Ericson A, Källén B
Am J Ind Med. 1986;9(5):459-75. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700090507.
A case-control study on work with video screen equipment during pregnancy has been made for three cohorts of women, identified with the aid of occupational codes in the census, linked to the Medical Birth Registry and a registry containing information on women hospitalized for spontaneous abortion. Five hundred and twenty-two cases were selected (women with spontaneous abortions or women who had infants that died, had severe malformations, or had a birth-weight below 1,500 g) and 1,032 controls (women who had infants without any of these characteristics) taken from the same age stratum as the cases. All pregnancies had occurred in 1980-81. Questionnaires were mailed to the women asking for information on their work situation, including questions about work with video screen equipment. Fifty-eight women were excluded for various reasons. Response rate was 93%--lower (89%) among women with spontaneous abortions than among women who gave birth (95%). As stress and smoking were associated with video screen work, the effect of video screen work was analyzed after stratification for stress and smoking--no statistically significant effect of video screen work was seen but odds ratios were above 1. Crude odds ratios for video screen work were significantly elevated and showed a dose-dependent effect. This finding is discussed from the point of view of biases in the study: selective non-responding, recall bias, geographical variability, and lack of information on women who had induced abortions. Using questionnaire data for exposure rates in the populations studied, an estimate of the effect greater than or equal to 10 hr weekly work with video screens on spontaneous abortion rate was made. The point estimate was 1.04 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.9-1.2. Analysis of 44 infants with birth defects whose mothers had worked more than 10 hr/week with video screen equipment compared to 30 infants with birth defects whose mothers had not used such equipment in early pregnancy showed no signs of specificity in the type of birth defect.
针对三组女性开展了一项关于孕期使用视频显示设备工作情况的病例对照研究。这些女性借助人口普查中的职业编码得以确定,并与医疗出生登记处以及一个包含因自然流产住院女性信息的登记处相关联。研究选取了522例病例(自然流产的女性或其婴儿死亡、有严重畸形或出生体重低于1500克的女性)以及1032名对照(其婴儿无上述任何特征的女性),对照与病例来自同一年龄层。所有妊娠均发生在1980 - 1981年期间。研究人员向这些女性邮寄了问卷,询问她们的工作情况,包括与视频显示设备工作相关的问题。58名女性因各种原因被排除。回复率为93%,自然流产女性的回复率(89%)低于分娩女性(95%)。由于压力和吸烟与视频显示设备工作有关,因此在对压力和吸烟进行分层后分析了视频显示设备工作的影响——未观察到视频显示设备工作有统计学显著影响,但优势比高于1。视频显示设备工作的粗优势比显著升高且呈现剂量依赖性效应。从研究中的偏差角度对这一发现进行了讨论:选择性无应答、回忆偏差、地理变异性以及缺乏人工流产女性的信息。利用问卷数据得出所研究人群的暴露率,对每周使用视频屏幕工作不少于10小时对自然流产率的影响进行了估计。点估计值为1.04,95%置信区间为0.9 - 1.2。对44名母亲在孕期每周使用视频显示设备工作超过10小时的出生缺陷婴儿与30名母亲在孕早期未使用此类设备的出生缺陷婴儿进行分析,结果显示出生缺陷类型并无特异性迹象。