Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 1;41(19):3493-3498. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00150. Epub 2023 May 14.
JCO In a randomized phase II clinical trial, the Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group compared single- versus multifraction stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in 90 patients with 133 oligometastases to the lung. The study found no differences in safety, efficacy, systemic immunogenicity, or survival between arms, with single-fraction SABR picked as the winner on the basis of cost-effectiveness. In this article, we report the final updated survival outcome analysis. The protocol mandated no concurrent or post-therapy systemic therapy until progression. Modified disease-free survival (mDFS) was defined as any progression not addressable by local therapy, or death. At a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the 3- and 5-year estimates for overall survival (OS) were 70% (95% CI, 59 to 78) and 51% (95% CI, 39 to 61). There were no significant differences between the multi- and single-fraction arms for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1 [95% CI, 0.6 to 2.0]; = .81). The 3- and 5-year estimates for disease-free survival were 24% (95% CI, 16 to 33) and 20% (95% CI, 13 to 29), with no differences between arms (HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.6]; = .92). The 3- and 5-year estimates for mDFS were 39% (95% CI, 29 to 49) and 34% (95% CI, 24 to 44), with no differences between arms (HR, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.8]; = .90). In this patient population, where patients receive SABR in lieu of systemic therapy, one-in-three patients are alive without disease in the long term. There were no differences in outcomes by fractionation schedule.
在一项随机的 II 期临床试验中,跨塔斯曼辐射肿瘤学组(Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group)比较了单剂量与多剂量立体定向消融体放射治疗(SABR)在 90 例 133 个肺寡转移灶患者中的疗效。研究发现,两组之间在安全性、疗效、全身免疫原性或生存率方面均无差异,单剂量 SABR 在基于成本效益的基础上被选为赢家。在这篇文章中,我们报告了最终的更新生存结果分析。该方案规定,在进展之前不得同时或之后进行系统治疗。改良无疾病生存(mDFS)定义为任何无法通过局部治疗解决的进展或死亡。在中位随访 5.4 年后,总生存(OS)的 3 年和 5 年估计值分别为 70%(95%CI,59 至 78)和 51%(95%CI,39 至 61)。多剂量和单剂量组之间的 OS 无显著差异(风险比[HR],1.1[95%CI,0.6 至 2.0];=.81)。无疾病生存的 3 年和 5 年估计值分别为 24%(95%CI,16 至 33)和 20%(95%CI,13 至 29),两组之间无差异(HR,1.0[95%CI,0.6 至 1.6];=.92)。mDFS 的 3 年和 5 年估计值分别为 39%(95%CI,29 至 49)和 34%(95%CI,24 至 44),两组之间无差异(HR,1.0[95%CI,0.6 至 1.8];=.90)。在这群接受 SABR 替代全身治疗的患者中,每 3 名患者中有 1 名长期无病生存。两种分割方案的结果无差异。