Rajeev-Kumar Greeshma, Manjunath Rajashri, Hasan Yasmin
University of Chicago, Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Chicago, Illinois.
Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Mar 31;8(5):101230. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101230. eCollection 2023 Sep-Oct.
This study analyzes assessments within radiation oncology (RO) to determine characteristics of existing assessment methods and then report resident perceptions of these methods. We hypothesize familiarity with evaluation methods is predictive of the perceived utility of evaluations and behavioral changes.
This study was conducted in 2 phases. Phase 1 involved requesting resident evaluation forms from RO residency programs to assess the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 6 Core Competencies. Analysis of variance was used to determine any significant differences between institutions or categories of questions. In phase 2, RO residents were surveyed about familiarity with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestones and their perceptions about the current methods. Responses to questions were further analyzed using linear regression models.
In phase 1, forms were obtained from 13 institutions, and they were based on the 6 Core Competencies with an average of 19 questions (standard deviation, 11; range, 5-47) in total. Analysis of variance did not show significant variation in the number of questions between the categories ( = 0.78, = .6). A significant difference in the mean number of questions used for assessing each of the competencies was found between institutions ( = 6.6, < .01). In phase 2, a majority of surveyed residents reported being "not" or only "slightly familiar" with the competencies (59.6%) and the factors used to assess them (73.1%). Resident-reported familiarity with the evaluation methods was not found to be a significant predictor of likelihood of changing postevaluation (coefficient = 0.41, = .204), intimidation from receiving evaluations (coefficient = -0.06, = .792), stress of receiving evaluations (coefficient = -0.11, = .62), or usefulness of evaluations (coefficient = -0.02, = .83).
Familiarity with evaluation methods is not correlated with perceptions or behavioral changes necessitating further investigation of alternative predictor variables. Despite the low familiarity with evaluation tools, most residents reported that evaluations were useful and likely to elicit changes in their behaviors and practice, highlighting the value of current evaluation methods.
本研究分析放射肿瘤学(RO)中的评估,以确定现有评估方法的特征,然后报告住院医师对这些方法的看法。我们假设对评估方法的熟悉程度可预测评估的感知效用和行为变化。
本研究分两个阶段进行。第一阶段涉及向RO住院医师培训项目索取住院医师评估表,以评估研究生医学教育认证委员会的6项核心能力。方差分析用于确定不同机构或问题类别之间是否存在显著差异。在第二阶段,对RO住院医师进行了关于对研究生医学教育里程碑的熟悉程度及其对当前方法看法的调查。使用线性回归模型进一步分析对问题的回答。
在第一阶段,从13个机构获得了表格,这些表格基于6项核心能力,总共平均有19个问题(标准差为11;范围为5 - 47)。方差分析未显示不同类别问题数量存在显著差异(F = 0.78,P = 0.6)。不同机构之间用于评估每项能力的问题平均数量存在显著差异(F = 6.6,P < 0.01)。在第二阶段,大多数接受调查的住院医师表示对这些能力(59.6%)及其评估因素(73.1%)“不熟悉”或只是“略有熟悉”。未发现住院医师报告的对评估方法的熟悉程度是评估后改变可能性(系数 = 0.41,P = 0.