• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线质疑被误解:被质疑患病的博主所经历的知识不公正。

Contesting misrecognition online: Experiences of epistemic in/justice by vloggers with contested illnesses.

机构信息

Department of Culture Studies, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jun;327:115951. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115951. Epub 2023 May 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115951
PMID:37182295
Abstract

Contested illnesses, such as fibromyalgia, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), and chronic Lyme disease (CLD), are surrounded by polemic debates regarding their etiology, symptomology, treatment, and even their existence. People who suffer from these contested illnesses arguably also suffer from "epistemic injustice." This concept, coined by the philosopher Miranda Fricker, captures how people's knowledge may be discredited because of identity prejudices. In our paper, this concept is used to understand how seven Dutch women with contested illnesses experience the emancipatory potential of their vlogging practices. Our findings show how these women understood their vlogging as a means to break with epistemic smothering, understood as the propensity to cater ones testimony to one's audience (Dotson, 2011), and as a means to attain and enhance epistemic justice. However, our findings also show how vlogging about contested illnesses did not seem to allow these women to fully break with their epistemic smothering practices, and that the ableist design and gendered norms of YouTube were experienced as obstacles to attaining epistemic justice. We conclude that, even though social media do seem to hold emancipatory potential for these women, the experiences of individual users are diverse and ambiguous.

摘要

争议性疾病,如纤维肌痛、肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征(ME/CFS)和慢性莱姆病(CLD),其病因、症状、治疗方法甚至是否存在都存在争议。可以说,患有这些争议性疾病的人也患有“知识不公”。哲学家米兰达·弗里克创造了这个概念,用来描述人们的知识可能因身份偏见而受到质疑。在我们的论文中,这个概念被用来理解七位患有争议性疾病的荷兰女性如何体验她们的视频博客实践的解放潜力。我们的研究结果表明,这些女性如何将视频博客理解为打破知识窒息的一种手段,知识窒息是指倾向于迎合受众的证词(多森,2011),以及获得和增强知识公正的一种手段。然而,我们的研究结果也表明,关于争议性疾病的视频博客似乎并没有让这些女性完全摆脱知识窒息的做法,而 YouTube 的残疾歧视设计和性别规范被认为是获得知识公正的障碍。我们的结论是,尽管社交媒体似乎对这些女性具有解放潜力,但个体用户的体验是多样和模糊的。

相似文献

1
Contesting misrecognition online: Experiences of epistemic in/justice by vloggers with contested illnesses.在线质疑被误解:被质疑患病的博主所经历的知识不公正。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jun;327:115951. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115951. Epub 2023 May 7.
2
Epistemic in/justice in patient participation. A discourse analysis of the Dutch ME/CFS Health Council advisory process.患者参与中的认识不公正。对荷兰肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征健康委员会咨询过程的话语分析。
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jul;43(6):1335-1354. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13301. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
3
Striking the balance with epistemic injustice in healthcare: the case of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.在医疗保健中实现知识正义的平衡:慢性疲劳综合征/肌痛性脑脊髓炎案例。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Sep;23(3):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09945-4.
4
Epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters: evidence from chronic fatigue syndrome.医疗保健遭遇中的认知不公正:慢性疲劳综合征的证据。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Aug;43(8):549-557. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103691. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
5
A critical and systematic literature review of epistemic justice applied to healthcare: recommendations for a patient partnership approach.对应用于医疗保健的认识正义的批判性和系统性文献回顾:建立患者伙伴关系方法的建议。
Med Health Care Philos. 2024 Sep;27(3):455-477. doi: 10.1007/s11019-024-10210-1. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
6
Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations "Militant"? : Patient Protest in a Medical Controversy.肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征患者组织“激进”吗?:医学争议中的患者抗议
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9866-5. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health.认知斗争:倡导在促进心理健康中的认知正义和权利中的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;219:36-44. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Investigating Trust, Expertise, and Epistemic Injustice in Chronic Pain.探究慢性疼痛中的信任、专业知识与认知不公正
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Mar;14(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9761-x. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
9
Mapping out epistemic justice in the clinical space: using narrative techniques to affirm patients as knowers.在临床空间中描绘认识论正义:使用叙事技巧肯定患者作为知识的主体。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2021 Oct 26;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13010-021-00110-0.
10
Honoring the Voice of the Client in Clinical Social Work Practice: Negotiating with Epistemic Injustice.尊重临床社会工作实践中服务对象的声音:应对认知不公正
Soc Work. 2019 Jan 1;64(1):29-40. doi: 10.1093/sw/swy050.

引用本文的文献

1
Menopause apps: Personal health tracking, empowerment and epistemic injustice.更年期应用程序:个人健康追踪、赋权与认知不公。
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 27;11:20552076251330782. doi: 10.1177/20552076251330782. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
'We Don't Have to Prove to People How We're Feeling': Understanding the Role of Peer Support Groups in Countering Epistemic Injustices in Long COVID at a US Centre.“我们不必向他人证明自己的感受”:在美国一个中心理解同伴支持小组在对抗长期新冠认知不公正方面的作用。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70266. doi: 10.1111/hex.70266.
3
Epistemic and institutional recognition work in changing conditions of social visibility: Anosmia's journey from the shadows to the spotlight.
在社会可见性变化的条件下,认知和制度认可的工作:从阴影到聚光灯下的嗅觉丧失之旅。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116359. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116359. Epub 2023 Nov 2.