related quality of life for patients in the four specified diagnostic indications.

METHODS

We collected data on quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), using EQ-5D-3L, and patients' self-reported use of MC in a Danish nationwide online survey distributed to 23,846 patients in October 2020. We compared QALY scores of all groups using a two-tailed t-test, listed QALY scores of MC users versus non-users, and investigated associations between QALY score and MC use using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses. Significance level was set to p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 9265 patients took part in the survey. All diagnostic indications had a statistically significant lower QALY score than the adult population (0.87). Paraplegia patients had the lowest QALY score, being 0.36 lower, followed by other diagnostic indication (- 0.34), multiple sclerosis (- 0.20), neuropathy (- 0.13), and nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy (- 0.06). MC users had a statistically significant lower QALY score than non-users (0.44 vs 0.74). Users redeeming 1-6 and ≥ 7 MC prescriptions (except for paraplegia patients) had a statistically significant lower QALY score than non-users, ranging between 0.11-0.24 and 0.26-0.32 lower than non-users, accordingly. Although, it should be noted that the number of users was small when stratifying by number of prescriptions.

CONCLUSION

Patients with either multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, neuropathy, or nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy had a significantly lower health-related quality of life than individuals from the adult population. Users of medicinal cannabis also had a significantly lower health-related quality of life compared with non-users, in all diagnostic indications.

摘要

背景

关于药用大麻(MC)的研究主要调查了其对疾病和症状的影响,而对于患者与健康相关的生活质量的了解却很少。我们的目标是,首先,比较在四种特定诊断指征(多发性硬化症、截瘫、神经病变以及化疗后恶心和呕吐)下患者(MC使用者和非使用者)与其他诊断指征患者(仅MC使用者)以及成年人群(仅非使用者)的健康相关生活质量。其次,我们估计在四种特定诊断指征下MC的使用与患者健康相关生活质量之间的关联。

方法

我们在2020年10月向丹麦全国范围内的23846名患者开展的在线调查中,使用EQ-5D-3L收集了质量调整生命年(QALY)数据以及患者自我报告的MC使用情况。我们使用双尾t检验比较了所有组的QALY评分,列出了MC使用者与非使用者的QALY评分,并使用未调整和调整后的线性回归分析研究了QALY评分与MC使用之间的关联。显著性水平设定为p值<0.05。

结果

共有9265名患者参与了调查。所有诊断指征的QALY评分在统计学上均显著低于成年人群(0.87)。截瘫患者的QALY评分最低,比成年人群低0.36,其次是其他诊断指征(-0.34)、多发性硬化症(-0.20)、神经病变(-0.13)以及化疗后恶心和呕吐(-0.06)。MC使用者的QALY评分在统计学上显著低于非使用者(0.44对0.74)。使用1 - 6张和≥7张MC处方的使用者(截瘫患者除外)的QALY评分在统计学上显著低于非使用者,分别比非使用者低0.11 - 0.24和0.26 - 0.32。不过,应当指出的是,按处方数量分层时使用者数量较少。

