Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Center of Physiology, Cardiovascular Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Cells. 2023 Apr 30;12(9):1289. doi: 10.3390/cells12091289.
The classic two-stage masquelet technique is an effective procedure for the treatment of large bone defects. Our group recently showed that one surgery could be saved by using a decellularized dermis membrane (DCD, Epiflex, DIZG). In addition, studies with bone substitute materials for defect filling show that it also appears possible to dispense with the removal of syngeneic cancellous bone (SCB), which is fraught with complications. The focus of this work was to clarify whether the SCB can be replaced by the granular demineralized bone matrix (g-DBM) or fibrous demineralized bone matrix (f-DBM) demineralized bone matrix and whether the colonization of the DCD and/or the DBM defect filling with bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMC) can lead to improved bone healing. In 100 Sprague Dawley rats, a critical femoral bone defect 5 mm in length was stabilized with a plate and then encased in DCD. Subsequently, the defect was filled with SCB (control), g-DBM, or f-DBM, with or without BMC. After 8 weeks, the femurs were harvested and subjected to histological, radiological, and biomechanical analysis. The analyses showed the incipient bony bridging of the defect zone in both groups for g-DBM and f-DBM. Stability and bone formation were not affected compared to the control group. The addition of BMCs showed no further improvement in bone healing. In conclusion, DBM offers a new perspective on defect filling; however, the addition of BMC did not lead to better results.
经典的两阶段 Masquelet 技术是治疗大骨缺损的有效方法。我们的研究小组最近表明,使用脱细胞真皮膜(DCD,Epiflex,DIZG)可以节省一次手术。此外,使用骨替代材料进行缺损填充的研究表明,也可以省去同种异体松质骨(SCB)的去除,这是有并发症风险的。这项工作的重点是阐明 SCB 是否可以被颗粒脱矿骨基质(g-DBM)或纤维脱矿骨基质(f-DBM)代替,以及骨髓单核细胞(BMC)是否可以促进 DCD 和/或 DBM 缺陷填充的骨定植,从而改善骨愈合。在 100 只 Sprague Dawley 大鼠中,通过钢板稳定 5mm 长的股骨临界骨缺损,然后用 DCD 包裹。随后,用 SCB(对照组)、g-DBM 或 f-DBM 填充缺损,同时或不填充 BMC。8 周后,取出股骨进行组织学、影像学和生物力学分析。分析表明,g-DBM 和 f-DBM 两组的缺损区均有初始骨桥形成。与对照组相比,稳定性和骨形成没有受到影响。添加 BMC 并没有进一步改善骨愈合。总之,DBM 为缺陷填充提供了新的视角;然而,添加 BMC 并没有带来更好的结果。