Suppr超能文献

糖尿病对心肌梗死后β受体阻滞剂治疗获益的影响。

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Benefit of β-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Division of Cardiology, Orlando Health Heart Institute, Orlando, Florida.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;198:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.04.022. Epub 2023 May 12.

Abstract

Beta blockers are uniformly recommended for all patients after myocardial infarction (MI), including those with diabetes mellitus (DM). This study assesses the impact of β-blocker type and dosing on survival in patients with DM after MI. A cohort of 6,682 patients in the Outcomes of Beta-blocker Therapy After Myocardial INfarction registry were discharged after MI. In this cohort, 2,137 patients had DM (32%). Beta-blocker dose was indexed to the target daily dose used in randomized clinical trials and reported as percentage. Dosage groups were: no β blocker, >0% to 12.5%, >12.5% to 25%, >25% to 50%, and >50% of the target dose. The overall mean discharge β-blocker dose in patients with DM was 42.7 ± 34.1% versus 35.9 ± 27.4% in patients without DM (p <0.0001). Patients with DM were prescribed carvedilol at a higher rate than those without DM (27.8% vs 19.6%). The 3-year mortality estimates were 24.4% and 12.8% for patients with DM versus without DM (p <0.0001), respectively, with an unadjusted hazard ratio = 1.820 (confidence interval 1.587 to 2.086, p <0.0001). Patients with DM in the >12.5% to 25% dose category had the highest survival rates, whereas patients in the >50% dose had the lowest survival rate among patients discharged on β blockers (p <0.0001). In the multivariable analysis among patients with DM after MI, all β-blocker dose categories demonstrated lower mortality than no therapy; however, only the >12.5% to 25% dose had a statistically significant hazard ratio 0.450 (95% confidence interval 0.224 to 0.907, p = 0.025). In patients with DM, there was no statistically significant difference in 3-year mortality among those treated with metoprolol versus carvedilol. In conclusion, our analysis in patients with DM after MI suggested a survival benefit from β-blocker therapy, with no apparent advantage to high- versus low-dose β-blocker therapy; although, physicians tended to prescribe higher doses in patients with DM. There was no survival benefit for carvedilol over metoprolol in patients with DM.

摘要

β受体阻滞剂被一致推荐用于所有心肌梗死后(MI)的患者,包括合并糖尿病(DM)的患者。本研究评估了β受体阻滞剂类型和剂量对 MI 后合并 DM 患者生存的影响。在 Outcomes of Beta-blocker Therapy After Myocardial INfarction 登记研究中,有 6682 名患者出院时患有 MI。在该队列中,有 2137 名患者患有 DM(32%)。β受体阻滞剂的剂量以随机临床试验中使用的目标日剂量为指标,并以百分比表示。剂量组为:无β受体阻滞剂、>0%至 12.5%、>12.5%至 25%、>25%至 50%和>50%目标剂量。在合并 DM 的患者中,出院时β受体阻滞剂的平均剂量为 42.7±34.1%,而在无 DM 的患者中为 35.9±27.4%(p<0.0001)。与无 DM 患者相比,DM 患者更倾向于使用卡维地洛(27.8% vs 19.6%)。DM 患者的 3 年死亡率估计分别为 24.4%和 12.8%(p<0.0001),未经调整的风险比为 1.820(95%置信区间为 1.587 至 2.086,p<0.0001)。在β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者中,>12.5%至 25%剂量组的患者生存率最高,而>50%剂量组的患者生存率最低(p<0.0001)。在 MI 后合并 DM 的患者的多变量分析中,所有β受体阻滞剂剂量组的死亡率均低于无治疗组;然而,只有>12.5%至 25%剂量组的风险比具有统计学意义(0.450,95%置信区间 0.224 至 0.907,p=0.025)。在合并 DM 的患者中,接受美托洛尔和卡维地洛治疗的患者在 3 年死亡率方面无统计学差异。总之,我们对 MI 后合并 DM 的患者进行的分析表明,β受体阻滞剂治疗具有生存获益,高剂量与低剂量β受体阻滞剂治疗之间无明显差异;尽管如此,医生倾向于为 DM 患者开更高剂量的药物。在合并 DM 的患者中,卡维地洛并未比美托洛尔有生存获益。

相似文献

1
Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Benefit of β-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Jul 1;198:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.04.022. Epub 2023 May 12.
2
Comparison of Metoprolol Versus Carvedilol After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 2021 May 15;147:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
3
Type of β-blocker use among patients with versus without diabetes after myocardial infarction.
Am Heart J. 2014 Sep;168(3):273-279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
4
Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 29;66(13):1431-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.047.
6
Effect of carvedilol in comparison with metoprolol on myocardial collagen postinfarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jul;36(1):276-81. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00671-9.
8
One-Year Landmark Analysis of the Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e019017. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019017. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
10
Metoprolol Versus Carvedilol in Patients With Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, and Renal Failure.
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 1;125(7):1069-1076. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.12.048. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
One-Year Landmark Analysis of the Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e019017. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019017. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
3
Association between β-blocker dose and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction: insights from the SWEDEHEART registry.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 May 25;10(4):372-379. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaa002.
4
Optimal Dose and Type of β-blockers in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Dec 15;137:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.09.044. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
5
Prognostic Impact of β-Blocker Dose After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Circ J. 2019 Jan 25;83(2):410-417. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0662. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
6
Effect on Mortality of Higher Versus Lower β-Blocker (Metoprolol Succinate or Carvedilol) Dose in Patients With Heart Failure.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;122(6):994-998. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.05.038. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
7
Effect of beta-blocker dose on mortality after acute coronary syndrome.
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Mar;37(3):239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.06.022. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 29;66(13):1431-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.047.
10
Type of β-blocker use among patients with versus without diabetes after myocardial infarction.
Am Heart J. 2014 Sep;168(3):273-279.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Jun 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验