Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛患者对介入治疗的反应研究(PRICS):加拿大安大略省社区疼痛诊所的横断面调查

Patients Response to Interventional Care for Chronic Pain Study (PRICS): A Cross-Sectional Survey of Community-Based Pain Clinics in Ontario, Canada.

作者信息

Jovey Roman D, Balon Jeffrey, Mabee Joanne, Yake Julie, Currer Candace, Vadgama Geeta, Jomy Jane, Hong Ker-Yung, Patel Mansi, Busse Jason W

机构信息

Department of Pain Management, NeuPath Health Inc, Mississauga, CAN.

Department of Pain Management, NeuPath Health Inc, Ottawa, CAN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Apr 11;15(4):e37440. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37440. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-image guided injection treatments ("nerve blocks") are commonly provided in community pain clinics in Ontario for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) but remain controversial.

AIM

We explored patients' perspectives of nerve blocks for CNCP.

METHODS

We administered a 33-item cross-sectional survey to patients living with CNCP pain attending four community-based pain clinics in Ontario, Canada. The survey captured demographic information and asked about patient experiences with nerve blocks.

RESULTS

Among 616 patients that were approached, 562 (91%) provided a completed survey. The mean age of respondents was 53 (SD 12), 71% were female, and the majority (57%) reported living with CNCP for more than a decade. Fifty-eight percent had been receiving nerve blocks for their pain for >3 years, 51% on a weekly frequency. Since receiving nerve blocks, patients self-reported a median improvement in pain intensity of 2.5 points (95% CI -2.5 to -3.0) on an 11-point numeric rating scale and 66% reported stopping or reducing prescription medications, including opioids. The majority who were not retired (62%) were receiving disability benefits and were unable to work in any capacity. When asked what impact cessation of nerve blocks would have, most employed patients (52%) reported they would be unable to work, and the majority indicated their ability to function across multiple domains would decrease.

CONCLUSION

Our respondents who received nerve blocks for CNCP attribute important pain relief and functional improvement to this intervention. Randomized trials and clinical practice guidelines are urgently needed to optimize the evidence-based use of nerve blocks for CNCP.

摘要

背景

在安大略省的社区疼痛诊所,非影像引导注射治疗(“神经阻滞”)常用于慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP),但仍存在争议。

目的

我们探讨了患者对用于CNCP的神经阻滞的看法。

方法

我们对加拿大安大略省四家社区疼痛诊所中患有CNCP疼痛的患者进行了一项包含33个项目的横断面调查。该调查收集了人口统计学信息,并询问了患者接受神经阻滞的经历。

结果

在616名被邀请参与调查的患者中,562名(91%)完成了调查。受访者的平均年龄为53岁(标准差12),71%为女性,大多数(57%)报告称患有CNCP超过十年。58%的患者因疼痛接受神经阻滞治疗超过3年,51%的患者每周接受一次治疗。自接受神经阻滞治疗以来,患者在11点数字评分量表上自我报告疼痛强度的中位数改善了2.5分(95%置信区间为-2.5至-3.0),66%的患者报告停止或减少了包括阿片类药物在内的处方药用量。大多数未退休的患者(62%)正在领取残疾福利,无法从事任何工作。当被问及停止神经阻滞会有什么影响时,大多数在职患者(52%)报告称他们将无法工作,大多数人表示他们在多个领域的功能能力将会下降。

结论

我们的受访者将用于CNCP的神经阻滞治疗带来的显著疼痛缓解和功能改善归因于这种干预措施。迫切需要进行随机试验和制定临床实践指南,以优化基于证据的用于CNCP的神经阻滞治疗方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验