Suppr超能文献

动脉输入函数和药代动力学模型对在胰腺癌原位小鼠模型中检测基质导向药物诱导的血管效应的DCE-MRI生物标志物的影响。

Impact of Arterial Input Function and Pharmacokinetic Models on DCE-MRI Biomarkers for Detection of Vascular Effect Induced by Stroma-Directed Drug in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer.

作者信息

Cao Jianbo, Pickup Stephen, Rosen Mark, Zhou Rong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Current address: Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK.

出版信息

Mol Imaging Biol. 2023 Aug;25(4):638-647. doi: 10.1007/s11307-023-01824-7. Epub 2023 May 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We demonstrated earlier in mouse models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) that K derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI detected microvascular effect induced by PEGPH20, a hyaluronidase which removes stromal hyaluronan, leading to reduced interstitial fluid pressure in the tumor (Clinical Cancer Res (2019) 25: 2314-2322). How the choice of pharmacokinetic (PK) model and arterial input function (AIF) may impact DCE-derived markers for detecting such an effect is not known.

PROCEDURES

Retrospective analyses of the DCE-MRI of the orthotopic PDA model are performed to examine the impact of individual versus group AIF combined with Tofts model (TM), extended-Tofts model (ETM), or shutter-speed model (SSM) on the ability to detect the microvascular changes induced by PEGPH20 treatment.

RESULTS

Individual AIF exhibit a marked difference in peak gadolinium concentration. However, across all three PK models, k values show a significant correlation between individual versus group-AIF (p < 0.01). Regardless individual or group AIF, when k is obtained from fitting the DCE-MRI data using the SSM, k shows a significant increase after PEGPH20 treatment (p < 0.05 compared to the baseline); %change of k from baseline to post-treatment is also significantly different between PEGPH20 versus vehicle group (p < 0.05). In comparison, when k is derived from the TM, only the use of individual AIF leads to a significant increase of k after PEGPH20 treatment, whereas the %change of k is not different between PEGPH20 versus vehicle group. Group AIF but not individual AIF allows detection of a significant increase of V (derived from the ETM) in PEGPH20 versus vehicle group (p < 0.05). Increase of V is consistent with a large increase of mean capillary lumen area estimated from immunostaining.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that k derived from SSM and V from ETM, both using group AIF, are optimal for the detection of microvascular changes induced by stroma-directed drug PEGPH20. These analyses provide insights in the choice of PK model and AIF for optimal DCE protocol design in mouse pancreatic cancer models.

摘要

目的

我们先前在胰腺导管腺癌(PDA)小鼠模型中证明,动态对比增强(DCE)MRI得出的K值可检测到PEGPH20(一种可去除基质透明质酸的透明质酸酶)诱导的微血管效应,从而降低肿瘤间质液压力(《临床癌症研究》(2019年)25:2314 - 2322)。尚不清楚药代动力学(PK)模型和动脉输入函数(AIF)的选择如何影响用于检测这种效应的DCE衍生标志物。

程序

对原位PDA模型的DCE - MRI进行回顾性分析,以研究个体AIF与群体AIF结合Tofts模型(TM)、扩展Tofts模型(ETM)或快门速度模型(SSM)对检测PEGPH20治疗诱导的微血管变化能力的影响。

结果

个体AIF在钆浓度峰值上表现出显著差异。然而,在所有三种PK模型中,k值在个体AIF与群体AIF之间显示出显著相关性(p < 0.01)。无论使用个体AIF还是群体AIF,当使用SSM拟合DCE - MRI数据获得k值时,PEGPH20治疗后k值显著增加(与基线相比,p < 0.05);PEGPH20组与载体组之间k值从基线到治疗后的变化百分比也有显著差异(p < 0.05)。相比之下,当k值由TM得出时,仅使用个体AIF会导致PEGPH20治疗后k值显著增加,而PEGPH20组与载体组之间k值的变化百分比无差异。群体AIF而非个体AIF能够检测到PEGPH20组与载体组相比V值(由ETM得出)显著增加(p < 0.05)。V值的增加与免疫染色估计的平均毛细血管腔面积大幅增加一致。

结论

我们的结果表明,使用群体AIF时,由SSM得出的k值和由ETM得出的V值最适合检测基质导向药物PEGPH20诱导的微血管变化。这些分析为小鼠胰腺癌模型中最佳DCE方案设计的PK模型和AIF选择提供了见解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验