Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yiwu Central Hospital, 699 Jiangdong Road, Yiwu City, 322000, Zhejiang Province, China.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200233, China.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Nov;280(11):4861-4868. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08004-x. Epub 2023 May 13.
The objective of this study was to compare graft outcome, operation time and surgical complications of the double and single perichondrium-cartilage underlay techniques for repairing subtotal tympanic membrane (TM) perforations.
Patients with unilateral subtotal perforations undergoing myringoplasty were prospectively randomized to undergo DPCN or SPCN. The operation time, graft success rate, audiometric outcomes, and complications were compared between these groups.
In total, 53 patients with unilateral subtotal perforations were included (DPCN group, 27; SPCN group, 26).All patients completed 6 months of follow-up. The mean operation time was 41.2 ± 1.8 min in the DPCN group and 37.2 ± 5.4 min in the SPCN group, the difference was not significant (p = 0.613).The graft success rates were 96.3% (26/27) in the DPCN group and 73.1% (19/26) in the SPCN group, the difference was significant (p = 0.048). During the period of follow-up, residual perforation was found at postoperative in one (3.7%) in the DPCN group, while cartilage graft slipped (graft lateralization) in 2 (7.7%) and residual perforation in 5 (19.2%) were found in the SPCN group, the difference of residual perforation was not significant among two group (p = 0.177).In addition, no significant between-group differences were observed pre- (p = 0.741) or post- (p = 0.687) operative ABG values or mean ABG gain (p = 0.659) (Table 2).The functional success rates (postoperative ABG ≤ 20 dB) were 85.2% (23/27) in the DPCN group and 73.1% (19/26) in the SPCN group (p = 0.454).
Although similar functional result and operation time can be obtained with double perichondrium-cartilage underlay technique compared to the single perichondrium-cartilage underlay technique for endoscopic closure of subtotal perforations, double unerlay technique offers better anatomical result with minimum complications.
本研究旨在比较双软骨膜-软骨下置片技术与单软骨膜-软骨下置片技术修复部分鼓膜穿孔的移植物效果、手术时间和手术并发症。
前瞻性随机选择单侧部分鼓膜穿孔行鼓室成形术的患者,分为双软骨膜-软骨下置片组(DPCN 组)和单软骨膜-软骨下置片组(SPCN 组)。比较两组患者的手术时间、移植物成功率、听力结果和并发症。
共纳入 53 例单侧部分鼓膜穿孔患者(DPCN 组 27 例,SPCN 组 26 例)。所有患者均完成 6 个月随访。DPCN 组手术时间为 41.2±1.8min,SPCN 组为 37.2±5.4min,差异无统计学意义(p=0.613)。DPCN 组移植物成功率为 96.3%(26/27),SPCN 组为 73.1%(19/26),差异有统计学意义(p=0.048)。在随访期间,DPCN 组术后发现 1 例(3.7%)残余穿孔,SPCN 组 2 例(7.7%)软骨移植物滑脱(移植物侧移)和 5 例(19.2%)残余穿孔,两组残余穿孔差异无统计学意义(p=0.177)。此外,两组术前(p=0.741)和术后(p=0.687)气骨导值或平均气骨导差增益(p=0.659)均无显著差异(表 2)。DPCN 组术后功能性成功率(气骨导值≤20dB)为 85.2%(23/27),SPCN 组为 73.1%(19/26)(p=0.454)。
尽管双软骨膜-软骨下置片技术与单软骨膜-软骨下置片技术在经内镜闭合部分穿孔方面均可获得相似的功能结果和手术时间,但双软骨膜下置片技术提供了更好的解剖学结果,并发症更少。