结论

患有多发性硬化症、截瘫、神经病变或化疗后恶心和呕吐的患者的健康相关生活质量显著低于成年人群。在所有诊断指征下,药用大麻使用者的健康相关生活质量也显著低于非使用者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5005/11829861/2932ebf1e1ab/40801_2024_479_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5005/11829861/5105031dc3ff/40801_2024_479_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5005/11829861/2932ebf1e1ab/40801_2024_479_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5005/11829861/5105031dc3ff/40801_2024_479_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5005/11829861/2932ebf1e1ab/40801_2024_479_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life and Use of Medicinal Cannabis: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.患者与健康相关的生活质量及药用大麻的使用:一项横断面调查研究。
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2025 Mar;12(1):125-133. doi: 10.1007/s40801-024-00479-2. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.利用替代偏好评分和试验内方法估计成本效益:使用 EQ-5D 5 级版本和恢复生活质量效用指数探索质量调整生命年的动态。
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):1018-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1358. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
3
Where's WALY? : A proof of concept study of the 'wellbeing adjusted life year' using secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data.WALY 在哪里?:一项使用横断面调查数据的二次分析对“福祉调整生命年”进行的概念验证研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 8;14(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0532-5.
4
Catalog of EQ-5D-3L Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores for 199 Chronic Conditions and Health Risks in Denmark.丹麦199种慢性病和健康风险的EQ-5D-3L健康相关生活质量评分目录。
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Apr 9;8(1):23814683231159023. doi: 10.1177/23814683231159023. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
5
Discriminating the effects of Cannabis sativa and Cannabis indica: a web survey of medical cannabis users.区分大麻和印度大麻的效果:对医用大麻使用者的网络调查
J Altern Complement Med. 2014 Oct;20(10):787-91. doi: 10.1089/acm.2013.0190. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
6
Associations between work-related stressors and QALY in a general working population in Japan: a cross-sectional study.在日本一般工作人群中,工作相关压力源与 QALY 之间的关联:一项横断面研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1375-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01710-1. Epub 2021 May 30.
7
Utilization of medicinal cannabis for pain by individuals with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者使用药用大麻治疗疼痛。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019 Jul 10;5:66. doi: 10.1038/s41394-019-0208-6. eCollection 2019.
8
Quality of life of inflammatory bowel diseases patients in france with EQ-5D-5 L: the QALY-MICI study.法国炎症性肠病患者使用EQ-5D-5L的生活质量:QALY-MICI研究
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):405-416. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03821-x. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
9
Medicinal Cannabis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Survey of Perspectives, Experiences, and Current Use in Australian Patients.用于炎症性肠病的药用大麻:澳大利亚患者的观点、经历及当前使用情况调查
Crohns Colitis 360. 2020 Apr 16;2(2):otaa015. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otaa015. eCollection 2020 Apr.
10
Reasons for Use and Perceived Effects of Medical Cannabis: A Cross-Sectional Statewide Survey.医用大麻的使用原因及感知效果:一项全州范围的横断面调查
Med Cannabis Cannabinoids. 2024 Jul 30;7(1):138-148. doi: 10.1159/000540593. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Health-related quality of life in patients accessing medicinal cannabis in Australia: The QUEST initiative results of a 3-month follow-up observational study.澳大利亚接受药用大麻治疗的患者的健康相关生活质量:QUEST 计划为期 3 个月的随访观察性研究结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 6;18(9):e0290549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290549. eCollection 2023.
2
The link between physician motivation and care.医生动机与医疗服务之间的联系。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Apr;25(3):525-537. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01605-7. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
3
Assessment of Medical Cannabis and Health-Related Quality of Life.
评估医用大麻与健康相关的生活质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2312522. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12522.
4
Catalog of EQ-5D-3L Health-Related Quality-of-Life Scores for 199 Chronic Conditions and Health Risks in Denmark.丹麦199种慢性病和健康风险的EQ-5D-3L健康相关生活质量评分目录。
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Apr 9;8(1):23814683231159023. doi: 10.1177/23814683231159023. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
5
Similarities and differences between two well-performing healthcare systems: a comparison between the Israeli and the Danish healthcare systems.两种表现出色的医疗体系之间的异同:以色列和丹麦医疗体系的比较。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2022 Feb 28;11(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13584-022-00524-x.
6
Medicinal cannabis use in palliative care.医用大麻在姑息治疗中的应用。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2021 Jun;50(6):363-368. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-02-21-5831.
7
QALY-time: experts' view on the use of the quality-adjusted LIFE year in COST-effectiveness analysis in palliative care.QALY 时间:专家对在姑息治疗中的成本效益分析中使用质量调整生命年的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 16;20(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05521-x.
8
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
9
Reflection on modern methods: selection bias-a review of recent developments.反思现代方法:选择偏差——近期发展综述。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Oct 1;47(5):1714-1722. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy138.
10
QALYs in 2018-Advantages and Concerns.2018年的质量调整生命年——优势与担忧
JAMA. 2018 Jun 26;319(24):2473-2474. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6072.