Dunn Cornelle, Cloete Philip, Saunders Colleen, Evans Katya
Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Groote Schuur Hospital, Observatory, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.
Int J Emerg Med. 2023 May 15;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12245-023-00508-x.
Procedural sedation and analgesia are considered a core competency in emergency medicine as patients present to the emergency centre on an unscheduled basis, often with complex complaints that necessitate emergent management. Previous evidence has consistently shown that procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency centre in the paediatric population, even the very young, are safe if appropriate monitoring is performed and appropriate medications are used. The aim of the study was to describe the indications for procedural sedation and analgesia, the fasting status of paediatric patients undergoing procedural sedation and analgesia and the complications observed during procedural sedation and analgesia in the paediatric population at a single emergency centre in Cape Town, South Africa.
A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted at Mitchells Plain Hospital, a district-level hospital situated in Mitchells Plain, Cape Town. All paediatric patients younger than 13 years of age who presented to the emergency centre and received procedural sedation and analgesia during the study period (December 2020-April 2021) were included in the study. Data was extracted from a standardised form, and simple descriptive statistics were used.
A total of 113 patients (69% male) were included: 13 infants (< 1 year of age), 47 young children (1-5 years of age) and 53 older children (5-13 years of age). There was only 1 (0.9%) complication documented, which was vomiting and did not require admission. The majority of patients received ketamine (96.5%). The standardised procedural sedation and analgesia form was completed in 49.1% of cases. Indications included burns debridement (11.5%), suturing (17.7%), fracture reduction (23.9%), lumbar punctures (31.9%) and others (15.0%). The indications for procedural sedation and analgesia varied between the different age groups. The majority of patients in this study did not have their fasting status documented (68.1%), and 18.6% were not appropriately fasted as per American Society of Anaesthesiology guidelines. Despite this, there was an extremely low rate of documented complications of 0.9%.
The study findings are in accordance with previous international literature reporting low complication rates. Although fasting status was unknown in the majority of patients, there was an extremely low rate of documented complications and no interventions required. Safe, timely procedural sedation and analgesia with minimal pain and unnecessary suffering can become the norm in emergency medicine practice in South Africa.
由于患者不定期前往急诊中心,常常伴有需要紧急处理的复杂症状,因此程序性镇静和镇痛被视为急诊医学的一项核心能力。先前的证据一致表明,在儿科人群的急诊中心,即使是非常年幼的儿童,只要进行适当监测并使用适当药物,程序性镇静和镇痛就是安全的。本研究的目的是描述南非开普敦一家急诊中心儿科人群程序性镇静和镇痛的适应证、接受程序性镇静和镇痛的儿科患者的禁食状态以及程序性镇静和镇痛期间观察到的并发症。
在位于开普敦米切尔平原的区级医院米切尔平原医院进行了一项回顾性描述性研究。纳入所有在研究期间(2020年12月至2021年4月)前往急诊中心并接受程序性镇静和镇痛的13岁以下儿科患者。数据从标准化表格中提取,并使用简单的描述性统计方法。
共纳入113例患者(69%为男性):13例婴儿(<1岁)、47例幼儿(1 - 5岁)和53例大龄儿童(5 - 13岁)。仅记录到1例(0.9%)并发症,为呕吐,无需住院治疗。大多数患者接受了氯胺酮(96.5%)。49.1%的病例完成了标准化的程序性镇静和镇痛表格。适应证包括烧伤清创(11.5%)、缝合(17.7%)、骨折复位(23.9%)、腰椎穿刺(31.9%)和其他(15.0%)。程序性镇静和镇痛的适应证在不同年龄组之间有所不同。本研究中的大多数患者未记录禁食状态(68.1%),且18.6%的患者未按照美国麻醉医师协会指南适当禁食。尽管如此,记录的并发症发生率极低,为0.9%。
研究结果与先前国际文献报道的低并发症发生率一致。尽管大多数患者的禁食状态未知,但记录的并发症发生率极低,且无需干预。在南非的急诊医学实践中,以最小的疼痛和不必要的痛苦进行安全、及时的程序性镇静和镇痛可以成为常态。