Isanovic Sejla, Constantinides Shilpa V, Frongillo Edward A, Bhandari Shiva, Samin Sharraf, Kenney Emma, Wertheim-Heck Sigrid, Nordhagen Stella, Holdsworth Michelle, Dominguez-Salas Paula, Ambikapathi Ramya, Laar Amos, Patil Crystal L, Kulkarni Bharati, Bukachi Salome A, Ngutu Mariah, Blake Christine E
Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Environmental Policy Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2022 Dec 22;7(1):100015. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2022.100015. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Consumption of unsafe foods increases morbidity and mortality and is currently an issue, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Policy actions to ensure food safety are dominated by mitigation of biological and chemical hazards through supply-side risk management, lessening the degree to which consumer perspectives of food safety are considered.
This study aimed to provide an in-depth understanding, from vendor and consumer perspectives, of how food-safety concerns of consumers translate into their subsequent food-choice behaviors in 6 diverse low- and middle-income countries.
Six Drivers of Food Choice projects (2016-2022) provided transcripts from 17 focus group discussions and 343 interviews conducted in Ghana, Guinea, India, Kenya, Tanzania, and Vietnam. Qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify emerging themes important to food safety.
The analysis suggests that consumers constructed meaning about food safety through personal lived experience and social influences. Community and family members contributed knowledge about food safety. Concerns about food safety were influenced by reputations of and relationships with food vendors. Consumers' mistrust of food vendors was amplified by purposeful adulteration or unsafe selling practices and new methods used to produce food. Moreover, consumers were reassured of food safety by positive relationships with vendors; meals cooked at home; implementation of policies and following regulations; vendor adherence to environmental sanitation and food-hygiene practices; cleanliness of vendors' appearance; and vendors' or producers' agency to use risk mitigation strategies in production, processing, and distribution of food.
Consumers integrated their meanings, knowledge, and concerns about food safety to achieve assurance about the safety of their foods when making food-choice decisions. The success of food-safety policies hinges on consideration of consumers' food-safety concerns in their design and implementation, alongside actions to reduce risk in food supply.
食用不安全食品会增加发病率和死亡率,目前这是一个问题,在低收入和中等收入国家尤为突出。确保食品安全的政策行动主要是通过供应方风险管理来减轻生物和化学危害,较少考虑消费者对食品安全的看法。
本研究旨在从供应商和消费者的角度,深入了解在6个不同的低收入和中等收入国家,消费者对食品安全的担忧如何转化为他们随后的食物选择行为。
六个食物选择驱动因素项目(2016 - 2022年)提供了在加纳、几内亚、印度、肯尼亚、坦桑尼亚和越南进行的17次焦点小组讨论和343次访谈的文字记录。采用定性主题分析来确定对食品安全重要的新出现主题。
分析表明,消费者通过个人生活经历和社会影响构建了关于食品安全的意义。社区和家庭成员提供了有关食品安全的知识。对食品安全的担忧受到食品供应商声誉和与供应商关系的影响。故意掺假或不安全的销售行为以及新的食品生产方法加剧了消费者对食品供应商的不信任。此外,与供应商的积极关系、在家做饭、政策的实施和法规的遵守、供应商对环境卫生和食品卫生做法的坚持、供应商外表的整洁以及供应商或生产商在食品生产、加工和分销中使用风险缓解策略的行为,让消费者对食品安全感到放心。
消费者在做出食物选择决策时,整合了他们对食品安全的意义、知识和担忧,以确保所食用食品的安全。食品安全政策的成功取决于在其设计和实施过程中考虑消费者对食品安全的担忧,以及采取行动降低食品供应中的风险。