From the Department of Emergency Medicine (Sanip, Isa, Abd Samat, Jaafar, Saiboon), Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health (Manaf), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, and from the Department of Emergency Medicine (Silvalila), Faculty of Medicine, Unversitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia.
Saudi Med J. 2023 May;44(5):463-470. doi: 10.15537/smj.2023.44.5.20220941.
To improve public awareness and the rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a novel and exciting approach called fit-CPR that incorporates mass CPR with high-intensity physical activity into the beat of locally favoured music was proposed. This study was conducted to measure the effectiveness of fit-CPR compared to the standard classroom method (CCM).
Between 30th August to 29th November 2018, 129 participants from Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, were randomized to learn CPR, either through fit-CPR or CCM protocol. All participants underwent pre, post, and 6-month retention tests. Each test had a 10-item questionnaire with CPR performance on a manikin that was assessed using a validated checklist.
Sixty-one (47.3%) participants completed the fit-CPR while 68 (52.7%) completed the CCM. There was a significant improvement in knowledge, performance, and quality of CPR from pre, post, and 6-month retention tests (<0.01) in both groups. On high-quality CPR, the fit-CPR and CCM groups obtained an increased score of 285.0% and 151%, respectively, =0.014 between pre and immediate post-test. Knowledge scores between fit-CPR and CCM groups showed an increase of 79.5% and 111.2%, respectively, =0.002. Fit-CPR was completed between 52.5-57.5 minutes, while CCM took 75 minutes.
The fit-CPR demonstrated a comparable outcome to standard CPR when teaching to the mass public with less time spent.
为了提高公众意识和旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)的实施率,提出了一种新的、令人兴奋的方法,即 fit-CPR,它将大众 CPR 与高强度的身体活动融入到当地流行音乐的节奏中。本研究旨在比较 fit-CPR 与标准课堂方法(CCM)的效果。
2018 年 8 月 30 日至 11 月 29 日,来自印度尼西亚班达亚齐的锡亚卡劳大学的 129 名参与者被随机分配到学习 CPR 的小组中,分别通过 fit-CPR 或 CCM 方案进行学习。所有参与者都接受了预测试、后测试和 6 个月的保留测试。每个测试都有一个 10 项的问卷,对人体模型上的 CPR 表现进行评估,使用经过验证的检查表进行评估。
61 名(47.3%)参与者完成了 fit-CPR,而 68 名(52.7%)参与者完成了 CCM。两组在知识、表现和 CPR 质量方面均有显著改善,从预测试、后测试和 6 个月的保留测试(<0.01)。在高质量的 CPR 方面,fit-CPR 和 CCM 组的得分分别增加了 285.0%和 151%,=0.014 为预测试和即时后测试之间的差异。fit-CPR 和 CCM 组的知识得分分别增加了 79.5%和 111.2%,=0.002 为组间差异。fit-CPR 的完成时间为 52.5-57.5 分钟,而 CCM 则需要 75 分钟。
在向大众传授心肺复苏时,fit-CPR 与标准心肺复苏的效果相当,但花费的时间更少。